» Articles » PMID: 23799022

Are Women Deciding Against Home Births in Low and Middle Income Countries?

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2013 Jun 27
PMID 23799022
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Although there is evidence to tracking progress towards facility births within the UN Millennium Development Goals framework, we do not know whether women are deciding against home birth over their reproductive lives. Using Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) data from 44 countries, this study aims to investigate the patterns and shifts in childbirth locations and to determine whether these shifts are in favour of home or health settings.

Methods And Findings: The analyses considered 108,777 women who had at least two births in the five years preceding the most recent DHS over the period 2000-2010. The vast majority of women opted for the same place of childbirth for their successive births. However, about 14% did switch their place and not all these decisions favoured health facility over home setting. In 24 of the 44 countries analysed, a higher proportion of women switched from a health facility to home. Multilevel regression analyses show significantly higher odds of switching from home to a facility for high parity women, those with frequent antenatal visits and more wealth. However, in countries with high infant mortality rates, low parity women had an increased probability of switching from home to a health facility.

Conclusions: There is clear evidence that women do change their childbirth locations over successive births in low and middle income countries. After two decades of efforts to improve maternal health, it might be expected that a higher proportion of women will be deciding against home births in favour of facility births. The results from this analysis show that is not the case.

Citing Articles

Predictors of health facility childbirth among unmarried and married youth in Uganda.

Agaba P, Magadi M, Orton B PLoS One. 2022; 17(4):e0266657.

PMID: 35390079 PMC: 8989320. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266657.


Birth cultures: A qualitative approach to home birthing in Chile.

Rodriguez-Garrido P, Goberna-Tricas J PLoS One. 2021; 16(4):e0249224.

PMID: 33886560 PMC: 8062023. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249224.


Inter-relationships among key reproductive health indicators in sub-Saharan Africa focusing on the central role of maternal literacy.

Woldegiorgis M, Meyer D, Hiller J, Mekonnen W, Bhowmik J Int Health. 2020; 14(4):421-433.

PMID: 32043526 PMC: 9248058. DOI: 10.1093/inthealth/ihz117.


Recognition and management of congenital ichthyosis in a low-income setting.

Saso A, Dowsing B, Forrest K, Glover M BMJ Case Rep. 2019; 12(8).

PMID: 31434665 PMC: 6706671. DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2018-228313.


Examining trends in inequality in the use of reproductive health care services in Ghana and Nigeria.

Ogundele O, Pavlova M, Groot W BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018; 18(1):492.

PMID: 30545328 PMC: 6293518. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-018-2102-9.


References
1.
Wall L . Dead mothers and injured wives: the social context of maternal morbidity and mortality among the Hausa of northern Nigeria. Stud Fam Plann. 1999; 29(4):341-59. View

2.
Montagu D, Yamey G, Visconti A, Harding A, Yoong J . Where do poor women in developing countries give birth? A multi-country analysis of demographic and health survey data. PLoS One. 2011; 6(2):e17155. PMC: 3046115. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017155. View

3.
Falkingham J . Inequality and changes in women's use of maternal health-care services in Tajikistan. Stud Fam Plann. 2003; 34(1):32-43. DOI: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2003.00032.x. View

4.
Costello A, Azad K, Barnett S . An alternative strategy to reduce maternal mortality. Lancet. 2006; 368(9546):1477-9. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69388-4. View

5.
Kesterton A, Cleland J, Sloggett A, Ronsmans C . Institutional delivery in rural India: the relative importance of accessibility and economic status. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010; 10:30. PMC: 2898676. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-10-30. View