» Articles » PMID: 23850474

Structural and Functional Differences Between Pheromonotropic and Melanotropic PK/PBAN Receptors

Overview
Specialties Biochemistry
Biophysics
Date 2013 Jul 16
PMID 23850474
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The pyrokinin/pheromone biosynthesis-activating neuropeptide (PK/PBAN) plays a major role in regulating a wide range of physiological processes in insects. The ubiquitous and multifunctional nature of the PK/PBAN peptide family raises many questions regarding the mechanisms by which these neuropeptides elicit their effects and the nature of the receptors that mediate their functions.

Methods: A sex pheromone gland receptor of the PK/PBAN family from Heliothis peltigera female moth and a Spodoptera littoralis larval receptor were cloned and stably expressed, and their structural models, electrostatic potentials and cellular functional properties were evaluated.

Results: Homology modeling indicated highly conserved amino-acid residues in appropriate structural positions as experimentally shown for class A G-protein coupled receptors. Structural differences could be proposed and electrostatic potentials of the two receptor models revealed net charge differences. Calcium mobilization assays demonstrated that both receptors were fully functional and could initiate extracellular calcium influx to start PK/PBAN signal transduction. Evaluation of the signaling response of both receptors to PBAN and diapause hormone (DH) revealed a highly sensitive, though differential response. Both receptors responded to PBAN whereas only Spl-PK/PBAN-R exhibited a high response toward DH.

Conclusions: The structural, electrostatic and cellular functional differences indicate that different PK/PBAN in vivo functions may be mediated by different PK/PBAN receptors and elicited by different peptide(s).

General Significance: The results advance our understanding of the mode of action of the PK/PBAN family, and might help in exploring novel high-affinity receptor-specific antagonists that can serve as a basis for the development of new families of insect-control agents.

Citing Articles

Pheromone biosynthesis activating neuropeptide family in insects: a review.

Dou X, Jurenka R Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024; 14:1274750.

PMID: 38161974 PMC: 10755894. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1274750.


Ultra low doses and biological amplification: Approaching Avogadro's number.

Calabrese E, Giordano J Pharmacol Res. 2021; 170:105738.

PMID: 34157423 PMC: 8338887. DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2021.105738.


Identification and functional characterization of the first molluscan neuromedin U receptor in the slug, Deroceras reticulatum.

Ahn S, Mc Donnell R, Corcoran J, Martin R, Choi M Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):22308.

PMID: 33339848 PMC: 7749107. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-79047-x.


Signalling in response to sub-picomolar concentrations of active compounds: Pushing the boundaries of GPCR sensitivity.

Civciristov S, Halls M Br J Pharmacol. 2019; 176(14):2382-2401.

PMID: 30801691 PMC: 6592860. DOI: 10.1111/bph.14636.


Distinct or shared actions of peptide family isoforms: II. Multiple pyrokinins exert similar effects in the lobster stomatogastric nervous system.

Dickinson P, Kurland S, Qu X, Parker B, Sreekrishnan A, Kwiatkowski M J Exp Biol. 2015; 218(Pt 18):2905-17.

PMID: 26206359 PMC: 4582171. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.124818.