» Articles » PMID: 23942285

Treatment Outcomes of Single- Versus Double-row Repair for Larger Than Medium-sized Rotator Cuff Tears: the Effect of Preoperative Remnant Tendon Length

Overview
Journal Am J Sports Med
Publisher Sage Publications
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2013 Aug 15
PMID 23942285
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: In rotator cuff repair, no practical guidelines exist for deciding which technique is the most beneficial to outcomes.

Purpose: To determine which of 2 repair techniques, the single-row (SR) and double-row suture bridge (DR-SB) methods, leads to better therapeutic outcomes in terms of remnant tendon length in patients with larger than medium-sized cuff tears.

Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods: Remnant tendon length, muscle atrophy, and fatty degeneration were measured on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in 78 patients with larger than medium-sized rotator cuff tears who were available for follow-up MRI. There were 30 patients with remnant tendons <10 mm in length (group 1) and 48 with remnant tendons ≥10 mm in length (group 2). In group 1, the SR technique was performed on 17 patients and the DR-SB technique on 13 patients. In group 2, the SR technique was performed on 16 patients and the DR-SB technique on 32 patients. The mean follow-up period for all patients was 26.6 months (range, 24-42 months). Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Constant, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores.

Results: In group 1, there was 1 retear (6%) with the SR repair and 6 (46%) with the DR-SB repair. In group 2, there were 3 retears (19%) with the SR repair and 2 (6%) with the DR-SB repair. The retear rate was significantly higher in patients with the DR-SB repair in group 1 (P = .025), while there was no significant difference between the 2 techniques in group 2 (P = .316). The UCLA and Constant scores were significantly higher in patients with the SR repair in group 1 (P = .02 and P = .029, respectively), and the UCLA and ASES scores were significantly higher in patients with the DR-SB repair in group 2 (P < .001 and P = .001, respectively).

Conclusion: Remnant tendon length should be considered to improve repair integrity. The SR technique may provide superior rotator cuff integrity when remnant tendons are <10 mm in length.

Citing Articles

[Early effectiveness of arthroscopic repair of supraspinatus tendon tears with douple-pulley suture-bridge].

Huang P, Wang B, Tan G, Wang X, Zeng Z, Qiu M Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2023; 37(11):1380-1385.

PMID: 37987048 PMC: 10662401. DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.202307025.


Does Complete Footprint Coverage Affect Outcomes After Conventional Arthroscopic Repair of Large-Sized Rotator Cuff Tears?.

Jeong E, Lee D, Lee J, Lee J, Lho T, Chung S Orthop J Sports Med. 2022; 10(9):23259671221120598.

PMID: 36157086 PMC: 9502255. DOI: 10.1177/23259671221120598.


Statistical Fragility of Single-Row Versus Double-Row Anchoring for Rotator Cuff Repair: A Systematic Review of Comparative Studies.

Fackler N, Ehlers C, Callan K, Amirhekmat A, Smith E, Parisien R Orthop J Sports Med. 2022; 10(5):23259671221093391.

PMID: 35571970 PMC: 9096204. DOI: 10.1177/23259671221093391.


The "Greenhouse" Technique Using Knotless Single-Row Suture Bridge Combined With Bone Marrow Stimulation for the Arthroscopic Treatment of Rotator Cuff Tears.

Lu Y, Yang G, Li S, Li X, Jiang C Arthrosc Tech. 2022; 11(2):e189-e196.

PMID: 35155112 PMC: 8821313. DOI: 10.1016/j.eats.2021.10.010.


A comparison of simple and complex single-row versus transosseous-equivalent double-row repair techniques for full-thickness rotator cuff tears: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ponugoti N, Raghu A, Colaco H, Magill H JSES Int. 2022; 6(1):70-78.

PMID: 35141679 PMC: 8811406. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2021.09.007.