» Articles » PMID: 23943555

Crossing the Arms Confuses the Clocks: Sensory Feedback and the Bimanual Advantage

Overview
Specialty Psychology
Date 2013 Aug 15
PMID 23943555
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The bimanual advantage refers to the finding that tapping with two fingers on opposite hands exhibits reduced timing variability, as compared with tapping with only one finger. Two leading theories propose that the bimanual advantage results from the addition of either sensory (i.e., enhanced feedback) or cognitive (i.e., multiple timekeeper) processes involved in timing. Given that crossing the arms impairs perception of tactile stimuli and modulates cortical activation following tactile stimulation, we investigated the role of crossing the arms in the bimanual advantage. Participants tapped unimanually or bimanually with their arms crossed or uncrossed on a tabletop or in the air. With arms crossed, we expected increased interval timing variance. Similarly, for air tapping, we expected reduced bimanual advantage, due to reduced sensory feedback. A significant bimanual advantage was observed for the uncrossed, but not the crossed posture in tabletop tapping. Furthermore, removing tactile feedback from taps eliminated the bimanual advantage for both postures. Together, these findings suggest that crossing the arms likely impairs integration of internal (i.e., effector-specific) and external (i.e., environment-specific) information and that this multisensory integration is crucial to reducing timing variability during repetitive coordinated bimanual tasks.

Citing Articles

Co-speech gestures influence the magnitude and stability of articulatory movements: evidence for coupling-based enhancement.

Garvin K, Spradling E, Franich K Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):157.

PMID: 39748052 PMC: 11695587. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-84097-6.


Head movements induced by voluntary neck flexion stabilize sensorimotor synchronization of the finger to syncopated auditory rhythms.

Yamazaki R, Ushiyama J Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1335050.

PMID: 38903467 PMC: 11188995. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1335050.


Fractal properties in sensorimotor variability unveil internal adaptations of the organism before symptomatic functional decline.

Torre K, Vergotte G, Viel E, Perrey S, Dupeyron A Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):15736.

PMID: 31673034 PMC: 6823488. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-52091-y.


Towards explaining spatial touch perception: Weighted integration of multiple location codes.

Badde S, Heed T Cogn Neuropsychol. 2016; 33(1-2):26-47.

PMID: 27327353 PMC: 4975087. DOI: 10.1080/02643294.2016.1168791.


Physical and neural entrainment to rhythm: human sensorimotor coordination across tasks and effector systems.

Ross J, Balasubramaniam R Front Hum Neurosci. 2014; 8:576.

PMID: 25136306 PMC: 4118030. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00576.

References
1.
Helmuth L, Ivry R . When two hands are better than one: reduced timing variability during bimanual movements. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1996; 22(2):278-93. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.22.2.278. View

2.
Balasubramaniam R, Wing A, Daffertshofer A . Keeping with the beat: movement trajectories contribute to movement timing. Exp Brain Res. 2004; 159(1):129-34. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-004-2066-z. View

3.
Bolognini N, Maravita A . Proprioceptive alignment of visual and somatosensory maps in the posterior parietal cortex. Curr Biol. 2007; 17(21):1890-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.09.057. View

4.
Aschersleben G, Prinz W . Synchronizing actions with events: the role of sensory information. Percept Psychophys. 1995; 57(3):305-17. DOI: 10.3758/bf03213056. View

5.
Pressing . Error Correction Processes in Temporal Pattern Production. J Math Psychol. 1998; 42(1):63-101. DOI: 10.1006/jmps.1997.1194. View