» Articles » PMID: 23881804

Risk of Gastric or Peritoneal Recurrence, and Long-term Outcomes, Following Pancreatic Cancer Resection with Preoperative Endosonographically Guided Fine Needle Aspiration

Overview
Journal Endoscopy
Date 2013 Jul 25
PMID 23881804
Citations 37
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Study Aims: There have been concerns regarding tumor cell seeding along the needle track or within the peritoneum caused by preoperative endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA). The aim of this study was to evaluate whether preoperative EUS-FNA is associated with increased risk of stomach/peritoneal recurrence and whether the procedure affects long term survival.

Methods: The records of patients diagnosed with malignant solid and cystic pancreatic neoplasms who underwent surgery with curative intent between 1996 and 2012 were reviewed.

Results: A total of 256 patients with similar baseline characteristics were included: 48 patients in the non-EUS-FNA group and 208 in the EUS-FNA group. Recurrence data were available for 207 patients. Median length of follow-up was 23 months (range 0 - 111 months). A total of 19 patients had gastric or peritoneal recurrence; 6 (15.4 %) in the non-EUS-FNA group vs. 13 (7.7 %) in the EUS-FNA group (P = 0.21). Three patients had recurrence in the stomach wall: one (2.6 %) patient in the non-EUS-FNA group vs. two patients (1.2 %) in EUS-FNA group (P = 0.46). A total of 16 patients had peritoneal recurrence: 5 patients (12.8 %) in the non-EUS-FNA group and 11 patients (6.5 %) in the EUS-FNA group (P = 0.19). In a multivariate analysis, undergoing EUS-FNA was not associated with increased cancer recurrence or decreased overall survival.

Conclusion: Pre-operative EUS-FNA was not associated with an increased rate of gastric or peritoneal cancer recurrence in patients with resected pancreatic cancer. Two patients had gastric wall recurrence following the procedure, but this may be explained by direct tumor extension. This suggests that EUS-FNA is not associated with an increased risk of needle track seeding.

Citing Articles

An Approach to and Treatment of Indeterminate Biliary Strictures: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature.

Impellizzeri G, Grassini M, Donato G, De Angelis C, Pagano N J Clin Med. 2025; 14(1.

PMID: 39797112 PMC: 11721181. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14010029.


Methods to increase the diagnostic efficiency of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for solid pancreatic lesions: An updated review.

Yang X, Liu Z, Zhou X, Yang F, Ma W, Sun X World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2024; 16(3):117-125.

PMID: 38577648 PMC: 10989249. DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v16.i3.117.


Unraveling the enigma: A comprehensive review of solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas.

Xu Y, Fu D, Yang F World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2024; 16(3):614-629.

PMID: 38577449 PMC: 10989376. DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i3.614.


Same-session endoscopic diagnosis and symptom palliation in pancreato-biliary malignancies: Clinical impact of rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE).

Vanella G, DellAnna G, Cosenza A, Pedica F, Petrone M, Mariani A Endosc Int Open. 2024; 12(2):E297-E306.

PMID: 38420151 PMC: 10901646. DOI: 10.1055/a-2251-3551.


Diagnostic performance and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition of gallbladder lesions: A systematic review with meta-analysis.

Giri S, Angadi S, Afzalpurkar S, Harindranath S, Varghese J, Sundaram S Indian J Gastroenterol. 2023; 42(4):467-474.

PMID: 37280409 DOI: 10.1007/s12664-023-01374-4.