» Articles » PMID: 23898350

One-stage Revision Arthroplasty for Infected Hip Replacements

Overview
Journal Open Orthop J
Publisher Bentham Open
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2013 Jul 31
PMID 23898350
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Infection remains a serious complication after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and is a leading cause of hip revision surgery. It is currently accepted that removal of the prosthesis is essential to curing an infection when facing chronic PJIs with prosthesis loosening. In order to avoid the disadvantages of a two-stage approach, some authors have proposed a one-stage hip revision for the treatment of hip prosthesis infection in selected patients using not only antibiotic-loaded cemented components but also cementless implant. In the case of a one-stage procedure, the patient is exposed to a single major procedure and therefore lower cumulative perioperative risk. A functional prosthesis replacement is completed without exposure to the complications associated with spacers. In addition, there are also benefits both financially and in terms of resource allocation.

Citing Articles

Revision Hip Arthroplasty in Patient with Acetabulum Migration into Subperitoneal Space-A Case Report.

Kotela A, Lorkowski J, Chmielewski D, Grodzik M, Kotela I Medicina (Kaunas). 2021; 57(1).

PMID: 33396344 PMC: 7824657. DOI: 10.3390/medicina57010030.


Blood loss and allogeneic transfusion for surgical treatment of periprosthetic joint infection: a comparison of one- vs. two-stage exchange total hip arthroplasty.

Sharqzad A, Cavalheiro C, Zahar A, Lausmann C, Gehrke T, Kendoff D Int Orthop. 2018; 43(9):2025-2030.

PMID: 30187096 DOI: 10.1007/s00264-018-4137-y.


Management of the Infected Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Lopez D, Leach I, Moore E, Norrish A Indian J Orthop. 2017; 51(4):397-404.

PMID: 28790468 PMC: 5525520. DOI: 10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_307_16.

References
1.
Martinez-Pastor J, Munoz-Mahamud E, Vilchez F, Garcia-Ramiro S, Bori G, Sierra J . Outcome of acute prosthetic joint infections due to gram-negative bacilli treated with open debridement and retention of the prosthesis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009; 53(11):4772-7. PMC: 2772308. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00188-09. View

2.
Ure K, Amstutz H, Nasser S, Schmalzried T . Direct-exchange arthroplasty for the treatment of infection after total hip replacement. An average ten-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998; 80(7):961-8. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199807000-00004. View

3.
Buchholz H, Elson R, Engelbrecht E, LODENKAMPER H, Rottger J, Siegel A . Management of deep infection of total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1981; 63-B(3):342-53. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.63B3.7021561. View

4.
Winkler H . Rationale for one stage exchange of infected hip replacement using uncemented implants and antibiotic impregnated bone graft. Int J Med Sci. 2009; 6(5):247-52. PMC: 2755120. DOI: 10.7150/ijms.6.247. View

5.
Fuster D, Duch J, Soriano A, Garcia S, Setoain X, Bori G . [Potential use of bone marrow scintigraphy in suspected prosthetic hip infection evaluated with 99mTc-HMPAO-leukocytes]. Rev Esp Med Nucl. 2008; 27(6):430-5. View