» Articles » PMID: 23822606

Comparison of Capecitabine and 5-fluorouracil in Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

Overview
Journal Radiat Oncol
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialties Oncology
Radiology
Date 2013 Jul 5
PMID 23822606
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Although capecitabine has theoretical advantages in the pharmacokinetics, such as higher intratumoral and lower systemic concentration, relative to bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), outcomes of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with capecitabine or bolus 5-FU have not been directly compared in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Therefore, we retrospectively compared the outcomes, including toxicity, tumor response, and overall survival, of oral capecitabine plus radiotherapy (RT) with bolus 5-FU plus RT, in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

Methods: Between August 2006 and January 2012, 98 patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer received CRT, with 52 receiving concurrent oral capecitabine and 46 receiving bolus injection of 5-FU. Primary tumor and overall response after CRT were evaluated radiologically, and toxicity, tumor response, and overall survival (OS) were compared in the two groups.

Results: Baseline clinical parameters of the two groups were similar. The rates of ≥ Grade 3 hematologic (0% vs. 8.7%, p = 0.045) and non-hematologic (0% vs. 8.7%, p = 0.045) toxicities were significantly lower in the capecitabine group than in the 5-FU group. Primary tumor (30.7% vs. 28.2%, p = 0.658) and overall (13.7% vs. 15.2%, p = 0.273) response rates and median OS time (12.5 months vs. 11.6 months, p = 0.655) were similar in the two groups.

Conclusions: Capecitabine plus RT may be a safe and feasible regimen for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer, with similar efficacy and low rates of toxicities compared with bolus 5-FU plus RT.

Citing Articles

Prospects and feasibility of synergistic therapy with radiotherapy, immunotherapy, and DNA methyltransferase inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer.

Jie C, Li R, Cheng Y, Wang Z, Wu Q, Xie C Front Immunol. 2023; 14:1122352.

PMID: 36875059 PMC: 9981667. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1122352.


A phantom-based analysis for tracking intra-fraction pancreatic tumor motion by ultrasound imaging during radiation therapy.

Ji T, Feng Z, Sun E, Ng S, Su L, Zhang Y Front Oncol. 2022; 12:996537.

PMID: 36237341 PMC: 9552199. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.996537.


The pivotal role of DNA methylation in the radio-sensitivity of tumor radiotherapy.

Zhu X, Wang Y, Tan L, Fu X Cancer Med. 2018; 7(8):3812-3819.

PMID: 29952116 PMC: 6089158. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.1614.


Adjuvant, neoadjuvant, and experimental regimens in overcoming pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Wysocka O, Kulbacka J, Saczko J Prz Gastroenterol. 2016; 11(3):155-162.

PMID: 27713776 PMC: 5047971. DOI: 10.5114/pg.2016.61438.


Phase I trial of vorinostat added to chemoradiation with capecitabine in pancreatic cancer.

Chan E, Arlinghaus L, Cardin D, Goff L, Berlin J, Parikh A Radiother Oncol. 2016; 119(2):312-8.

PMID: 27106554 PMC: 4961249. DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.04.013.


References
1.
Hofheinz R, Wenz F, Post S, Matzdorff A, Laechelt S, Hartmann J . Chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine versus fluorouracil for locally advanced rectal cancer: a randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012; 13(6):579-88. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70116-X. View

2.
Huguet F, Girard N, Guerche C, Hennequin C, Mornex F, Azria D . Chemoradiotherapy in the management of locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma: a qualitative systematic review. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27(13):2269-77. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.7921. View

3.
Schuller J, Cassidy J, Dumont E, Roos B, Durston S, Banken L . Preferential activation of capecitabine in tumor following oral administration to colorectal cancer patients. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2001; 45(4):291-7. DOI: 10.1007/s002800050043. View

4.
Crane C, Abbruzzese J, Evans D, Wolff R, Ballo M, Delclos M . Is the therapeutic index better with gemcitabine-based chemoradiation than with 5-fluorouracil-based chemoradiation in locally advanced pancreatic cancer?. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002; 52(5):1293-302. DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(01)02740-7. View

5.
Kim T, Han S, Park S, Lee W, Woo S, Yoo T . CA 19-9 level as indicator of early distant metastasis and therapeutic selection in resected pancreatic cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010; 81(5):e743-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.10.011. View