» Articles » PMID: 23839801

Validation of a Proposed Warfarin Dosing Algorithm Based on the Genetic Make-up of Egyptian Patients

Overview
Journal Mol Diagn Ther
Date 2013 Jul 11
PMID 23839801
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Warfarin is the most frequently prescribed oral anticoagulant worldwide. Due to its narrow therapeutic index and inter-patient variability in dose requirement, this drug has been considered an ideal target for personalised medicine. Several warfarin dosing algorithms have been proposed to tailor the warfarin dosage in the European, Asian and African-American populations. However, minimal interest was directed towards Middle East countries. The factors affecting warfarin dose requirement could be different in patients from different geographical and ethnic groups, limiting the value of published dosing algorithms.

Objective: The first objective of this study was to examine the contribution of genetic and nongenetic factors on the variability of warfarin dose requirements in the Egyptian population using an easy, cost-effective and rapid analysis of vitamin K epoxide reductase complex subunit 1 (VKORC1) and cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C9 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping of patients. A second objective was to develop and validate an algorithm for warfarin dose prediction that is tailored to Egyptian patients.

Methods: Eighty-four patients, 41 males and 43 females, with a median (25th-75th percentiles) age of 39 (31-48) years were recruited in this study. Fifty patients whose international normalised ratio (INR) was in the range of 2-3 were allocated to a study cohort. SYBR Green-based multiplex allele-specific real-time PCR was used for genotyping of CYP2C9 (1075A>C) and VKORC1 (1173C>T) polymorphisms. Linear regression analysis, including the variables age, gender, CYP2C9 and VKORC1 SNP genotypes, was run to derive the best model for estimating the warfarin dose that achieves an INR of 2-3. The new warfarin dosing algorithm was examined in a second cohort of patients (n=34) to check its validity. The predicted dose requirements for a subgroup of our patients were calculated according to Gage and International Warfarin Pharmacogenetics Consortium (IWPC) algorithms available at http://www.warfarindosing.org.

Results: In the study cohort, warfarin dose/week in VKORC1 TT subjects was statistically significantly lower than in VKORC1 CC/CT subjects (p=0.032), while there was no statistically significant difference in warfarin dose/week between CYP2C9*1*1 and *1*3 (p=0.925). A multivariate stepwise linear regression analysis revealed that age and VKORC1 had independent and significant contributions to the overall variability in warfarin dose with a p-value=0.013 and 0.042, respectively. Maintenance dose (mg/week)=65.226-0.422×(age) - 9.474×(VKORC1). The estimated regression equation was able to account for 20.5% of the overall variability in warfarin maintenance dose. A significant positive correlation, with sufficient strength, was observed between the predicted warfarin dose and the actual prescribed dose (r=0.453, p=0.001). In the validation cohort, after application of the dosing algorithm, correlation between predicted and actual dose was statistically significant (p=0.023). The equation was particularly successful among patients with a dose≥35 mg/week. The correlation coefficient between the actual and predicted doses for IWPC and Gage were 0.304 and 0.276, respectively. When compared with our algorithm (r=0.279), the difference was non-significant: p=0.903 and 0.990, respectively.

Conclusion: VKORC1 (1173C>T) contributes to the warfarin dose variability. Patients' age and genetic variants of VKORC1 account for nearly 20.5% of the variability in warfarin dose required to achieve an INR of 2-3. The success of a prediction equation based on these variables was proved in a different cohort: the predicted dose correlated significantly with the maintenance dose and the equation was more successful among patients with a dose≥35 mg/week. The results of the warfarin algorithm we developed were comparable with those of the IWPC and Gage algorithms with the advantage of using one SNP (VKORC1 1173C>T) only. This represents an economic advantage in our community. Replication of this study in a larger cohort of patients is necessary before translation of this knowledge into clinical guidelines for warfarin prescription.

Citing Articles

Probable Interaction Between Warfarin and Divalproex Sodium.

Anderson S, Marrs J J Pharm Technol. 2021; 30(1):8-12.

PMID: 34860893 PMC: 5990136. DOI: 10.1177/8755122513514379.


Prospective validation of the International Warfarin Pharmacogenetics Consortium algorithm in high-risk elderly people (VIALE study).

Filippelli A, Signoriello S, Bancone C, Corbi G, Manzo V, Iesu S Pharmacogenomics J. 2019; 20(3):451-461.

PMID: 31801992 DOI: 10.1038/s41397-019-0129-6.


Non-genetic factors and polymorphisms in genes CYP2C9 and VKORC1: predictive algorithms for TTR in Brazilian patients on warfarin.

Praxedes M, Martins M, Mourao A, Gomes K, Reis E, Souza R Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2019; 76(2):199-209.

PMID: 31720756 DOI: 10.1007/s00228-019-02772-4.


Evaluation of - and -based pharmacogenetic algorithm for warfarin dose in Gaza-Palestine.

Ayesh B, Abu Shaaban A, Abed A Future Sci OA. 2018; 4(3):FSO276.

PMID: 29568565 PMC: 5859345. DOI: 10.4155/fsoa-2017-0112.


Impact of Genetic Polymorphisms on Phenytoin Pharmacokinetics and Clinical Outcomes in the Middle East and North Africa Region.

Dagenais R, Wilby K, Elewa H, Ensom M Drugs R D. 2017; 17(3):341-361.

PMID: 28748348 PMC: 5629135. DOI: 10.1007/s40268-017-0195-7.


References
1.
Gage B, Eby C, E Milligan P, Banet G, Duncan J, McLeod H . Use of pharmacogenetics and clinical factors to predict the maintenance dose of warfarin. Thromb Haemost. 2003; 91(1):87-94. DOI: 10.1160/TH03-06-0379. View

2.
DAndrea G, DAmbrosio R, Margaglione M . Oral anticoagulants: Pharmacogenetics Relationship between genetic and non-genetic factors. Blood Rev. 2008; 22(3):127-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.blre.2007.11.004. View

3.
You J, Wong R, Waye M, Mu Y, Lim C, Choi K . Warfarin dosing algorithm using clinical, demographic and pharmacogenetic data from Chinese patients. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2010; 31(1):113-8. DOI: 10.1007/s11239-010-0497-x. View

4.
Wadelius M, Chen L, Downes K, Ghori J, Hunt S, Eriksson N . Common VKORC1 and GGCX polymorphisms associated with warfarin dose. Pharmacogenomics J. 2005; 5(4):262-70. DOI: 10.1038/sj.tpj.6500313. View

5.
Bazan N, Sabry N, Rizk A, Mokhtar S, Badary O . Validation of pharmacogenetic algorithms and warfarin dosing table in Egyptian patients. Int J Clin Pharm. 2012; 34(6):837-44. DOI: 10.1007/s11096-012-9678-3. View