» Articles » PMID: 23940585

Mouse Strain Determines Cardiac Growth Potential

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2013 Aug 14
PMID 23940585
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Rationale: The extent of heart disease varies from person to person, suggesting that genetic background is important in pathology. Genetic background is also important when selecting appropriate mouse models to study heart disease. This study examines heart growth as a function of strain, specifically C57BL/6 and DBA/2 mouse strains.

Objective: In this study, we test the hypothesis that two strains of mice, C57BL/6 and DBA/2, will produce varying degrees of heart growth in both physiological and pathological settings.

Methods And Results: Differences in heart dimensions are detectable by echocardiography at 8 weeks of age. Percentages of cardiac progenitor cells (c-kit+ cells) and mononucleated cells were found to be in a higher percentage in DBA/2 mice, and more tri- and quad-nucleated cells were in C57BL/6 mice. Cardiomyocyte turnover shows no significant changes in mitotic activity, however, there is more apoptotic activity in DBA/2 mice. Cardiomyocyte cell size increased with age, but increased more in DBA/2 mice, although percentages of nucleated cells remained the same in both strains. Two-week isoproterenol stimulation showed an increase in heart growth in DBA/2 mice, both at cardiomyocyte and whole heart level. In isoproterenol-treated DBA/2 mice, there was also a greater expression level of the hypertrophy marker, ANF, compared to C57BL/6 mice.

Conclusion: We conclude that the DBA/2 mouse strain has a more immature cardiac phenotype, which correlates to a cardiac protective response to hypertrophy in both physiological and pathological stimulations.

Citing Articles

Comparative phenotyping of C57BL/6J substrains reveals distinctive patterns of cardiac aging.

Walter S, Baumgarten P, Hegemann N, Haseli S, Deubel S, Jelleschitz J Geroscience. 2025; .

PMID: 39885113 DOI: 10.1007/s11357-025-01543-7.


Metabolic Syndrome Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Male Mouse With Adeno-Associated Viral Renin as a Novel Model for Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.

Shi Y, Perez-Bonilla P, Chen X, Tam K, Marshall M, Morin J J Am Heart Assoc. 2024; 13(23):e035894.

PMID: 39575718 PMC: 11681587. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.124.035894.


Revisiting Cardiac Biology in the Era of Single Cell and Spatial Omics.

Palmer J, Rosenthal N, Teichmann S, Litvinukova M Circ Res. 2024; 134(12):1681-1702.

PMID: 38843288 PMC: 11149945. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.124.323672.


Age-Related Shift in Cardiac and Metabolic Phenotyping Linked to Inflammatory Cytokines and Antioxidant Status in Mice.

Kang R, Laborde C, Savchenko L, Swiader A, Pizzinat N, Marsal D Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(21).

PMID: 37958823 PMC: 10650425. DOI: 10.3390/ijms242115841.


Genome-wide transcript and protein analysis highlights the role of protein homeostasis in the aging mouse heart.

Gerdes Gyuricza I, Chick J, Keele G, Deighan A, Munger S, Korstanje R Genome Res. 2022; 32(5):838-852.

PMID: 35277432 PMC: 9104701. DOI: 10.1101/gr.275672.121.


References
1.
Anversa P, Leri A, Beltrami C, Guerra S, Kajstura J . Myocyte death and growth in the failing heart. Lab Invest. 1998; 78(7):767-86. View

2.
Bearzi C, Rota M, Hosoda T, Tillmanns J, Nascimbene A, De Angelis A . Human cardiac stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007; 104(35):14068-73. PMC: 1955818. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0706760104. View

3.
Kajstura J, Urbanek K, Perl S, Hosoda T, Zheng H, Ogorek B . Cardiomyogenesis in the adult human heart. Circ Res. 2010; 107(2):305-15. PMC: 2987602. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.223024. View

4.
Tallini Y, Greene K, Craven M, Spealman A, Breitbach M, Smith J . c-kit expression identifies cardiovascular precursors in the neonatal heart. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009; 106(6):1808-13. PMC: 2644119. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0808920106. View

5.
Anversa P, Leri A, Rota M, Hosoda T, Bearzi C, Urbanek K . Concise review: stem cells, myocardial regeneration, and methodological artifacts. Stem Cells. 2006; 25(3):589-601. DOI: 10.1634/stemcells.2006-0623. View