» Articles » PMID: 23814733

The Perforation-Operation Time Interval; An Important Mortality Indicator in Peptic Ulcer Perforation

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2013 Jul 2
PMID 23814733
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To find out the significance of the Perforation-Operation Interval (POI) with respect to an early prognosis, in patients with peritonitis which is caused by peptic ulcer perforation.

Study Design: Case series. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of General Surgery, Konaseema Institute of Medical Sciences and RF Amalapuram, Andhra Pradesh, India from 2008-2011.

Materials And Method: This study included 150 patients with generalized peritonitis, who were diagnosed to have Perforated Peptic Ulcers (PPUs). The diagnosis of the PPUs was established on the basis of the history , the clinical examination and the radiological findings. The perforation-operation interval was calculated from the time of onset of the symptoms like severe abdominal pain or vomiting till the time the patient was operated.

Result: Out of the 150 patients 134 were males and 16 were females, with a male : female ratio of 9:1. Their ages ranged between 25-70 years. Out of the 150 patients, 65 patients (43.3%) presented within 24 hours of the onset of severe abdominal pain (Group A), 27 patients (18%) presented between 24-48 hours of the onset of severe abdominal pain (Group B) and 58 patients (38.6%) presented after 48 hours. There was no mortality in Group A and the morbidity was more in Group B and Group C. There were 15 deaths in Group C.

Conclusion: The problem of peptic ulcer perforation with its complication, can be decreased by decreasing the perforation -operation time interval, which as per our study, appeared to be the single most important mortality and morbidity indicator in peptic ulcer perforation.

Citing Articles

Time-to-surgery paradigms: wait time and surgical outcomes in critically Ill patients who underwent emergency surgery for gastrointestinal perforation.

Lee J, Im C BMC Surg. 2024; 24(1):159.

PMID: 38760752 PMC: 11100233. DOI: 10.1186/s12893-024-02452-w.


Operative versus non-operative management for perforated peptic ulcer disease.

Gupta S, Alawad A, Dacosta K, Mahmoud A, Mohammed T Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022; 82:104643.

PMID: 36268326 PMC: 9577597. DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104643.


Role of Radiology and Laparoscopy in Childhood Peptic Ulcer Perforation.

Demir M, Akin M, Yucel N, Unal A, Gurel D, Yasa E J Environ Public Health. 2022; 2022:1211499.

PMID: 35910757 PMC: 9328947. DOI: 10.1155/2022/1211499.


Surgery for Perforated Peptic Ulcer: Is Laparoscopy a New Paradigm?.

Pereira A, Sousa H, Goncalves D, da Costa E, Pinho A, Barbosa E Minim Invasive Surg. 2021; 2021:8828091.

PMID: 34055409 PMC: 8133844. DOI: 10.1155/2021/8828091.


Surgical Management of Peptic Perforation in a Tertiary Care Center: A Retrospective Study.

Sengupta T, Prakash G, Ray S, Kar M Niger Med J. 2021; 61(6):328-333.

PMID: 33888930 PMC: 8040944. DOI: 10.4103/nmj.NMJ_191_20.


References
1.
Bas G, Eryilmaz R, Okan I, Sahin M . Risk factors of morbidity and mortality in patients with perforated peptic ulcer. Acta Chir Belg. 2008; 108(4):424-7. DOI: 10.1080/00015458.2008.11680254. View

2.
Boey J, Choi S, Poon A, Alagaratnam T . Risk stratification in perforated duodenal ulcers. A prospective validation of predictive factors. Ann Surg. 1987; 205(1):22-6. PMC: 1492892. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-198701000-00005. View

3.
Lau W, Leow C . History of perforated duodenal and gastric ulcers. World J Surg. 1997; 21(8):890-6. DOI: 10.1007/s002689900323. View

4.
Boey J, Wong J, Ong G . A prospective study of operative risk factors in perforated duodenal ulcers. Ann Surg. 1982; 195(3):265-9. PMC: 1352629. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-198203000-00004. View

5.
Druart M, Van Hee R, Etienne J, Cadiere G, Gigot J, Legrand M . Laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcer. A prospective multicenter clinical trial. Surg Endosc. 1997; 11(10):1017-20. DOI: 10.1007/s004649900515. View