» Articles » PMID: 23809410

HIV Risk in Group Sexual Encounters: an Event-level Analysis from a National Online Survey of MSM in the U.S

Overview
Journal J Sex Med
Date 2013 Jul 2
PMID 23809410
Citations 30
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Researchers have investigated group sexual encounters (GSEs) as potential sources for HIV/STI transmission among men who have sex with men (MSM); however, much of this work has focused on organized sex parties.

Aim: To compare behavioral and social characteristics of groups of men who engaged in three types of GSEs: threesomes, spontaneous group sex, and organized sex parties.

Methods: In 2012, 1,815 U.S.-based MSM completed an online survey.

Main Outcome Measure: We compared men based on their most recent type of GSE: threesome (68.2%), spontaneous group sex (19.7%), or organized sex party (12.1%).

Results: Using multinomial logistic regression, with type of GSE as the dependent variable, MSM who were HIV-positive, used stimulants (cocaine, methamphetamine, crack), consumed five or more alcoholic drinks, and reported receptive unprotected anal intercourse (UAI) during the most recent GSE had significantly higher odds of having had spontaneous group sex as compared to a threesome. MSM who were HIV-positive, not in a relationship, and did not report receptive UAI during the most recent GSE had significantly higher odds of having attended an organized sex party as compared to a threesome. MSM who were in a relationship, had consumed five or more alcoholic drinks, had used stimulants, and reported receptive UAI during the most recent GSE had significantly higher odds of having had spontaneous group sex as compared to an organized sex party. Compared to others, those having engaged in a GSE were more likely to report recent UAI (65% vs. 45%).

Conclusions: Men having engaged in a GSE were at greater risk for behaviors that transmit HIV and STIs. Unique social and behavioral characteristics inherent to threesomes, spontaneous group sex, and sex parties highlight the need to identify prevention strategies to help those who participate in GSEs reduce their risk for HIV and STI transmission.

Citing Articles

Unveiling the dynamics of HIV transmission among young homosexual and bisexual men in Korea.

Jung M BMC Public Health. 2025; 25(1):678.

PMID: 39966839 PMC: 11837428. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-025-21751-2.


Syndemic conditions associated with hazardous alcohol consumption among sexual minority men in San Francisco.

Ngo T, Cuffaro T, Santos G Drug Alcohol Depend Rep. 2024; 13:100297.

PMID: 39619334 PMC: 11605325. DOI: 10.1016/j.dadr.2024.100297.


Structural Influences on Methamphetamine Use Among Black Sexual Minority Men (HISTORY Study): Protocol for a Longitudinal Cohort Study.

Opara S, Linton S, Weir B, Crawford N, Holland D, Newman Jr A JMIR Res Protoc. 2024; 13:e63761.

PMID: 39481101 PMC: 11565090. DOI: 10.2196/63761.


The Best Predictor of Future Behavior May Be the Past: Exploring Behavior Change in Men Who Have Sex with Men Using Pre-exposure Prophylaxis in the Netherlands.

van Wees D, Coyer L, van den Elshout M, de Coul E, van Aar F Arch Sex Behav. 2024; 53(7):2777-2793.

PMID: 38709341 PMC: 11219441. DOI: 10.1007/s10508-024-02863-z.


Correlates of group sex participation among men who have sex with men in Chongqing, Southwestern China.

Chen J, Fan H, Chen H, Yao F BMC Public Health. 2021; 21(1):561.

PMID: 33752635 PMC: 7983368. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-10607-0.


References
1.
Grant R, Lama J, Anderson P, McMahan V, Liu A, Vargas L . Preexposure chemoprophylaxis for HIV prevention in men who have sex with men. N Engl J Med. 2010; 363(27):2587-99. PMC: 3079639. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1011205. View

2.
Grov C, Golub S, Parsons J . HIV status differences in venues where highly sexually active gay and bisexual men meet sex partners: results from a pilot study. AIDS Educ Prev. 2011; 22(6):496-508. PMC: 5824629. DOI: 10.1521/aeap.2010.22.6.496. View

3.
Grov C, Starks T, Rendina H, Parsons J . Rules about casual sex partners, relationship satisfaction, and HIV risk in partnered gay and bisexual men. J Sex Marital Ther. 2013; 40(2):105-22. DOI: 10.1080/0092623X.2012.691948. View

4.
Grov C, Parsons J, Bimbi D . Sexual risk behavior and venues for meeting sex partners: an intercept survey of gay and bisexual men in LA and NYC. AIDS Behav. 2007; 11(6):915-26. DOI: 10.1007/s10461-006-9199-y. View

5.
Pollock J, Halkitis P . Environmental factors in relation to unprotected sexual behavior among gay, bisexual, and other MSM. AIDS Educ Prev. 2009; 21(4):340-55. DOI: 10.1521/aeap.2009.21.4.340. View