» Articles » PMID: 23907234

Site-specific Basicities Regulate Molecular Recognition in Receptor Binding: in Silico Docking of Thyroid Hormones

Overview
Journal Eur Biophys J
Specialty Biophysics
Date 2013 Aug 3
PMID 23907234
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Interactions between thyroid hormone α and β receptors and the eight protonation microspecies of each of the main thyroid hormones (thyroxine, liothyronine, and reverse liothyronine) were investigated and quantitated by molecular modeling. Flexible docking of the various protonation forms of thyroid hormones and high-affinity thyromimetics to the two thyroid receptors was carried out. In this method the role of the ionization state of each basic site could be studied in the composite process of molecular recognition. Our results quantitate at the molecular level how the ionization state and the charge distribution influence the protein binding. The anionic form of the carboxyl group (i.e., carboxylate site) is essential for protein binding, whereas the protonated form of amino group worsens the binding. The protonation state of the phenolate plays a less important role in the receptor affinity; its protonation, however, alters the electron density and the concomitant stacking propensity of the aromatic rings, resulting in a different binding score. The combined results of docking and microspeciation studies show that microspecies with the highest concentration at the pH of blood are not the strongest binding ones. The calculated binding free energy values can be well interpreted in terms of the interactions between the actual sites of the microspecies and the receptor amino acids. Our docking results were validated and compared with biological data from the literature. Since the thyroid hormone receptors influence several physiologic functions, such as metabolic rate, cholesterol and triglyceride levels, and heart frequency, our binding results provide a molecular basis for drug design and development in related therapeutic indications.

Citing Articles

Correlations of Free Thyroid Hormones Measured by Tandem Mass Spectrometry and Immunoassay in Dogs.

Sasso R, Siniscalchi M, dIngeo S, Ventriglia G, Bitetto C, Quaranta A Animals (Basel). 2025; 15(5).

PMID: 40075972 PMC: 11899353. DOI: 10.3390/ani15050689.


Glutathione-Related Enzymes and Proteins: A Review.

Vaskova J, Kocan L, Vasko L, Perjesi P Molecules. 2023; 28(3).

PMID: 36771108 PMC: 9919958. DOI: 10.3390/molecules28031447.


Computation of pH-dependent binding free energies.

Kim M, McCammon J Biopolymers. 2015; 105(1):43-9.

PMID: 26202905 PMC: 4623928. DOI: 10.1002/bip.22702.

References
1.
Park M, Gao C, Stern H . Estimating binding affinities by docking/scoring methods using variable protonation states. Proteins. 2010; 79(1):304-14. DOI: 10.1002/prot.22883. View

2.
Raval S, Raval P, Bandyopadhyay D, Soni K, Yevale D, Jogiya D . Design and synthesis of novel 3-hydroxy-cyclobut-3-ene-1,2-dione derivatives as thyroid hormone receptor beta (TR-beta) selective ligands. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2008; 18(14):3919-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2008.06.038. View

3.
Bartalena L . Recent achievements in studies on thyroid hormone-binding proteins. Endocr Rev. 1990; 11(1):47-64. DOI: 10.1210/edrv-11-1-47. View

4.
Friesner R, Murphy R, Repasky M, Frye L, Greenwood J, Halgren T . Extra precision glide: docking and scoring incorporating a model of hydrophobic enclosure for protein-ligand complexes. J Med Chem. 2006; 49(21):6177-96. DOI: 10.1021/jm051256o. View

5.
Sandler B, Webb P, Apriletti J, Huber B, Togashi M, Cunha Lima S . Thyroxine-thyroid hormone receptor interactions. J Biol Chem. 2004; 279(53):55801-8. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M410124200. View