» Articles » PMID: 23927387

Levonorgestrel Releasing Intrauterine System (Mirena) Versus Endometrial Ablation (Novasure) in Women with Heavy Menstrual Bleeding: a Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial

Abstract

Background: Heavy menstrual bleeding is an important health problem. Two frequently used therapies are the levonorgestrel intra-uterine system (LNG-IUS) and endometrial ablation. The LNG-IUS can be applied easily by the general practitioner, which saves costs, but has considerable failure rates. As an alternative, endometrial ablation is also very effective, but this treatment has to be performed by a gynaecologist. Due to lack of direct comparison of LNG-IUS with endometrial ablation, there is no evidence based preferred advice for the use of one of these treatment possibilities.

Method/design: A multicenter randomised controlled trial, organised in a network infrastructure in the Netherlands in which general practitioners and gynaecologists collaborate.

Discusson: This study, considering both effectiveness and cost effectiveness of LNG-IUS versus endometrial ablation may well improve care for women with heavy menstrual bleeding.

Trial Registration: Dutch trial register, number NTR2984.

Citing Articles

First and second-generation endometrial ablation devices: A network meta-analysis.

Marchand G, Masoud A, Grover S, King A, Brazil G, Ulibarri H BMJ Open. 2024; 14(5):e065966.

PMID: 38806429 PMC: 11138282. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065966.


Interventions for heavy menstrual bleeding; overview of Cochrane reviews and network meta-analysis.

Bofill Rodriguez M, Dias S, Jordan V, Lethaby A, Lensen S, Wise M Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022; 5:CD013180.

PMID: 35638592 PMC: 9153244. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013180.pub2.


The levonorgestrel intrauterine system versus endometrial ablation for heavy menstrual bleeding: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

van den Brink M, Beelen P, Herman M, Geomini P, Dekker J, Vermeulen K BJOG. 2021; 128(12):2003-2011.

PMID: 34245652 PMC: 8518490. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16836.


Predictive factors for failure of the levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system in women with heavy menstrual bleeding.

Beelen P, van den Brink M, Herman M, Geomini P, Duijnhoven R, Bongers M BMC Womens Health. 2021; 21(1):57.

PMID: 33563257 PMC: 7871623. DOI: 10.1186/s12905-021-01210-x.


Factors affecting patient recruitment to trials: qualitative research in general practice.

van den Brink M, Hummel M, Lemstra M, Berger M, Dekker J, Blanker M BJGP Open. 2020; 4(3).

PMID: 32723785 PMC: 7465591. DOI: 10.3399/bjgpopen20X101056.


References
1.
Shapley M, Jordan K, Croft P . An epidemiological survey of symptoms of menstrual loss in the community. Br J Gen Pract. 2004; 54(502):359-63. PMC: 1266170. View

2.
Abbott J, Garry R . The surgical management of menorrhagia. Hum Reprod Update. 2002; 8(1):68-78. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/8.1.68. View

3.
Marjoribanks J, Lethaby A, Farquhar C . Surgery versus medical therapy for heavy menstrual bleeding. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006; (2):CD003855. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003855.pub2. View

4.
Crosignani P, Vercellini P, Mosconi P, Oldani S, Cortesi I, De Giorgi O . Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device versus hysteroscopic endometrial resection in the treatment of dysfunctional uterine bleeding. Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 90(2):257-63. DOI: 10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00226-3. View

5.
Shaw R, Symonds I, Tamizian O, Chaplain J, Mukhopadhyay S . Randomised comparative trial of thermal balloon ablation and levonorgestrel intrauterine system in patients with idiopathic menorrhagia. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007; 47(4):335-40. DOI: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2007.00747.x. View