» Articles » PMID: 23808860

Health Care Providers' Perspectives on Low HPV Vaccine Uptake and Adherence in Appalachian Kentucky

Overview
Date 2013 Jul 2
PMID 23808860
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Previous intervention research conducted in Appalachian Kentucky resulted in extremely low uptake and adherence to the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine among women ages 18-26, despite provision of free vaccine. Because of these findings, the purpose of this qualitative, follow-up study was to elicit health care providers' perspectives on barriers and facilitators to HPV vaccination and suggested strategies for improving vaccination rates.

Design And Sample: Researchers conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with a purposive sample of eight health care providers (seven nursing professionals, one physician) at the health clinic where the original HPV vaccination intervention took place. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed and authors used a constant-comparative method to analyze the data.

Results: Significant themes emerged from the interviews, centering around two primary issues: vaccine uptake and vaccine adherence. Related to uptake, health care providers identified perceived patient barriers and inadequate HPV vaccine education. They also identified the vaccine schedule and clinic-centered communication deficiencies as adherence-related barriers.

Conclusion: These Appalachian Kentucky health care providers provided important insights into barriers and facilitators to HPV vaccine uptake and adherence that need to be readily addressed in this community. As informed by these providers, several suggestions for improving HPV vaccination, such as more targeted education efforts and patient-centered reminder systems, may be applicable to other nursing professionals working in rural and medically underserved communities.

Citing Articles

The Future of Cervical Cancer Screening.

Goldstein A, Gersh M, Skovronsky G, Moss C Int J Womens Health. 2024; 16:1715-1731.

PMID: 39464249 PMC: 11512781. DOI: 10.2147/IJWH.S474571.


Facilitators and barriers of HPV vaccination: a qualitative study in rural Georgia.

Petagna C, Perez S, Hsu E, Greene B, Banner I, Bednarczyk R BMC Cancer. 2024; 24(1):592.

PMID: 38750439 PMC: 11094994. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12351-1.


#4Corners4Health Social Media Cancer Prevention Campaign for Emerging Adults: Protocol for a Randomized Stepped-Wedge Trial.

Buller D, Sussman A, Thomson C, Kepka D, Taren D, Henry K JMIR Res Protoc. 2024; 13:e50392.

PMID: 38386396 PMC: 10921336. DOI: 10.2196/50392.


Acceptability of HPV Vaccines: A Qualitative Systematic Review and Meta-Summary.

Urrutia M, Araya A, Gajardo M, Chepo M, Torres R, Schilling A Vaccines (Basel). 2023; 11(9).

PMID: 37766161 PMC: 10536942. DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11091486.


Nurses' perceptions, experiences, and practices regarding human papillomavirus vaccination: results from a cross-sectional survey in Montana.

Thaker J, Albers A, Newcomer S BMC Nurs. 2023; 22(1):211.

PMID: 37337180 PMC: 10278302. DOI: 10.1186/s12912-023-01379-6.


References
1.
Brewer N, Chapman G, Gibbons F, Gerrard M, McCaul K, Weinstein N . Meta-analysis of the relationship between risk perception and health behavior: the example of vaccination. Health Psychol. 2007; 26(2):136-45. DOI: 10.1037/0278-6133.26.2.136. View

2.
. Cancer death rates--Appalachia, 1994-1998. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2002; 51(24):527-9. View

3.
Hopenhayn C, King J, Christian A, Huang B, Christian W . Variability of cervical cancer rates across 5 Appalachian states, 1998-2003. Cancer. 2008; 113(10 Suppl):2974-80. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.23749. View

4.
Duval B, Gilca V, Boulianne N, Pielak K, Halperin B, Simpson M . Cervical cancer prevention by vaccination: nurses' knowledge, attitudes and intentions. J Adv Nurs. 2009; 65(3):499-508. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04900.x. View

5.
Rosenthal S, Weiss T, Zimet G, Ma L, Good M, Vichnin M . Predictors of HPV vaccine uptake among women aged 19-26: importance of a physician's recommendation. Vaccine. 2010; 29(5):890-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.12.063. View