» Articles » PMID: 23957458

Timing of Operation for Poor-grade Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview
Journal BMC Neurol
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Neurology
Date 2013 Aug 21
PMID 23957458
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Subarachnoid hemorrhage is a common and dangerous disease with an unfavorable prognosis. Patients with poor-grade subarachnoid hemorrhage (Hunt & Hess Grades 4-5) are unconscious on admission. Because of the high mortality and disability rate associated with poor-grade subarachnoid hemorrhage, it is often treated conservatively. Timing of surgery for poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage is still controversial, therefore this study aims to identify the optimal time to operate on patients admitted in poor clinical condition.

Methods/design: Ninety-nine patients meeting the inclusion criteria were randomly assigned into three treatment groups. The early surgery group received operation within 3 days after onset of subarachnoid hemorrhage (day of SAH = day 1); the intermediate surgery group received operation from days 4 to 7, and surgery was performed on the late surgery group after day 7. Follow-up was performed 1, 3, and 6 months after aneurysm clipping. Primary indicators of outcome included the Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale and the Modified Rankin Scale, while secondary indicators of outcome were assessed using the Barthel Index and mortality.

Discussion: This is the first prospective, single-center, observer-blinded, randomized controlled trial to elucidate optimal timing for surgery in poor-grade subarachnoid hemorrhage patients. The results of this study will be used to direct decisions of surgical intervention in poor-grade subarachnoid hemorrhage, thus improving clinical outcomes for patients.

Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR-TRC-12002917.

Citing Articles

The Factors Associated with Outcomes in Surgically Managed Ruptured Cerebral Aneurysm.

Chee L, Siregar J, Ghani A, Idris Z, Rahman Mohd N Malays J Med Sci. 2018; 25(1):32-41.

PMID: 29599633 PMC: 5862049. DOI: 10.21315/mjms2018.25.1.5.


Reporting of planned statistical methods in published surgical randomised trial protocols: a protocol for a methodological systematic review.

Madden K, Arseneau E, Evaniew N, Smith C, Thabane L BMJ Open. 2016; 6(6):e011188.

PMID: 27259528 PMC: 4893854. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011188.


The critical care management of poor-grade subarachnoid haemorrhage.

de Oliveira Manoel A, Goffi A, Marotta T, Schweizer T, Abrahamson S, Loch Macdonald R Crit Care. 2016; 20:21.

PMID: 26801901 PMC: 4724088. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-016-1193-9.


A Multicenter prospective study of poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (AMPAS): observational registry study.

Zhao B, Tan X, Yang H, Zheng K, Li Z, Xiong Y BMC Neurol. 2014; 14:86.

PMID: 24742248 PMC: 3997185. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2377-14-86.

References
1.
Hutchinson P, Power D, Tripathi P, Kirkpatrick P . Outcome from poor grade aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage--which poor grade subarachnoid haemorrhage patients benefit from aneurysm clipping?. Br J Neurosurg. 2000; 14(2):105-9. DOI: 10.1080/02688690050004516. View

2.
Maurice-Williams R, Lafuente J . Intracranial aneurysm surgery and its future. J R Soc Med. 2003; 96(11):540-3. PMC: 539625. DOI: 10.1177/014107680309601106. View

3.
Inagawa T, Tokuda Y, Ohbayashi N, Takaya M, Moritake K . Study of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage in Izumo City, Japan. Stroke. 1995; 26(5):761-6. DOI: 10.1161/01.str.26.5.761. View

4.
Shirao S, Yoneda H, Kunitsugu I, Ishihara H, Koizumi H, Suehiro E . Preoperative prediction of outcome in 283 poor-grade patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage: a project of the Chugoku-Shikoku Division of the Japan Neurosurgical Society. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2010; 30(2):105-13. DOI: 10.1159/000314713. View

5.
Hollerhage H . Nimodipine treatment in poor-grade aneurysm patients. J Neurosurg. 1988; 69(5):803-5. View