» Articles » PMID: 23843728

POINT-OF-CARE HEMATOLOGY AND COAGULATION TESTING IN PRIMARY, RURAL EMERGENCY, AND DISASTER CARE SCENARIOS

Overview
Journal Point Care
Date 2013 Jul 12
PMID 23843728
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The purpose of this article is to review current principles and criteria for obtaining Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA '88) waiver, identify existing point-of-care (POC) coagulation and hematology technologies, and analyze regulatory challenges regarding CLIA-waiver for those and future devices. CLIA '88 documentation requires tests performed by laboratories with a Certificate of Waiver to be so simple that the likelihood of erroneous results by the user is negligible, or poses no unreasonable risk of harm to the patient if performed incorrectly as determined by the Secretary of Health and Human Services. "Simple" means that the test uses unprocessed samples, has a direct read-out of test results, does not have specifications for user training, and includes instructions for confirmatory testing when advisable. Currently the CLIA-waived hematology and coagulation POC devices only test for hemoglobin (Hb), hematocrit (Hct), and prothrombin time/international normalized ratio (PT/INR). The problem with these devices is the lack of multiplexing. POC coagulation and hematology devices face challenges for obtaining a waiver. These challenges include the lack of clinical needs assessment, miniturized assays that correct for interfering substances, and assays simple enough to be combined in a multiplex platform. Several scenarios demonstrate how POC coagulation or hematology devices can improve crisis care. Industry should perform needs assessment on clinicians and emergency responders to determine which analytes to incorporate on multiplex POC coagulation and hematology devices, and produce devices that address confounding factors.

Citing Articles

Efficacy of Point-of-Care for INR Testing Compared to Standard Laboratory Methods at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Saudi Arabia.

Bhat M, Abuzied Y, Fagih Z, Wani T, Gawan I, Andalay E Glob J Qual Saf Healthc. 2023; 3(3):98-104.

PMID: 37275600 PMC: 10234087. DOI: 10.36401/JQSH-19-36.


Prospective Comparison of Point-of-Care Device and Standard Analyzer for Monitoring of International Normalized Ratio in Outpatient Oral Anticoagulant Clinic.

Moiz B, Rashid A, Hasan M, Jafri L, Raheem A Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2018; 24(7):1153-1158.

PMID: 29374969 PMC: 6714735. DOI: 10.1177/1076029617752247.


Recent Developments in Magnetic Diagnostic Systems.

Lee H, Shin T, Cheon J, Weissleder R Chem Rev. 2015; 115(19):10690-724.

PMID: 26258867 PMC: 5791529. DOI: 10.1021/cr500698d.


A Pharmacist-Led Point-of-Care INR Clinic: Optimizing Care in a Family Health Team Setting.

Rossiter J, Soor G, Telner D, Aliarzadeh B, Lake J Int J Family Med. 2014; 2013:691454.

PMID: 24455250 PMC: 3876693. DOI: 10.1155/2013/691454.

References
1.
Weinstock D, Case Jr C, Bader J, Chao N, Coleman C, Hatchett R . Radiologic and nuclear events: contingency planning for hematologists/oncologists. Blood. 2008; 111(12):5440-5. PMC: 2424146. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2008-01-134817. View

2.
Huppert J, Hesse E, Gaydos C . What's the Point? How Point-of-Care STI Tests Can Impact Infected Patients. Point Care. 2010; 9(1):36-46. PMC: 2853950. DOI: 10.1097/POC.0b013e3181d2d8cc. View

3.
Hermansen M . Nucleated red blood cells in the fetus and newborn. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2001; 84(3):F211-5. PMC: 1721260. DOI: 10.1136/fn.84.3.f211. View

4.
van den Brule J, Romkes J, Brouwer M, Noyez L . An error in the CoaguChek S device results in prosthetic heart valve thrombosis. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010; 11(1):123-4. DOI: 10.1510/icvts.2010.233288. View

5.
Lippi G, Favaloro E . Unsuspected coagulopathy rarely prevents IV thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke. Neurology. 2010; 74(18):1477. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181d8a414. View