Origin of the Linearity No Threshold (LNT) Dose-response Concept
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
This paper identifies the origin of the linearity at low-dose concept [i.e., linear no threshold (LNT)] for ionizing radiation-induced mutation. After the discovery of X-ray-induced mutations, Olson and Lewis (Nature 121(3052):673-674, 1928) proposed that cosmic/terrestrial radiation-induced mutations provide the principal mechanism for the induction of heritable traits, providing the driving force for evolution. For this concept to be general, a LNT dose relationship was assumed, with genetic damage proportional to the energy absorbed. Subsequent studies suggested a linear dose response for ionizing radiation-induced mutations (Hanson and Heys in Am Nat 63(686):201-213, 1929; Oliver in Science 71:44-46, 1930), supporting the evolutionary hypothesis. Based on an evaluation of spontaneous and ionizing radiation-induced mutation with Drosophila, Muller argued that background radiation had a negligible impact on spontaneous mutation, discrediting the ionizing radiation-based evolutionary hypothesis. Nonetheless, an expanded set of mutation dose-response observations provided a basis for collaboration between theoretical physicists (Max Delbruck and Gunter Zimmer) and the radiation geneticist Nicolai Timoféeff-Ressovsky. They developed interrelated physical science-based genetics perspectives including a biophysical model of the gene, a radiation-induced gene mutation target theory and the single-hit hypothesis of radiation-induced mutation, which, when integrated, provided the theoretical mechanism and mathematical basis for the LNT model. The LNT concept became accepted by radiation geneticists and recommended by national/international advisory committees for risk assessment of ionizing radiation-induced mutational damage/cancer from the mid-1950s to the present. The LNT concept was later generalized to chemical carcinogen risk assessment and used by public health and regulatory agencies worldwide.
Mendonca R, Estrela C, Bueno M, Carvalho T, Estrela L, Chilvarquer I Braz Oral Res. 2025; 39:e14.
PMID: 39936713 PMC: 11808696. DOI: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2025.vol39.014.
Confirmation that Hermann Muller was dishonest in his Nobel Prize Lecture.
Calabrese E Arch Toxicol. 2023; 97(11):2999-3003.
PMID: 37665363 DOI: 10.1007/s00204-023-03566-5.
Han D, Cai J, Heus A, Heuvelmans M, Imkamp K, Dorrius M Br J Radiol. 2023; 96(1144):20220709.
PMID: 36728829 PMC: 10078877. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20220709.
Zhu S, Wang J, Zellmer L, Xu N, Liu M, Hu Y J Cancer. 2022; 13(9):2810-2843.
PMID: 35912015 PMC: 9330459. DOI: 10.7150/jca.72628.
Towards a toxic-free environment: perspectives for chemical risk assessment approaches.
Bonzini M, Leso V, Iavicoli I Med Lav. 2022; 113(1):e2022004.
PMID: 35226649 PMC: 8902740. DOI: 10.23749/mdl.v113i1.12748.