» Articles » PMID: 23809700

Genetic and Developmental Analysis of Differences in Eye and Face Morphology Between Drosophila Simulans and Drosophila Mauritiana

Overview
Journal Evol Dev
Specialty Biology
Date 2013 Jul 2
PMID 23809700
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Eye and head morphology vary considerably among insects and even between closely related species of Drosophila. Species of the D. melanogaster subgroup, and other Drosophila species, exhibit a negative correlation between eye size and face width (FW); for example, D. mauritiana generally has bigger eyes composed of larger ommatidia and conversely a narrower face than its sibling species. To better understand the evolution of eye and head morphology, we investigated the genetic and developmental basis of differences in eye size and FW between male D. mauritiana and D. simulans. QTL mapping of eye size and FW showed that the major loci responsible for the interspecific variation in these traits are localized to different genomic regions. Introgression of the largest effect QTL underlying the difference in eye size resulted in flies with larger eyes but no significant difference in FW. Moreover,introgression of a QTL region on the third chromosome that contributes to the FW difference between these species affected FW, but not eye size. We also observed that this difference in FW is detectable earlier in the development of the eye‐antennal disc than the difference in the size of the retinal field. Our results suggest that different loci that act at different developmental stages underlie changes in eye size and FW. Therefore, while there is a negative correlation between these traits in Drosophila, we show genetically that they also have the potential to evolve independently and this may help to explain the evolution of these traits in other insects.

Citing Articles

Heterochrony in orthodenticle expression is associated with ommatidial size variation between Drosophila species.

Torres-Oliva M, Buchberger E, Buffry A, Kittelmann M, Guerrero G, Sumner-Rooney L BMC Biol. 2025; 23(1):34.

PMID: 39901145 PMC: 11792340. DOI: 10.1186/s12915-025-02136-8.


Evolution of compound eye morphology underlies differences in vision between closely related Drosophila species.

Buffry A, Currea J, Franke-Gerth F, Palavalli-Nettimi R, Bodey A, Rau C BMC Biol. 2024; 22(1):67.

PMID: 38504308 PMC: 10953123. DOI: 10.1186/s12915-024-01864-7.


Tissue dissociation for single-cell and single-nuclei RNA sequencing for low amounts of input material.

Wiegleb G, Reinhardt S, Dahl A, Posnien N Front Zool. 2022; 19(1):27.

PMID: 36371195 PMC: 9652833. DOI: 10.1186/s12983-022-00472-x.


Genetic, morphometric, and molecular analyses of interspecies differences in head shape and hybrid developmental defects in the wasp genus Nasonia.

Cohen L, Jewell R, Moody D, Arsala D, Werren J, Lynch J G3 (Bethesda). 2021; 11(12).

PMID: 34580730 PMC: 8664464. DOI: 10.1093/g3journal/jkab313.


Interplay between sex determination cascade and major signaling pathways during Drosophila eye development: Perspectives for future research.

Surkova S, Gorne J, Nuzhdin S, Samsonova M Dev Biol. 2021; 476:41-52.

PMID: 33745943 PMC: 8172476. DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2021.03.005.


References
1.
Bell M, Travis M . Hybridization, transgressive segregation, genetic covariation, and adaptive radiation. Trends Ecol Evol. 2006; 20(7):358-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2005.04.021. View

2.
Emlen D, Nijhout H . The development and evolution of exaggerated morphologies in insects. Annu Rev Entomol. 2000; 45:661-708. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ento.45.1.661. View

3.
Steiger D, Furrer M, Schwinkendorf D, Gallant P . Max-independent functions of Myc in Drosophila melanogaster. Nat Genet. 2009; 40(9):1084-91. DOI: 10.1038/ng.178. View

4.
Norry F, Vilardi J, Hasson E . Negative genetic correlation between traits of the Drosophila head, and interspecific divergence in head shape. Heredity (Edinb). 2000; 85 ( Pt 2):177-83. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2540.2000.00735.x. View

5.
Land M . Visual acuity in insects. Annu Rev Entomol. 1997; 42:147-77. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ento.42.1.147. View