» Articles » PMID: 23868076

The C-terminal Half of the α2C-adrenoceptor Determines the Receptor's Membrane Expression Level and Drug Selectivity

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2013 Jul 23
PMID 23868076
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In tissues as well as in transfected cells, α2C-adrenoceptors show poorer expression levels compared to α2A-adrenoceptors. In order to characterize which regions of the α2C-adrenoceptor are involved in regulating the expression of binding-competent receptors at the plasma membrane, six chimeric α2A-/α2C-adrenoceptors were constructed. The wild-type α2A- and α2C-adrenoceptors and the six chimeric α2A-/α2C-adrenoceptors were transiently transfected into human embryonic kidney 293 (HEK293) cells, and the expression levels were investigated by radioligand binding. The results show that the C-terminal half of the α2C-adrenoceptor, ranging from the second extracellular loop to the C-terminus, is the main determinant of the low expression level of binding-competent α2C-adrenoceptors in HEK293 cell membranes. The so-called retention signal in the N-terminus of the α2C-adrenoceptor had a less profound effect on the expression levels of the chimeric receptors. For seven drugs competing for [(3)H]-RX821002 binding, the K i values were determined at the wild-type α2A- and α2C-adrenoceptors and at four of the chimeric α2A-/α2C-adrenoceptors. The results show that the α2C- over α2A-selectivity of spiroxatrine, spiperone, clozapine, MK912, and chlorpromazine, as well as the α2A- over α2C-selectivity of BRL44408, resides mainly in the C-terminal half of the receptors. To some extent, the region comprising the N-terminal half of the receptors contributed to the α2C-selectivity of spiperone, clozapine, and chlorpromazine.

Citing Articles

Perspective on the role of the N-terminal tail of the α2C-adrenoceptor.

Uhlen S, Jahnsen J Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2014; 387(10):1013-4.

PMID: 25110140 DOI: 10.1007/s00210-014-1029-6.


Expression and trafficking of functional G protein-coupled receptors are related, yet distinct, concepts.

Hurt C, Angelotti T Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2014; 387(10):1009-12.

PMID: 25103411 DOI: 10.1007/s00210-014-1028-7.

References
1.
Foord S, Bonner T, Neubig R, Rosser E, Pin J, Davenport A . International Union of Pharmacology. XLVI. G protein-coupled receptor list. Pharmacol Rev. 2005; 57(2):279-88. DOI: 10.1124/pr.57.2.5. View

2.
von Zastrow M, Link R, Daunt D, Barsh G, Kobilka B . Subtype-specific differences in the intracellular sorting of G protein-coupled receptors. J Biol Chem. 1993; 268(2):763-6. View

3.
Hurt C, Ho V, Angelotti T . Systematic and quantitative analysis of G protein-coupled receptor trafficking motifs. Methods Enzymol. 2013; 521:171-87. PMC: 4024061. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-391862-8.00009-0. View

4.
Filipeanu C, de Vries R, Danser A, Kapusta D . Modulation of α(2C) adrenergic receptor temperature-sensitive trafficking by HSP90. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2010; 1813(2):346-57. PMC: 3148834. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2010.11.020. View

5.
Angelotti T, Daunt D, Shcherbakova O, Kobilka B, Hurt C . Regulation of G-protein coupled receptor traffic by an evolutionary conserved hydrophobic signal. Traffic. 2010; 11(4):560-78. PMC: 2919199. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2010.01033.x. View