» Articles » PMID: 23948010

Disparities in Abortion Rates: a Public Health Approach

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2013 Aug 17
PMID 23948010
Citations 47
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Women of lower socioeconomic status and women of color in the United States have higher rates of abortion than women of higher socioeconomic status and White women. Opponents of abortion use these statistics to argue that abortion providers are exploiting women of color and low socioeconomic status, and thus, regulations are needed to protect women. This argument ignores the underlying causes of the disparities. As efforts to restrict abortion will have no effect on these underlying factors, and instead will only result in more women experiencing later abortions or having an unintended childbirth, they are likely to result in worsening health disparities. We provide a review of the causes of abortion disparities and argue for a multifaceted public health approach to address them.

Citing Articles

US Abortion Bans and Fertility.

Bell S, Franks A, Arbour D, Anjur-Dietrich S, Stuart E, Ben-Michael E JAMA. 2025; .

PMID: 39946144 PMC: 11826436. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2024.28527.


US Abortion Bans and Infant Mortality.

Gemmill A, Franks A, Anjur-Dietrich S, Ozinsky A, Arbour D, Stuart E JAMA. 2025; .

PMID: 39946113 PMC: 11826430. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2024.28517.


Weight and Procedural Abortion Complications: A Systematic Review.

McMahon H, Moss R, Pearce N, Sehgal S, He Z, Kriete M Obstet Gynecol. 2025; 145(3):307-315.

PMID: 39746207 PMC: 11842204. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005821.


Abortion Surveillance - United States, 2022.

Ramer S, Nguyen A, Hollier L, Rodenhizer J, Warner L, Whiteman M MMWR Surveill Summ. 2024; 73(7):1-28.

PMID: 39602470 PMC: 11616987. DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7307a1.


Making sense of the economics of abortion in the United States.

Weitz T Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2024; 56(3):199-210.

PMID: 39537337 PMC: 11606007. DOI: 10.1111/psrh.12288.


References
1.
Finer L, Zolna M . Unintended pregnancy in the United States: incidence and disparities, 2006. Contraception. 2011; 84(5):478-85. PMC: 3338192. DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.07.013. View

2.
Cubbin C, Brindis C, Jain S, Santelli J, Braveman P . Neighborhood poverty, aspirations and expectations, and initiation of sex. J Adolesc Health. 2010; 47(4):399-406. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.02.010. View

3.
Santelli J . Medical accuracy in sexuality education: ideology and the scientific process. Am J Public Health. 2008; 98(10):1786-92. PMC: 2636467. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.119602. View

4.
Henshaw S, Wallisch L . The Medicaid cutoff and abortion services for the poor. Fam Plann Perspect. 1984; 16(4):171-2, 177-80. View

5.
Finer L, Frohwirth L, Dauphinee L, Singh S, Moore A . Timing of steps and reasons for delays in obtaining abortions in the United States. Contraception. 2006; 74(4):334-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2006.04.010. View