» Articles » PMID: 23949280

The Emerging Role of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in the Evaluation of Kawasaki Disease

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty Radiology
Date 2013 Aug 17
PMID 23949280
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Kawasaki disease (KD) is a vasculitis affecting the coronary and systemic arteries. Myocardial inflammation is also a common finding in KD post-mortem evaluation during the acute phase of the disease. Coronary artery aneurysms (CAAs) develop in 15-25% of untreated children. Although 50-70% of CAAs resolve spontaneously 1-2 years after the onset of KD, the remaining unresolved CAAs can develop stenotic lesions at either their proximal or distal end and can develop thrombus formation leading to ischemia and/or infarction. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has the ability to perform non-invasive and radiation-free evaluation of the coronary artery lumen. Recently tissue characterization of the coronary vessel wall was provided by CMR. It can also image myocardial inflammation, ischemia and fibrosis. Therefore CMR offers important clinical information during the acute and chronic phase of KD. In the acute phase, it can identify myocardial inflammation, microvascular disease, myocardial infarction, deterioration of left ventricular function, changes of the coronary artery lumen and changes of the coronary artery vessel wall. During the chronic phase, CMR imaging might be of value for risk stratification and to guide treatment.

Citing Articles

A Young Woman with Fulminant Myocarditis with Cardiogenic Shock - Management with Assist Devices: A Case Report.

Hu F, Luo B, Yuan X, Zhang L, Chen L Int Med Case Rep J. 2024; 17:93-100.

PMID: 38344470 PMC: 10859050. DOI: 10.2147/IMCRJ.S440590.


Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging Patterns in Rare Cardiovascular Diseases.

Markousis-Mavrogenis G, Giannakopoulou A, Belegrinos A, Pons M, Bonou M, Vartela V J Clin Med. 2022; 11(21).

PMID: 36362632 PMC: 9657782. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11216403.


SCMR expert consensus statement for cardiovascular magnetic resonance of acquired and non-structural pediatric heart disease.

Dorfman A, Geva T, Samyn M, Greil G, Krishnamurthy R, Messroghli D J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2022; 24(1):44.

PMID: 35864534 PMC: 9302232. DOI: 10.1186/s12968-022-00873-1.


Automated Quantitative Stress Perfusion Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Pediatric Patients.

Scannell C, Hasaneen H, Greil G, Hussain T, Razavi R, Lee J Front Pediatr. 2021; 9:699497.

PMID: 34540764 PMC: 8446614. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2021.699497.


The importance of heart and brain imaging in children and adolescents with Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MIS-C).

Mavrogeni S, Kolovou G, Tsirimpis V, Kafetzis D, Tsolas G, Fotis L Rheumatol Int. 2021; 41(6):1037-1044.

PMID: 33864498 PMC: 8052538. DOI: 10.1007/s00296-021-04845-z.


References
1.
Naoe S, Takahashi K, Masuda H, Tanaka N . Kawasaki disease. With particular emphasis on arterial lesions. Acta Pathol Jpn. 1991; 41(11):785-97. DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1827.1991.tb01620.x. View

2.
Kim R, Fieno D, Parrish T, Harris K, Chen E, Simonetti O . Relationship of MRI delayed contrast enhancement to irreversible injury, infarct age, and contractile function. Circulation. 1999; 100(19):1992-2002. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.100.19.1992. View

3.
Iles L, Pfluger H, Phrommintikul A, Cherayath J, Aksit P, Gupta S . Evaluation of diffuse myocardial fibrosis in heart failure with cardiac magnetic resonance contrast-enhanced T1 mapping. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008; 52(19):1574-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.06.049. View

4.
Wu Y, Ye Q, Sato K, Foley L, Hitchens T, Ho C . Noninvasive evaluation of cardiac allograft rejection by cellular and functional cardiac magnetic resonance. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009; 2(6):731-41. PMC: 2752220. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2009.01.013. View

5.
Gutberlet M, Schwinge K, Freyhardt P, Spors B, Grothoff M, Denecke T . Influence of high magnetic field strengths and parallel acquisition strategies on image quality in cardiac 2D CINE magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of 1.5 T vs. 3.0 T. Eur Radiol. 2005; 15(8):1586-97. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-005-2768-z. View