A Comparison of South Asian Specific and Established BMI Thresholds for Determining Obesity Prevalence in Pregnancy and Predicting Pregnancy Complications: Findings from the Born in Bradford Cohort

Overview

Journal Int J Obes (Lond)

Specialty Endocrinology

Date 2013 Jun 26

PMID 23797188

Citations 14

Authors

M Bryant

G Santorelli

D A Lawlor

D Farrar

D Tuffnell

R Bhopal

J Wright

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective: To describe how maternal obesity prevalence varies by established international and South Asian specific body mass index (BMI) cut-offs in women of Pakistani origin and investigate whether different BMI thresholds can help to identify women at risk of adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes.

Design: Prospective bi-ethnic birth cohort study (the Born in Bradford (BiB) cohort).

Setting: Bradford, a deprived city in the North of the UK.

Participants: A total of 8478 South Asian and White British pregnant women participated in the BiB cohort study.

Main Outcome Measures: Maternal obesity prevalence; prevalence of known obesity-related adverse pregnancy outcomes: mode of birth, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), gestational diabetes, macrosomia and pre-term births.

Results: Application of South Asian BMI cut-offs increased prevalence of obesity in Pakistani women from 18.8 (95% confidence interval (CI) 17.6-19.9) to 30.9% (95% CI 29.5-32.2). With the exception of pre-term births, there was a positive linear relationship between BMI and prevalence of adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes, across almost the whole BMI distribution. Risk of gestational diabetes and HDP increased more sharply in Pakistani women after a BMI threshold of at least 30 kg m(-2), but there was no evidence of a sharp increase in any risk factors at the new, lower thresholds suggested for use in South Asian women. BMI was a good single predictor of outcomes (area under the receiver operating curve: 0.596-0.685 for different outcomes); prediction was more discriminatory and accurate with BMI as a continuous variable than as a binary variable for any possible cut-off point.

Conclusion: Applying the new South Asian threshold to pregnant women would markedly increase those who were referred for monitoring and lifestyle advice. However, our results suggest that lowering the BMI threshold in South Asian women would not improve the predictive ability for identifying those who were at risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Citing Articles

Non-linear associations of maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index with risk of stillbirth, infant, and neonatal mortality in over 28 million births in the USA: a retrospective cohort study.

Thornton H, Cornish R, Lawlor D EClinicalMedicine. 2023; 66:102351.

PMID: 38125933 PMC: 10730341. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102351.

Prevalence of Overweight and Obese Prepregnancy BMI and Excessive Gestational Weight Gain Using Asian-Specific Cutoffs Among Asian and Mixed-Asian Women Living in Hawaii: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Daida Y, Pedula K Matern Child Health J. 2022; 27(4):728-736.

PMID: 36214801 PMC: 10023603. DOI: 10.1007/s10995-022-03560-w.

Child mental health and resilience in the context of socioeconomic disadvantage: results from the Born in Bradford cohort study.

Kirby N, Wright B, Allgar V Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2019; 29(4):467-477.

PMID: 31243580 PMC: 7103573. DOI: 10.1007/s00787-019-01348-y.

Risk factors and potential protective factors of pregnancy-induced hypertension in China: A cross-sectional study.

Zhuang C, Gao J, Liu J, Wang X, He J, Sun J J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2019; 21(5):618-623.

PMID: 30990249 PMC: 8030480. DOI: 10.1111/jch.13541.

The burden of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Noubiap J, Bigna J, Nyaga U, M Jingi A, Kaze A, Nansseu J J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2019; 21(4):479-488.

PMID: 30848083 PMC: 8030504. DOI: 10.1111/jch.13514.

References

. Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. Lancet. 2004; 363(9403):157-63. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)15268-3. View

Gray L, Yates T, Davies M, Brady E, Webb D, Sattar N . Defining obesity cut-off points for migrant South Asians. PLoS One. 2011; 6(10):e26464. PMC: 3198431. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026464. View

Chiu M, Austin P, Manuel D, Shah B, Tu J . Deriving ethnic-specific BMI cutoff points for assessing diabetes risk. Diabetes Care. 2011; 34(8):1741-8. PMC: 3142051. DOI: 10.2337/dc10-2300. View

Vangen S, Stoltenberg C, Holan S, Moe N, Magnus P, Harris J . Outcome of pregnancy among immigrant women with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2003; 26(2):327-32. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.26.2.327. View

May M, Lawlor D, Brindle P, Patel R, Ebrahim S . Cardiovascular disease risk assessment in older women: can we improve on Framingham? British Women's Heart and Health prospective cohort study. Heart. 2006; 92(10):1396-401. PMC: 1861043. DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2005.085381. View

Lawlor D, Relton C, Sattar N, Nelson S . Maternal adiposity--a determinant of perinatal and offspring outcomes?. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2012; 8(11):679-88. DOI: 10.1038/nrendo.2012.176. View

Stevens J . Ethnic-specific revisions of body mass index cutoffs to define overweight and obesity in Asians are not warranted. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2003; 27(11):1297-9. DOI: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802417. View

Misra A, Chowbey P, Makkar B, Vikram N, Wasir J, Chadha D . Consensus statement for diagnosis of obesity, abdominal obesity and the metabolic syndrome for Asian Indians and recommendations for physical activity, medical and surgical management. J Assoc Physicians India. 2009; 57:163-70. View

Wright J, Small N, Raynor P, Tuffnell D, Bhopal R, Cameron N . Cohort Profile: the Born in Bradford multi-ethnic family cohort study. Int J Epidemiol. 2012; 42(4):978-91. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dys112. View

10.

Misra A . Revisions of cutoffs of body mass index to define overweight and obesity are needed for the Asian-ethnic groups. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2003; 27(11):1294-6. DOI: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802412. View

11.

Whitlock G, Lewington S, Sherliker P, Clarke R, Emberson J, Halsey J . Body-mass index and cause-specific mortality in 900 000 adults: collaborative analyses of 57 prospective studies. Lancet. 2009; 373(9669):1083-96. PMC: 2662372. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60318-4. View

12.

Raynor P . Born in Bradford, a cohort study of babies born in Bradford, and their parents: protocol for the recruitment phase. BMC Public Health. 2008; 8:327. PMC: 2562385. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-327. View

13.

Pednekar M, Hakama M, Hebert J, Gupta P . Association of body mass index with all-cause and cause-specific mortality: findings from a prospective cohort study in Mumbai (Bombay), India. Int J Epidemiol. 2008; 37(3):524-35. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyn001. View

14.

Empana J, Ducimetiere P, Arveiler D, Ferrieres J, Evans A, Ruidavets J . Are the Framingham and PROCAM coronary heart disease risk functions applicable to different European populations? The PRIME Study. Eur Heart J. 2003; 24(21):1903-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.ehj.2003.09.002. View

15.

Razak F, Anand S, Shannon H, Vuksan V, Davis B, Jacobs R . Defining obesity cut points in a multiethnic population. Circulation. 2007; 115(16):2111-8. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.635011. View

16.

Pierce B, Kalra T, Argos M, Parvez F, Chen Y, Islam T . A prospective study of body mass index and mortality in Bangladesh. Int J Epidemiol. 2009; 39(4):1037-45. PMC: 2929350. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyp364. View

17.

Brindle P, Emberson J, Lampe F, Walker M, Whincup P, Fahey T . Predictive accuracy of the Framingham coronary risk score in British men: prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2003; 327(7426):1267. PMC: 286248. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.327.7426.1267. View