» Articles » PMID: 23899356

Ciprofloxacin Prophylaxis in High Risk Neutropenic Patients: Effects on Outcomes, Antimicrobial Therapy and Resistance

Overview
Journal BMC Infect Dis
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2013 Aug 1
PMID 23899356
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The use of quinolone prophylaxis in high-risk neutropenic patients is considered standard of care but the development of resistance is a concern. Previous studies have focused mainly on quinolone resistance among patients receiving prophylaxis, with very few data reporting its impact on the hospital microbial epidemiology.

Methods: We analyzed a cohort of 329 episodes of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in adults, and compared two periods: 2005 (period 1, no prophylaxis, n=110) and 2006-2008 (period 2, ciprofloxacin prophylaxis, n=219). Outcomes analyzed were the frequency of febrile neutropenia, bacteremia, duration of antibiotic therapy and hospitalization, and antimicrobial resistance to ciprofloxacin and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase [ESBL] production. We analyzed resistance rates (by patients-day) in the cohort, as well as in other patients (neutropenic and non-neutropenic, 11,975 patients-day) admitted to the hematology unit in the same period, taking into consideration the general resistance patterns in the hospital.

Results: Quinolone prophylaxis (period 2) resulted in fewer episodes of febrile neutropenia (159/219 [73%] vs. 102/110 [93%], Chi-square 18.09, p = 0.00002), and bacteremia (49/219 [22] vs. 36/110 [33%], Chi-square 4.10, p = 0.04), shorter duration of antibiotic therapy (p = 0.0002) and hospitalization (p = 0.002), but more frequent use of carbapenems (79/219 [36%] vs. 15/110 [14%], Chi-square 18.06, p = 0.0002). In addition, period 2 was associated with higher rates of quinolone resistance (6.77 vs. 3.02 per 1,000 patients-day, p = 0.03). The rate of ESBL-producing enterobacteria in the two periods was slightly higher in patients receiving quinolone prophylaxis (1.27 vs. 0.38 per 1,000 patients-day, p = 0.26) as well as in the hematology unit overall (1.59 vs. 0.53 per 1,000 patients-day, p = 0.08), but remained stable in the whole hospital (0.53 vs. 0.56 per 1,000 patients-day, p = 0.74).

Conclusions: Ciprofloxacin prophylaxis was beneficial in high risk neutropenic patients, but important modifications in the prescription of carbapenems and on antimicrobial resistance patterns of isolates were observed. The importance of hospital or ward ecology must be taken into account when deciding for quinolone prophylaxis in high-risk neutropenic patients.

Citing Articles

The effect of ciprofloxacin prophylaxis during haematopoietic cell transplantation on infection episodes, exposure to treatment antimicrobials and antimicrobial resistance: a single-centre retrospective cohort study.

Baltas I, Kavallieros K, Konstantinou G, Koutoumanou E, Gibani M, Gilchrist M JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2024; 6(1):dlae010.

PMID: 38304723 PMC: 10833646. DOI: 10.1093/jacamr/dlae010.


The Dutch Working Party on Antibiotic Policy (SWAB) Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Management of Febrile Neutropenia in Patients with Cancer.

de la Court J, Bruns A, Roukens A, Baas I, van Steeg K, Toren-Wielema M Infect Dis Ther. 2022; 11(6):2063-2098.

PMID: 36229765 PMC: 9669256. DOI: 10.1007/s40121-022-00700-1.


Bloodstream Infections in Patients with Hematologic Diseases: Causative Organisms and Factors Associated with Resistance.

Choi H, Ahn H, Lee R, Cho S, Lee D Infect Chemother. 2022; 54(2):340-352.

PMID: 35794719 PMC: 9259903. DOI: 10.3947/ic.2022.0069.


Efficacy of Tigecycline as Salvage Therapy in Multidrug-Resistant Febrile Neutropenia in Patients with Acute Leukemia-A Single Center Analysis.

Modemann F, Harterich S, Schulze Zur Wiesch J, Rohde H, Lindeman N, Bokemeyer C Antibiotics (Basel). 2022; 11(2).

PMID: 35203731 PMC: 8868403. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics11020128.


Periodontal inflamed surface area in oral cavity associated with febrile neutropenia in patients with hematologic malignancy undergoing chemotherapy.

Nishi H, Ohta K, Kuramoto Y, Shigeishi H, Obayashi T, Yoshioka Y Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):2483.

PMID: 35169215 PMC: 8847642. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-06485-0.


References
1.
Leibovici L, Paul M, Cullen M, Bucaneve G, Gafter-Gvili A, Fraser A . Antibiotic prophylaxis in neutropenic patients: new evidence, practical decisions. Cancer. 2006; 107(8):1743-51. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.22205. View

2.
Gafter-Gvili A, Fraser A, Paul M, Leibovici L . Meta-analysis: antibiotic prophylaxis reduces mortality in neutropenic patients. Ann Intern Med. 2005; 142(12 Pt 1):979-95. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-142-12_part_1-200506210-00008. View

3.
Paterson D, Mulazimoglu L, Casellas J, Ko W, Goossens H, von Gottberg A . Epidemiology of ciprofloxacin resistance and its relationship to extended-spectrum beta-lactamase production in Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates causing bacteremia. Clin Infect Dis. 2000; 30(3):473-8. DOI: 10.1086/313719. View

4.
Reuter S, Kern W, Sigge A, Dohner H, Marre R, Kern P . Impact of fluoroquinolone prophylaxis on reduced infection-related mortality among patients with neutropenia and hematologic malignancies. Clin Infect Dis. 2005; 40(8):1087-93. DOI: 10.1086/428732. View

5.
Freifeld A, Bow E, Sepkowitz K, Boeckh M, Ito J, Mullen C . Clinical practice guideline for the use of antimicrobial agents in neutropenic patients with cancer: 2010 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2011; 52(4):427-31. DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciq147. View