» Articles » PMID: 23898369

Comparative Effectiveness of Traditional Chemoembolization with or Without Sorafenib for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Overview
Journal World J Hepatol
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2013 Jul 31
PMID 23898369
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: To compare the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) with associated adverse events (AE) in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) + sorafenib vs TACE alone.

Methods: In this retrospective cohort study we collected data on all consecutive patients with a diagnosis of unresectable HCC between 2007 and 2011 who had been treated with TACE + sorafenib or TACE alone. We hypothesized that the combination therapy is superior to TACE alone in improving the survival in these patients. Data extracted included patient's demographics, etiology of liver disease, histology of HCC, stage of liver disease with respect to model of end stage liver disease score and Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) classification and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging for HCC. Computed tomography scan findings, alpha fetoprotein levels, number of treatments and related AE were also recorded and analyzed.

Results: Of the 43 patients who met inclusion criteria, 13 were treated with TACE + sorafenib and 30 with TACE alone. There was no significant difference in median survival: 20.6 mo (95%CI: 13.4-38.4) for the TACE + sorafenib and 18.3 mo (95%CI: 11.8-32.9) for the TACE alone (P = 0.72). There were also no statistically significant differences between groups in OS (HR = 0.82, 95%CI: 0.38-1.77; P = 0.61), PFS (HR = 0.93, 95%CI: 0.45-1.89; P = 0.83), and treatment-related toxicities (P = 0.554). CTP classification and BCLC staging for HCC were statistically significant (P = 0.001, P = 0.04 respectively) in predicting the survival in patients with HCC. The common AE observed were abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting and mild elevation of liver enzymes.

Conclusion: Combination therapy with TACE + sorafenib is safe and equally effective as TACE alone in patients with unresectable HCC. CTP classification and BCLC staging were the significant predictors of survival. Future trials with large number of patients are needed to further validate this observation.

Citing Articles

Efficacy of sorafenib combined with transarterial chemoembolization in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis.

Xu M, Zhou S, Li Y, Zhang C, Liao D, Wang X World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2025; 17(2):98927.

PMID: 39958535 PMC: 11756001. DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i2.98927.


Comparative efficacy and safety of molecular targeted agents combined with transarterial chemoembolization in the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a network meta-analysis.

Long J, Chen B, Liu Z Front Oncol. 2023; 13:1179431.

PMID: 37265792 PMC: 10230082. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1179431.


Efficacy of Transarterial Chemoembolization Combined with Molecular Targeted Agents for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Network Meta-Analysis.

Zhang Z, Wu Y, Zheng T, Chen X, Chen G, Chen H Cancers (Basel). 2022; 14(15).

PMID: 35954373 PMC: 9367476. DOI: 10.3390/cancers14153710.


A systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization combined with radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of primary liver cancer.

Yu Y, Fu J, Xia P, Chu C Transl Cancer Res. 2022; 11(5):1297-1308.

PMID: 35706808 PMC: 9189242. DOI: 10.21037/tcr-22-816.


Transarterial chemoembolization with pirarubicin-eluting microspheres in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: Preliminary results.

Bai M, Pan T, Zhou C, Li M, Chen J, Zeng Z J Interv Med. 2021; 2(2):69-77.

PMID: 34805876 PMC: 8562294. DOI: 10.1016/j.jimed.2019.09.005.


References
1.
Dufour J, Hoppe H, Heim M, Helbling B, Maurhofer O, Szucs-Farkas Z . Continuous administration of sorafenib in combination with transarterial chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: results of a phase I study. Oncologist. 2010; 15(11):1198-204. PMC: 3227910. DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2010-0180. View

2.
Park J, Koh Y, Kim H, Kim H, An S, Choi J . Phase II study of concurrent transarterial chemoembolization and sorafenib in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2012; 56(6):1336-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2012.01.006. View

3.
Llovet J, Real M, Montana X, Planas R, Coll S, Aponte J . Arterial embolisation or chemoembolisation versus symptomatic treatment in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2002; 359(9319):1734-9. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08649-X. View

4.
Yamanaka K, Hatano E, Kitamura K, Iida T, Ishii T, Machimito T . Early evaluation of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization-refractory hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastroenterol. 2011; 47(3):343-6. DOI: 10.1007/s00535-011-0511-x. View

5.
Copur M . Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2008; 359(23):2498. View