» Articles » PMID: 23851867

A 3-dimensional Anthropometric Evaluation of Facial Morphology Among Chinese and Greek Population

Overview
Date 2013 Jul 16
PMID 23851867
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: The use of 3-dimensional (3D) facial imaging has taken greater importance as orthodontists use the soft tissue paradigm in the evaluation of skeletal disproportion. Studies have shown that faces defer in populations. To date, no anthropometric evaluations have been made of Chinese and Greek faces.

Aim: The aim of this study was to compare facial morphologies of Greeks and Chinese using 3D facial anthropometric landmarks.

Materials And Methods: Three-dimensional facial images were acquired via a commercially available stereophotogrammetric camera capture system. The 3dMD face system captured 245 subjects from 2 population groups (Chinese [n = 72] and Greek [n = 173]), and each population was categorized into male and female groups for evaluation. All subjects in the group were between 18 and 30 years old and had no apparent facial anomalies. Twenty-five anthropometric landmarks were identified on the 3D faces of each subject. Soft tissue nasion was set as the "zeroed" reference landmark. Twenty landmark distances were constructed and evaluated within 3 dimensions of space. Six angles, 4 proportions, and 1 construct were also calculated. Student t test was used to analyze each data set obtained within each subgroup.

Results: Distinct facial differences were noted between the subgroups evaluated. When comparing differences of sexes in 2 populations (eg, male Greeks and male Chinese), significant differences were noted in more than 80% of the landmark distances calculated. One hundred percent of the angular were significant, and the Chinese were broader in width to height facial proportions. In evaluating the lips to the esthetic line, the Chinese population had more protrusive lips.

Conclusions: There are differences in the facial morphologies of subjects obtained from a Chinese population versus that of a Greek population.

Citing Articles

3D Analysis of the Cranial and Facial Shape in Craniosynostosis Patients: A Systematic Review.

Kurniawan M, Tio P, Abdel Alim T, Roshchupkin G, Dirven C, Pleumeekers M J Craniofac Surg. 2024; .

PMID: 38498012 PMC: 11045556. DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000010071.


Quantifying Dermatochalasis Using 3-Dimensional Photogrammetry.

Li X, Rokohl A, Fan W, Simon M, Ju X, Rosenkranz T Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023; 48(7):1288-1297.

PMID: 37945760 DOI: 10.1007/s00266-023-03738-9.


A Cross-Sectional Study to Determine and Compare the Craniofacial Anthropometric Norms in a Selected Kenyan and Chinese Population.

Sarna K, Sonigra K, Ngeow W Plast Surg (Oakv). 2023; 31(1):84-90.

PMID: 36755821 PMC: 9900043. DOI: 10.1177/22925503211024763.


Validation of the Portable Next-Generation VECTRA H2 3D Imaging System for Periocular Anthropometry.

Fan W, Guo Y, Hou X, Liu J, Li S, Ju S Front Med (Lausanne). 2022; 9:833487.

PMID: 35360740 PMC: 8962622. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.833487.


Three-dimensional evaluation of soft tissues in hyperdivergent skeletal class II females in Guangdong.

Zhang X, Zheng J, Deng J, Wen Z, Chen Z, Gan L BMC Med Imaging. 2022; 22(1):56.

PMID: 35351027 PMC: 8966193. DOI: 10.1186/s12880-022-00782-w.