Clinical Outcomes Assessment in Clinical Trials to Assess Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement: Use of Patient-reported Outcome Measures

Overview

Journal J Am Acad Orthop Surg

Publisher Wolters Kluwer

Specialties General Surgery
Orthopedics

Date 2013 Jul 3

PMID 23818190

Citations 20

Authors

Marcie Harris-Hayes

Christine M McDonough

Michael Leunig

Cara Beth Lee

John J Callaghan

Ewa M Roos

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Patient-reported outcome measures are an important component of outcomes assessment in clinical trials to assess the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). This review of disease-specific measures and instruments used to assess the generic quality of life and physical activity levels of patients with FAI found no conclusive evidence to support a single disease-specific questionnaire. Using a systematic review of study methodology, the Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score and the 33-item International Hip Outcome Tool scored the best. Nevertheless, both of these instruments were developed recently and have not been established in the literature. Although currently used generic and activity-level measures have limitations, as well, they should be considered, depending on the specific goals of the study. Additional research is needed to assess the properties of these measures fully when used to evaluate patients with FAI.

Citing Articles

Efficacy and safety of arthroscopy in femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Lamo-Espinosa J, Mariscal G, Gomez-Alvarez J, San-Julian M Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):7775.

PMID: 40044717 PMC: 11882802. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-91788-1.

Comparison of Pain Scores and Functional Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Hip Labral Repair and Concomitant Capsular Repair or Plication Versus No Closure.

Bindi V, Hao K, Freeman D, Olowofela B, Moser M, Farmer K Orthop J Sports Med. 2024; 12(4):23259671241243303.

PMID: 38646603 PMC: 11032060. DOI: 10.1177/23259671241243303.

Efficacy and safety of arthroscopy in femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Lamo-Espinosa J, Mariscal G, Gomez-Alvarez J, San-Julian M Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):16493.

PMID: 37779117 PMC: 10543634. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-43441-y.

Arthroscopic hip surgery compared with personalised hip therapy in people over 16 years old with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: UK FASHIoN RCT.

Griffin D, Dickenson E, Achana F, Griffin J, Smith J, Wall P Health Technol Assess. 2022; 26(16):1-236.

PMID: 35229713 PMC: 8919110. DOI: 10.3310/FXII0508.

Individuals With Pre-arthritic Hip Pain Walk With Hip Motion Alterations Common in Individuals With Hip OA.

Lewis C, Halverstadt A, Graber K, Perkins Z, Keiser E, Belcher H Front Sports Act Living. 2021; 3():719097.

PMID: 34505057 PMC: 8421535. DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2021.719097.

References

Terwee C, Bouwmeester W, van Elsland S, de Vet H, Dekker J . Instruments to assess physical activity in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: a systematic review of measurement properties. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2011; 19(6):620-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2011.01.002. View

Lodhia P, Slobogean G, Noonan V, Gilbart M . Patient-reported outcome instruments for femoroacetabular impingement and hip labral pathology: a systematic review of the clinimetric evidence. Arthroscopy. 2010; 27(2):279-86. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2010.08.002. View

Keener J, Callaghan J, Goetz D, Pederson D, Sullivan P, Johnston R . Long-term function after Charnley total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003; (417):148-56. DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000096807.78689.19. View

Mokkink L, Terwee C, Patrick D, Alonso J, Stratford P, Knol D . The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2010; 19(4):539-49. PMC: 2852520. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-010-9606-8. View

Fries J, Krishnan E, Rose M, Lingala B, Bruce B . Improved responsiveness and reduced sample size requirements of PROMIS physical function scales with item response theory. Arthritis Res Ther. 2011; 13(5):R147. PMC: 3308075. DOI: 10.1186/ar3461. View

Martin R, Kelly B, Philippon M . Evidence of validity for the hip outcome score. Arthroscopy. 2006; 22(12):1304-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2006.07.027. View

Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A, Murray D . Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996; 78(2):185-90. View

Harris-Hayes M, Steger-May K, Pashos G, Clohisy J, Prather H . Stride activity level in young and middle-aged adults with hip disorders. Physiother Theory Pract. 2011; 28(5):333-43. PMC: 3586766. DOI: 10.3109/09593985.2011.639852. View

Thorborg K, Roos E, Bartels E, Petersen J, Holmich P . Validity, reliability and responsiveness of patient-reported outcome questionnaires when assessing hip and groin disability: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2009; 44(16):1186-96. DOI: 10.1136/bjsm.2009.060889. View

10.

Amstutz H, Thomas B, Jinnah R, Kim W, Grogan T, Yale C . Treatment of primary osteoarthritis of the hip. A comparison of total joint and surface replacement arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984; 66(2):228-41. View

11.

Mokkink L, Terwee C, Knol D, Stratford P, Alonso J, Patrick D . The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: a clarification of its content. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010; 10:22. PMC: 2848183. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-22. View

12.

Enright P, McBurnie M, Bittner V, Tracy R, McNamara R, Arnold A . The 6-min walk test: a quick measure of functional status in elderly adults. Chest. 2003; 123(2):387-98. DOI: 10.1378/chest.123.2.387. View

13.

Magasi S, Ryan G, Revicki D, Lenderking W, Hays R, Brod M . Content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: perspectives from a PROMIS meeting. Qual Life Res. 2011; 21(5):739-46. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-011-9990-8. View

14.

Haley S, Ni P, Jette A, Tao W, Moed R, Meyers D . Replenishing a computerized adaptive test of patient-reported daily activity functioning. Qual Life Res. 2009; 18(4):461-71. PMC: 3339485. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-009-9463-5. View

15.

Tegner Y, Lysholm J . Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985; (198):43-9. View

16.

Baecke J, BUREMA J, Frijters J . A short questionnaire for the measurement of habitual physical activity in epidemiological studies. Am J Clin Nutr. 1982; 36(5):936-42. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/36.5.936. View

17.

Mokkink L, Terwee C, Gibbons E, Stratford P, Alonso J, Patrick D . Inter-rater agreement and reliability of the COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement Instruments) checklist. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010; 10:82. PMC: 2957386. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-82. View

18.

Marx R, Stump T, Jones E, Wickiewicz T, Warren R . Development and evaluation of an activity rating scale for disorders of the knee. Am J Sports Med. 2001; 29(2):213-8. DOI: 10.1177/03635465010290021601. View

19.

Christensen C, Althausen P, Mittleman M, Lee J, McCarthy J . The nonarthritic hip score: reliable and validated. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003; (406):75-83. DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000043047.84315.4b. View

20.

Rose M, Bjorner J, Becker J, Fries J, Ware J . Evaluation of a preliminary physical function item bank supported the expected advantages of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). J Clin Epidemiol. 2007; 61(1):17-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.06.025. View