» Articles » PMID: 23841987

Facilitating Out-of-home Caregiving Through Health Information Technology: Survey of Informal Caregivers' Current Practices, Interests, and Perceived Barriers

Overview
Publisher JMIR Publications
Date 2013 Jul 12
PMID 23841987
Citations 35
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Many patients with chronic conditions are supported by out-of-home informal caregivers-family members, friends, and other individuals who provide care and support without pay-who, if armed with effective consumer health information technology, could inexpensively facilitate their care.

Objective: We sought to understand caregivers' use of, interest in, and perceived barriers to health information technology for out-of-home caregiving.

Methods: We conducted 2 sequential Web-based surveys with a national sample of individuals who provide out-of-home caregiving to an adult family member or friend with a chronic illness. We queried respondents about their use of health information technology for out-of-home caregiving and used multivariable regression to investigate caregiver and care-recipient characteristics associated with caregivers' technology use for caregiving.

Results: Among 316 out-of-home caregiver respondents, 34.5% (109/316) reported using health information technology for caregiving activities. The likelihood of a caregiver using technology increased significantly with intensity of caregiving (as measured by number of out-of-home caregiving activities). Compared with very low intensity caregivers, the adjusted odds ratio (OR) of technology use was 1.88 (95% CI 1.01-3.50) for low intensity caregivers, 2.39 (95% CI 1.11-5.15) for moderate intensity caregivers, and 3.70 (95% CI 1.62-8.45) for high intensity caregivers. Over 70% (149/207) of technology nonusers reported interest in using technology in the future to support caregiving. The most commonly cited barriers to technology use for caregiving were health system privacy rules that restrict access to care-recipients' health information and lack of familiarity with programs or websites that facilitate out-of-home caregiving.

Conclusions: Health information technology use for out-of-home caregiving is common, especially among individuals who provide more intense caregiving. Health care systems can address the mismatch between caregivers' interest in and use of technology by modifying privacy policies that impede information exchange.

Citing Articles

Effect of Medication Management at Home via Pharmacist-Led Home Televisits: Protocol for a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.

Hossain S, Samant A, Balsamo B, Hawley C, Zanchelli M, Zhu C JMIR Res Protoc. 2025; 14:e65141.

PMID: 39908544 PMC: 11840363. DOI: 10.2196/65141.


An Evidence-Based IT Program With Chatbot to Support Caregiving and Clinical Care for People With Dementia: The CareHeroes Development and Usability Pilot.

Ruggiano N, Brown E, Clarke P, Hristidis V, Roberts L, Framil Suarez C JMIR Aging. 2024; 7:e57308.

PMID: 39727199 PMC: 11684532. DOI: 10.2196/57308.


Care partners and consumer health information technology: A framework to guide systems-level initiatives in support of digital health equity.

Wolff J, Wec A, Peereboom D, Gleason K, Amjad H, Burgdorf J Learn Health Syst. 2024; 8(Suppl 1):e10408.

PMID: 38883870 PMC: 11176584. DOI: 10.1002/lrh2.10408.


Care Partner Engagement in Secure Messaging Between Patients With Diabetes and Their Clinicians: Cohort Study.

Semere W, Karter A, Lyles C, Reed M, Karliner L, Kaplan C JMIR Diabetes. 2024; 9:e49491.

PMID: 38335020 PMC: 10891488. DOI: 10.2196/49491.


Connecting the disconnected: Leveraging an in-home team member for video visits for older adults.

Hawley C, Wagner C, Venegas M, Genovese N, Triantafylidis L, McCullough M J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023; 72(5):1408-1419.

PMID: 37960887 PMC: 11188997. DOI: 10.1111/jgs.18663.


References
1.
Tang P, Ash J, Bates D, Overhage J, Sands D . Personal health records: definitions, benefits, and strategies for overcoming barriers to adoption. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005; 13(2):121-6. PMC: 1447551. DOI: 10.1197/jamia.M2025. View

2.
Rosland A, Heisler M, Janevic M, Connell C, Langa K, Kerr E . Current and potential support for chronic disease management in the United States: the perspective of family and friends of chronically ill adults. Fam Syst Health. 2013; 31(2):119-31. PMC: 3762580. DOI: 10.1037/a0031535. View

3.
Koerin B, Harrigan M, Secret M . Eldercare and employed caregivers: a public/private responsibility?. J Gerontol Soc Work. 2008; 51(1-2):143-61. DOI: 10.1080/01634370801967612. View

4.
Donelan K, Hill C, Hoffman C, Scoles K, Feldman P, Levine C . Challenged to care: informal caregivers in a changing health system. Health Aff (Millwood). 2002; 21(4):222-31. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.21.4.222. View

5.
Pagliari C, Detmer D, Singleton P . Potential of electronic personal health records. BMJ. 2007; 335(7615):330-3. PMC: 1949437. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39279.482963.AD. View