The Impact of the Virtual Ophthalmology Clinic on Medical Students' Learning: a Randomised Controlled Trial

Overview

Journal Eye (Lond)

Specialty Ophthalmology

Date 2013 Jul 23

PMID 23867718

Citations 26

Authors

T Succar

G Zebington

F Billson

K Byth

S Barrie

P McCluskey

J Grigg

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Aim: The Virtual Ophthalmology Clinic (VOC) is an interactive web-based teaching module, with special emphasis on history taking and clinical reasoning skills. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of VOC on medical students' learning.

Methods: A randomised controlled trial (RCT) was conducted with medical students from the University of Sydney (n=188) who were randomly assigned into either an experimental (n=93) or a control group (n=95). A pre- and post-test and student satisfaction questionnaire were administered. Twelve months later a follow-up test was conducted to determine the long-term retention rate of graduates.

Results: There was a statistically significant (P<0.001) within-subject improvement pre- to post rotation in the number of correctly answered questions for both the control and experimental groups (mean improvement for control 10%, 95% CI 1.3-2.6, and for experimental 17.5%, 95% CI 3.0-4.0). The improvement was significantly greater in the experimental group (mean difference in improvement between groups 7.5%, 95% CI 0.8-2.3, P<0.001). At 12 months follow-up testing, the experimental group scored on average 1.6 (8%) (95%CI 0.4 to 2.7, P=0.007) higher than the controls.

Conclusion: On the basis of a statistically significant improvement in academic performance and highly positive student feedback, the implementation of VOC may provide a means to address challenges to ophthalmic learning outcomes in an already crowded medical curriculum.

Citing Articles

Ophthalmology focus for the undergraduate student: a generic overview and outlook on global perspectives of experiential learning at medical schools.

Varughese M, Kalidindi S Eye (Lond). 2024; 39(4):624-627.

PMID: 39623110 PMC: 11885541. DOI: 10.1038/s41433-024-03521-3.

The application of novel techniques in ophthalmology education.

Jiang Y, Jiang H, Yang Z, Li Y, Chen Y Front Med (Lausanne). 2024; 11:1459097.

PMID: 39610687 PMC: 11602297. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1459097.

What Happened to Simulation-Based Education in Outpatient Setting in The 21 Century: A Scoping Review.

Barzegar M, Boushehri E, Amini M, Faghihi S, Zarifsanaiey N, Daneshvar M J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2024; 12(2):69-78.

PMID: 38660435 PMC: 11036317. DOI: 10.30476/JAMP.2023.100297.1885.

Virtual patients versus standardized patients for improving clinical reasoning skills in ophthalmology residents. A randomized controlled trial.

Malik T, Mahboob U, Khan R, Alam R BMC Med Educ. 2024; 24(1):429.

PMID: 38649884 PMC: 11034047. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-024-05241-4.

Evaluation of an Instructional Video and Simulation Model for Teaching Slit Lamp Examination to Medical Students.

Collis S, Yung M, Parikh N J Acad Ophthalmol (2017). 2023; 15(2):e215-e222.

PMID: 37766880 PMC: 10522417. DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1775577.

References

Devitt P, Palmer E . Computers in medical education 3: A possible tool for the assessment of clinical competence?. Aust N Z J Surg. 1998; 68(8):602-4. DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1998.tb02109.x. View

Kong J, Li X, Wang Y, Sun W, Zhang J . Effect of digital problem-based learning cases on student learning outcomes in ophthalmology courses. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009; 127(9):1211-4. DOI: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2009.110. View

Goulston K, Oates R . Changes to the University of Sydney medical curriculum. Med J Aust. 2008; 188(8):461-3. DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2008.tb01716.x. View

Carifio J, Perla R . Resolving the 50-year debate around using and misusing Likert scales. Med Educ. 2009; 42(12):1150-2. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03172.x. View

Devitt P, Cehic D, Palmer E . Computers in medical education 2. Use of a computer package to supplement the clinical experience in a surgical clerkship: an objective evaluation. Aust N Z J Surg. 1998; 68(6):428-31. DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1998.tb04793.x. View

Kuchenbecker J, Parasta A, Dick H . [Internet-based teaching and learning in ophthalmology]. Ophthalmologe. 2001; 98(10):980-4. DOI: 10.1007/s003470170049. View

Prinz A, Bolz M, Findl O . Advantage of three dimensional animated teaching over traditional surgical videos for teaching ophthalmic surgery: a randomised study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005; 89(11):1495-9. PMC: 1772942. DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2005.075077. View

Dunning T, Martin M . Developing a questionnaire: some methodological issues. Aust J Adv Nurs. 1996; 14(2):31-8. View

Dhein C, Noxon J, Deykin A . Teaching the didactic aspects of ophthalmology and dermatology using an off-site instructor. J Vet Med Educ. 2005; 32(1):57-67. DOI: 10.3138/jvme.32.1.57. View

10.

Asman P, Linden C . Internet-based assessment of medical students' ophthalmoscopy skills. Acta Ophthalmol. 2010; 88(8):854-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2009.01601.x. View

11.

Schulz K, Altman D, Moher D . CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2011; 1(2):100-7. PMC: 3043330. DOI: 10.4103/0976-500X.72352. View

12.

Jamieson S . Likert scales: how to (ab)use them. Med Educ. 2004; 38(12):1217-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.02012.x. View

13.

Devitt P, Palmer E . Computers in medical education 1: evaluation of a problem-orientated learning package. Aust N Z J Surg. 1998; 68(4):284-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1998.tb02084.x. View

14.

Pell G . Use and misuse of Likert scales. Med Educ. 2005; 39(9):970. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02237.x. View

15.

Norman G . Likert scales, levels of measurement and the "laws" of statistics. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2010; 15(5):625-32. DOI: 10.1007/s10459-010-9222-y. View

16.

Gesundheit N, Brutlag P, Youngblood P, Gunning W, Zary N, Fors U . The use of virtual patients to assess the clinical skills and reasoning of medical students: initial insights on student acceptance. Med Teach. 2009; 31(8):739-42. DOI: 10.1080/01421590903126489. View

17.

Atkinson N . Developing a questionnaire to measure perceived attributes of eHealth innovations. Am J Health Behav. 2007; 31(6):612-21. DOI: 10.5555/ajhb.2007.31.6.612. View

18.

Glittenberg C, Binder S . Using 3D computer simulations to enhance ophthalmic training. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2006; 26(1):40-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2005.00358.x. View

19.

Devitt P, Palmer E . Computer-aided learning: an overvalued educational resource?. Med Educ. 1999; 33(2):136-9. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.1999.00284.x. View

20.

Brodersen J, Torsen H . [Methodological problems of questionnaire studies. A discussion of the scientific description when developing a questionnaire]. Ugeskr Laeger. 2002; 163(50):7086-7. View