» Articles » PMID: 23923692

A Review of EEG-based Brain-computer Interfaces As Access Pathways for Individuals with Severe Disabilities

Overview
Journal Assist Technol
Date 2013 Aug 9
PMID 23923692
Citations 38
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Electroencephalography (EEG) is a non-invasive method for measuring brain activity and is a strong candidate for brain-computer interface (BCI) development. While BCIs can be used as a means of communication for individuals with severe disabilities, the majority of existing studies have reported BCI evaluations by able-bodied individuals. Considering the many differences in body functions and usage scenarios between individuals with disabilities and able-bodied individuals, involvement of the target population in BCI evaluation is necessary. In this review, 39 studies reporting EEG-oriented BCI assessment by individuals with disabilities were identified in the past decade. With respect to participant populations, a need for assessing BCI performance for the pediatric population with severe disabilities was identified as an important future direction. Acquiring a reliable communication pathway during early stages of development is crucial in avoiding learned helplessness in pediatric-onset disabilities. With respect to evaluation, augmenting traditional measures of system performance with those relating to contextual factors was recommended for realizing user-centered designs appropriate for integration in real-life. Considering indicators of user state and developing more effective training paradigms are recommended for future studies of BCI involving individuals with disabilities.

Citing Articles

Classification of Imagined Speech Signals Using Functional Connectivity Graphs and Machine Learning Models.

Mohan A, Anand R Brain Topogr. 2025; 38(2):25.

PMID: 39873797 DOI: 10.1007/s10548-025-01100-7.


CTNet: a convolutional transformer network for EEG-based motor imagery classification.

Zhao W, Jiang X, Zhang B, Xiao S, Weng S Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):20237.

PMID: 39215126 PMC: 11364810. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-71118-7.


Comparison of recognition methods for an asynchronous (un-cued) BCI system: an investigation with 40-class SSVEP dataset.

Kim H, Won K, Ahn M, Jun S Biomed Eng Lett. 2024; 14(3):617-630.

PMID: 38645586 PMC: 11026332. DOI: 10.1007/s13534-024-00357-4.


Developer perspectives on the ethics of AI-driven neural implants: a qualitative study.

van Stuijvenberg O, Broekman M, Wolff S, Bredenoord A, Jongsma K Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):7880.

PMID: 38570593 PMC: 10991497. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-58535-4.


Boosting brain-computer interfaces with functional electrical stimulation: potential applications in people with locked-in syndrome.

Canny E, Vansteensel M, van der Salm S, Muller-Putz G, Berezutskaya J J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2023; 20(1):157.

PMID: 37980536 PMC: 10656959. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-023-01272-y.