» Articles » PMID: 23844724

Decision-tree Model for Predicting Outcomes After Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest in the Emergency Department

Overview
Journal Crit Care
Specialty Critical Care
Date 2013 Jul 13
PMID 23844724
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Estimation of outcomes in patients after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) soon after arrival at the hospital may help clinicians guide in-hospital strategies, particularly in the emergency department. This study aimed to develop a simple and generally applicable bedside model for predicting outcomes after cardiac arrest.

Methods: We analyzed data for 390,226 adult patients who had undergone OHCA, from a prospectively recorded nationwide Utstein-style Japanese database for 2005 through 2009. The primary end point was survival with favorable neurologic outcome (cerebral performance category (CPC) scale, categories 1 to 2 [CPC 1 to 2]) at 1 month. The secondary end point was survival at 1 month. We developed a decision-tree prediction model by using data from a 4-year period (2005 through 2008, n = 307,896), with validation by using external data from 2009 (n = 82,330).

Results: Recursive partitioning analysis of the development cohort for 10 predictors indicated that the best single predictor for survival and CPC 1 to 2 was shockable initial rhythm. The next predictors for patients with shockable initial rhythm were age (<70 years) followed by witnessed arrest and age (>70 years) followed by arrest witnessed by emergency medical services (EMS) personnel. For patients with unshockable initial rhythm, the next best predictor was witnessed arrest. A simple decision-tree prediction mode permitted stratification into four prediction groups: good, moderately good, poor, and absolutely poor. This model identified patient groups with a range from 1.2% to 30.2% for survival and from 0.3% to 23.2% for CPC 1 to 2 probabilities. Similar results were observed when this model was applied to the validation cohort.

Conclusions: On the basis of a decision-tree prediction model using four prehospital variables (shockable initial rhythm, age, witnessed arrest, and witnessed by EMS personnel), OHCA patients can be readily stratified into the four groups (good, moderately good, poor, and absolutely poor) that help predict both survival at 1 month and survival with favorable neurologic outcome at 1 month. This simple prediction model may provide clinicians with a practical bedside tool for the OHCA patient's stratification in the emergency department.

Citing Articles

A Machine Learning-Based Decision Support System for the Prognostication of Neurological Outcomes in Successfully Resuscitated Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Patients.

Lee S, Lee K, Park S, Lee S, Kim S J Clin Med. 2025; 13(24.

PMID: 39768524 PMC: 11676625. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13247600.


The ABC (Age, Bystander, and Cardiogram) score for predicting neurological outcomes of cardiac arrests without pre-hospital return of spontaneous circulation: A nationwide population-based study.

Uehara K, Tagami T, Hyodo H, Takagi G, Ohara T, Yasutake M Resusc Plus. 2024; 19:100673.

PMID: 38881598 PMC: 11177075. DOI: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100673.


Prehospital predicting factors using a decision tree model for patients with witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and an initial shockable rhythm.

Tateishi K, Saito Y, Yasufuku Y, Nakagomi A, Kitahara H, Kobayashi Y Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):16180.

PMID: 37758799 PMC: 10533815. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-43106-w.


Artificial intelligence and machine learning in prehospital emergency care: A scoping review.

Chee M, Chee M, Huang H, Mazzochi K, Taylor K, Wang H iScience. 2023; 26(8):107407.

PMID: 37609632 PMC: 10440716. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107407.


Termination-of-resuscitation rule in the emergency department for patients with refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a nationwide, population-based observational study.

Goto Y, Funada A, Maeda T, Goto Y Crit Care. 2022; 26(1):137.

PMID: 35578295 PMC: 9109290. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-022-03999-x.


References
1.
Sasson C, Rogers M, Dahl J, Kellermann A . Predictors of survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010; 3(1):63-81. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.109.889576. View

2.
Nagao T, Kinoshita K, Sakurai A, Yamaguchi J, Furukawa M, Utagawa A . Effects of bag-mask versus advanced airway ventilation for patients undergoing prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation in pre-hospital setting. J Emerg Med. 2011; 42(2):162-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2011.02.020. View

3.
Fran Hazinski M, Nolan J, Billi J, Bottiger B, Bossaert L, de Caen A . Part 1: Executive summary: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations. Circulation. 2010; 122(16 Suppl 2):S250-75. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.970897. View

4.
Lamborn K, Chang S, Prados M . Prognostic factors for survival of patients with glioblastoma: recursive partitioning analysis. Neuro Oncol. 2004; 6(3):227-35. PMC: 1871999. DOI: 10.1215/S1152851703000620. View

5.
Hayakawa K, Tasaki O, Hamasaki T, Sakai T, Shiozaki T, Nakagawa Y . Prognostic indicators and outcome prediction model for patients with return of spontaneous circulation from cardiopulmonary arrest: the Utstein Osaka Project. Resuscitation. 2011; 82(7):874-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.02.045. View