» Articles » PMID: 23951353

Evaluation of EGFR and RTK Signaling in the Electrotaxis of Lung Adenocarcinoma Cells Under Direct-current Electric Field Stimulation

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2013 Aug 17
PMID 23951353
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Physiological electric field (EF) plays a pivotal role in tissue development and regeneration. In vitro, cells under direct-current electric field (dcEF) stimulation may demonstrate directional migration (electrotaxis) and long axis reorientation (electro-alignment). Although the biophysical models and biochemical signaling pathways behind cell electrotaxis have been investigated in numerous normal cells and cancer cells, the molecular signaling mechanisms in CL1 lung adenocarcinoma cells have not been identified. Two subclones of CL1 cells, the low invasive CL1-0 cells and the highly invasive CL 1-5 cells, were investigated in the present study. CL1-0 cells are non-electrotactic while the CL 1-5 cells are anodally electrotactic and have high expression level of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), in this study, we investigated the generally accepted hypothesis of receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) activation in the two cell lines under dcEF stimulation. Erbitux, a therapeutic drug containing an anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody, cetuximab, was used to investigate the EGFR signaling in the electrotaxis of CL 1-5 cells. To investigate RTK phosphorylation and intracellular signaling in the CL1 cells, large amount of cellular proteins were collected in an airtight dcEF stimulation device, which has advantages of large culture area, uniform EF distribution, easy operation, easy cell collection, no contamination, and no medium evaporation. Commercial antibody arrays and Western blotting were used to study the phosphorylation profiles of major proteins in CL1 cells under dcEF stimulation. We found that electrotaxis of CL 1-5 cells is serum independent and EGFR independent. Moreover, the phosphorylation of Akt and S6 ribosomal protein (rpS6) in dcEF-stimulated CL1 cells are different from that in EGF-stimulated cells. This result suggests that CL1 cells' response to dcEF stimulation is not through EGFR-triggered pathways. The new large-scale dcEF stimulation device developed in the present work will aid the sample preparation for protein-based experiments.

Citing Articles

Impact of dcEF on microRNA profiles in glioblastoma and exosomes using a novel microfluidic bioreactor.

Tsai H, Shen A Biomicrofluidics. 2025; 18(6):064106.

PMID: 39742343 PMC: 11686958. DOI: 10.1063/5.0228901.


Glioblastoma U-87 cell electrotaxis is hindered by doxycycline with a concomitant reduction in the matrix metallopeptidase-9 expression.

Chang H, Cheng J Biochem Biophys Rep. 2024; 38:101690.

PMID: 38571555 PMC: 10987802. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrep.2024.101690.


Galvanotactic Migration of Glioblastoma and Brain Metastases Cells.

Lange F, Venus J, Shams Esfand Abady D, Porath K, Einsle A, Sellmann T Life (Basel). 2022; 12(4).

PMID: 35455071 PMC: 9027426. DOI: 10.3390/life12040580.


Electrical stimulation of human neural stem cells via conductive polymer nerve guides enhances peripheral nerve recovery.

Song S, McConnell K, Amores D, Levinson A, Vogel H, Quarta M Biomaterials. 2021; 275:120982.

PMID: 34214785 PMC: 8325644. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.120982.


Voltage-gated ion channels mediate the electrotaxis of glioblastoma cells in a hybrid PMMA/PDMS microdevice.

Tsai H, IJspeert C, Shen A APL Bioeng. 2020; 4(3):036102.

PMID: 32637857 PMC: 7332302. DOI: 10.1063/5.0004893.


References
1.
McBain V, Forrester J, McCaig C . HGF, MAPK, and a small physiological electric field interact during corneal epithelial cell migration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003; 44(2):540-7. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.02-0570. View

2.
Jaffe L . Electrophoresis along cell membranes. Nature. 1977; 265(5595):600-2. DOI: 10.1038/265600a0. View

3.
Pu J, McCaig C, Cao L, Zhao Z, Segall J, Zhao M . EGF receptor signalling is essential for electric-field-directed migration of breast cancer cells. J Cell Sci. 2007; 120(Pt 19):3395-403. DOI: 10.1242/jcs.002774. View

4.
Lu Z, Jiang G, Blume-Jensen P, Hunter T . Epidermal growth factor-induced tumor cell invasion and metastasis initiated by dephosphorylation and downregulation of focal adhesion kinase. Mol Cell Biol. 2001; 21(12):4016-31. PMC: 87064. DOI: 10.1128/MCB.21.12.4016-4031.2001. View

5.
Ono M, Kuwano M . Molecular mechanisms of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) activation and response to gefitinib and other EGFR-targeting drugs. Clin Cancer Res. 2006; 12(24):7242-51. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-0646. View