» Articles » PMID: 23835709

Reducing Treatment Decision Conflict Difficulties in Breast Cancer Surgery: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview
Journal J Clin Oncol
Specialty Oncology
Date 2013 Jul 10
PMID 23835709
Citations 42
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Breast cancer (BC) decision aid (DA) randomized studies are limited to DA use in consultations among Western populations and for primary surgery. Their effectiveness beyond consultations, for reconstructive surgery and in other populations, has not been evaluated. We developed a DA administered after consultation for Chinese women deciding on BC surgery and, where relevant, immediate breast reconstruction, which was evaluated in this randomized controlled trial (RCT).

Patients And Methods: Overall, 276 women considering BC surgery for early-stage BC were randomly assigned to receive a DA (take-home booklet) or the standard information booklet (control condition) after the initial consultation, wherein surgeons disclosed the diagnosis and discussed treatment options with patients. Using block random assignment by week, 138 women were assigned to the DA arm and 138 to the control arm. Participants completed interview-based questionnaires 1 week after consultation and then 1, 4, and 10 months after surgery. Primary outcome measures were decisional conflict, decision-making difficulties, BC knowledge 1 week after consultation, and decision regret 1 month after surgery. Secondary outcome measures were treatment decision, decision regret 4 and 10 months after surgery, and postsurgical anxiety and depression.

Results: The DA group reported significantly lower decisional conflict scores 1 week after consultation (P = .016) compared with women in the control arm. Women receiving the DA had significantly lower decision regret scores 4 (P = .026) and 10 months (P = .014) after surgery and lower depression scores 10 months after surgery (P = .001).

Conclusion: This RCT demonstrated DAs may benefit Chinese patients in Hong Kong by reducing decisional conflict and subsequent regret and enhance clinical services for this population.

Citing Articles

Effect of shared decision-making in patients with breast cancer undergoing breast reconstruction surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Chen L, Lu J, Chen B, Zhang X Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2024; 11(11):100596.

PMID: 39582550 PMC: 11582372. DOI: 10.1016/j.apjon.2024.100596.


Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.

Stacey D, Lewis K, Smith M, Carley M, Volk R, Douglas E Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024; 1:CD001431.

PMID: 38284415 PMC: 10823577. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub6.


A formalized shared decision-making process with individualized decision aids for older patients referred for cardiac surgery.

Gainer R, Buth K, Begum J, Hirsch G Can J Surg. 2024; 67(1):E7-E15.

PMID: 38171589 PMC: 10790712. DOI: 10.1503/cjs.004922.


Effect of patient decision aids on decisional conflict and regret associated with breast cancer surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

Lin S, Su C, Wu H, Chou Y, Yen Y, Tam K Breast Cancer. 2022; 29(5):880-888.

PMID: 35589905 DOI: 10.1007/s12282-022-01370-0.


Patient opinions on contralateral prophylactic mastectomy: A patient-driven discussion in need of tuning?.

Brown Z, Schellenberg A, Cordeiro E, Holloway C, Scheer A, Eisen A Can J Surg. 2022; 65(2):E250-E256.

PMID: 35365498 PMC: 8979655. DOI: 10.1503/cjs.003420.