» Articles » PMID: 23913096

Extracorporeal Lithotripsy Endoscopically Controlled by Ureterorenoscopy (LECURS): a New Concept for the Treatment of Kidney Stones-first Clinical Experience Using Digital Ureterorenoscopes

Overview
Journal World J Urol
Specialty Urology
Date 2013 Aug 6
PMID 23913096
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility and usefulness of extracorporeal lithotripsy endoscopically controlled by simultaneous flexible ureterorenoscopy (LECURS) and combined with Holmium laser lithotripsy for kidney stones surgery.

Methods: Retrograde flexible ureteroscopy allowed stone visualization and intrarenal relocation when possible. Extracorporeal schock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) was performed under direct vision allowing constant focal zone adjustment for optimal stone fragmentation. Holmium laser lithotripsy was used simultaneously when necessary. Post-operative assessment included ultrasound at day one and abdominal CT scan 3 weeks later to evaluate for residual fragments.

Results: Six patients with kidney stones were recruited including 3 with relative contraindication to ESWL. One patient had a stone beyond an infundibular stenosis and 2 had multiple stones in a horseshoe kidney with an uretero-pelvic junction (UPJ) stricture. A 100 % stone fragmentation rate was obtained. Post-operative ultrasound was normal in 5 patients and showed slight peri-renal infiltration in the other. One patient developed an obstructive pyelonephritis requiring antibiotics and changing a double J to a ureteral catheter. No other complications were noted. Three patients (50 %) were stone free after LECURS. Three patients underwent a second-look procedure for small (<3 mm) retained residual fragments. No damage was seen with the digital ureteroscopes, laser fibers or stone baskets.

Conclusions: This initial experience with LECURS has shown to be feasible and safe. This opens the opportunity for further evaluation of this approach in order to improve outcomes of both approaches.

Citing Articles

Perioperative Fast-Track Surgery Nursing Intervention for Patients with Kidney Stone Disease under Computed Tomography Imaging.

Chen Y, Yang J Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2023; 2023:1101388.

PMID: 36793497 PMC: 9925241. DOI: 10.1155/2023/1101388.


Invited review: the tale of ECIRS (Endoscopic Combined IntraRenal Surgery) in the Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia position.

Scoffone C, Cracco C Urolithiasis. 2017; 46(1):115-123.

PMID: 29189885 DOI: 10.1007/s00240-017-1015-9.


Retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal stones - Part 2.

Kilic O, Akand M, Van Cleynenbreugel B Turk J Urol. 2017; 43(3):252-260.

PMID: 28861294 PMC: 5562241. DOI: 10.5152/tud.2017.22697.


Current status of flexible ureteroscopy in urology.

Cho S Korean J Urol. 2015; 56(10):680-8.

PMID: 26495068 PMC: 4610894. DOI: 10.4111/kju.2015.56.10.680.

References
1.
Hafron J, Fogarty J, Boczko J, Hoenig D . Combined ureterorenoscopy and shockwave lithotripsy for large renal stone burden: an alternative to percutaneous nephrolithotomy?. J Endourol. 2005; 19(4):464-8. DOI: 10.1089/end.2005.19.464. View

2.
Cohen J, Cohen S, Grasso M . Ureteropyeloscopic treatment of large, complex intrarenal and proximal ureteral calculi. BJU Int. 2012; 111(3 Pt B):E127-31. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11352.x. View

3.
Mendez-Probst C, Fernadez A, Erdeljan P, Vanjecek M, Cadieux P, Razvi H . Third prize: the impact of fluid environment manipulation on shockwave lithotripsy artificial calculi fragmentation rates. J Endourol. 2011; 25(3):397-401. DOI: 10.1089/end.2010.0242. View

4.
Hoznek A, Rode J, Ouzaid I, Faraj B, Kimuli M, De La Taille A . Modified supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy for large kidney and ureteral stones: technique and results. Eur Urol. 2011; 61(1):164-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.04.031. View

5.
Ng Y, Somani B, Dennison A, Kata S, Nabi G, Brown S . Irrigant flow and intrarenal pressure during flexible ureteroscopy: the effect of different access sheaths, working channel instruments, and hydrostatic pressure. J Endourol. 2010; 24(12):1915-20. DOI: 10.1089/end.2010.0188. View