» Articles » PMID: 23804970

Statistical Methods for Multivariate Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Tests: An Overview and Tutorial

Overview
Publisher Sage Publications
Specialties Public Health
Science
Date 2013 Jun 28
PMID 23804970
Citations 32
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In this article, we present an overview and tutorial of statistical methods for meta-analysis of diagnostic tests under two scenarios: (1) when the reference test can be considered a gold standard and (2) when the reference test cannot be considered a gold standard. In the first scenario, we first review the conventional summary receiver operating characteristics approach and a bivariate approach using linear mixed models. Both approaches require direct calculations of study-specific sensitivities and specificities. We next discuss the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristics curve approach for jointly modeling positivity criteria and accuracy parameters, and the bivariate generalized linear mixed models for jointly modeling sensitivities and specificities. We further discuss the trivariate generalized linear mixed models for jointly modeling prevalence, sensitivities and specificities, which allows us to assess the correlations among the three parameters. These approaches are based on the exact binomial distribution and thus do not require an ad hoc continuity correction. Lastly, we discuss a latent class random effects model for meta-analysis of diagnostic tests when the reference test itself is imperfect for the second scenario. A number of case studies with detailed annotated SAS code in MIXED and NLMIXED procedures are presented to facilitate the implementation of these approaches.

Citing Articles

Choice of Link Functions for Generalized Linear Mixed Models in Meta-Analyses of Proportions.

Siegel L, Silva M, Lin L, Chen Y, Liu Y, Chu H Res Methods Med Health Sci. 2024; 6(1):13-23.

PMID: 39668973 PMC: 11632795. DOI: 10.1177/26320843231224808.


Effect of different exercise regimens on LVEF and restenosis incidence in patients after PCI: a network meta-analysis and an overview of systematic reviews.

Li H, Lu L, Han Z, Liu Z, Pan J, Wang Y Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023; 10:1241343.

PMID: 38034391 PMC: 10686069. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1241343.


Double-Negative Results Matter: A Reevaluation of Sensitivities for Detecting SARS-CoV-2 Infection Using Saliva Versus Nasopharyngeal Swabs.

Wang Z, Liu Y, Chen Y, Siegel L, Cappelleri J, Chu H Am J Epidemiol. 2023; 193(3):548-560.

PMID: 37939113 PMC: 11484624. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwad212.


The association of sensitivity and specificity with disease prevalence: analysis of 6909 studies of diagnostic test accuracy.

Murad M, Lin L, Chu H, Hasan B, Alsibai R, Abbas A CMAJ. 2023; 195(27):E925-E931.

PMID: 37460126 PMC: 10356012. DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.221802.


Application of FT-IR spectroscopy and chemometric technique for the identification of three different parts of and discrimination of its authenticated product.

Tew W, Ying C, Wujun Z, Baocai L, Yoon T, Yam M Front Pharmacol. 2022; 13:931203.

PMID: 36238551 PMC: 9551166. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.931203.


References
1.
Tosteson A, Begg C . A general regression methodology for ROC curve estimation. Med Decis Making. 1988; 8(3):204-15. DOI: 10.1177/0272989X8800800309. View

2.
Walter S, Irwig L, Glasziou P . Meta-analysis of diagnostic tests with imperfect reference standards. J Clin Epidemiol. 1999; 52(10):943-51. DOI: 10.1016/s0895-4356(99)00086-4. View

3.
Chu H, Guo H . A unification of models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies. Biostatistics. 2008; 10(1):201-3. PMC: 2733159. DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxn040. View

4.
Smith T, Back T, Toms A, Hing C . Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound for rotator cuff tears in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Radiol. 2011; 66(11):1036-48. DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2011.05.007. View

5.
Chu H, Chen S, Louis T . Random Effects Models in a Meta-Analysis of the Accuracy of Two Diagnostic Tests Without a Gold Standard. J Am Stat Assoc. 2009; 104(486):512-523. PMC: 2701906. DOI: 10.1198/jasa.2009.0017. View