» Articles » PMID: 23941533

Feasibility Study Demonstrating That Enzymatic Template Generation and Amplification Can Be Employed As a Novel Method for Molecular Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

Overview
Journal BMC Microbiol
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2013 Aug 15
PMID 23941533
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (AST) is a methodology in which the sensitivity of a microorganism is determined via its inability to proliferate in the presence of an antimicrobial agent. Results are reported as minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs). The present study demonstrates that measurement of DNA polymerase activity via Enzymatic Template Generation and Amplification (ETGA) can be used as a novel means of determining the MIC of a microbe to an antibiotic agent much sooner than the current standardized method.

Methods: Time course analysis of ETGA is presented from bacterial cultures containing antibiotic agents and compared to the end-point results of standard macrobroth method AST.

Results: MIC determinations from ETGA results at 4, 6, and 22 hours are compared to the MICs from the standard method and the results are shown to be in agreement. Additionally, reliable AST analysis using ETGA can be performed on bacteria harvested directly from spiked blood cultures.

Conclusions: AST analysis with ETGA is shown to be equivalent to AST analysis using gene-specific qPCR assays against the measured microbe. Future development of this novel method for performing AST in a clinical setting is discussed.

Citing Articles

Developmental origins of metabolic diseases.

Hoffman D, Powell T, Barrett E, Hardy D Physiol Rev. 2020; 101(3):739-795.

PMID: 33270534 PMC: 8526339. DOI: 10.1152/physrev.00002.2020.


Rapid Phenotypic Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing of Uropathogens Using Optical Signal Analysis on the Nanowell Slide.

Veses-Garcia M, Antypas H, Loffler S, Brauner A, Andersson-Svahn H, Richter-Dahlfors A Front Microbiol. 2018; 9:1530.

PMID: 30042754 PMC: 6048231. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01530.

References
1.
Chambers H, Hackbarth C . Effect of NaCl and nafcillin on penicillin-binding protein 2a and heterogeneous expression of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1987; 31(12):1982-8. PMC: 175839. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.31.12.1982. View

2.
Andrews J . BSAC standardized disc susceptibility testing method (version 5). J Antimicrob Chemother. 2006; 58(3):511-29. DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkl277. View

3.
Doern G, Vautour R, Gaudet M, Levy B . Clinical impact of rapid in vitro susceptibility testing and bacterial identification. J Clin Microbiol. 1994; 32(7):1757-62. PMC: 263786. DOI: 10.1128/jcm.32.7.1757-1762.1994. View

4.
Holland T, Woods C, Joyce M . Antibacterial susceptibility testing in the clinical laboratory. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2009; 23(4):757-90, vii. DOI: 10.1016/j.idc.2009.06.001. View

5.
Hansen W, Beuving J, Verbon A, Wolffs P . One-day workflow scheme for bacterial pathogen detection and antimicrobial resistance testing from blood cultures. J Vis Exp. 2012; (65). PMC: 3471279. DOI: 10.3791/3254. View