» Articles » PMID: 23789043

Are More Low-risk Prostate Cancers Detected by Repeated Biopsy? A Retrospective Pilot Study

Overview
Journal Korean J Urol
Specialty Urology
Date 2013 Jun 22
PMID 23789043
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: We hypothesized that there might be a higher incidence of low-risk prostate cancer (PCa) in men diagnosed at a repeated biopsy. Thus, we investigated differences in clinicopathological results of PCa after primary and repeated biopsy.

Materials And Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients diagnosed with PCa at a primary or repeated biopsy from January 2004 to April 2011. Patients were stratified into primary biopsy and repeated biopsy groups. We analyzed prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage, Gleason score (GS), positive core ratio, and low-risk group by using D'Amico classification. We also investigated GS upgrading and upstaging after radical prostatectomy (RP).

Results: Among 448 primary and 37 repeated biopsy PCa patients, 82 (group 1) and 25 (group 2) underwent RP. The percentage of low-risk patients did not differ significantly between the groups. The positive biopsy core ratio was significantly lower in group 2 (p=0.009). The percentages of GS upgrading and upstaging were 42.7% and 47.6% in group 1, respectively (p=0.568), and 48.0% and 52.0% in group 2, respectively (p=0.901). In the analysis of low-risk patients, GS upgrading and upstaging were not significantly different between the groups (p=0.615 and p=0.959, respectively).

Conclusions: A lower positive core ratio may imply a small volume of PCa and possibly insignificant PCa in the repeated biopsy group. However, no significant differences were observed for the ratio of low-risk cancers, GS upgrading, or upstaging between the groups. Therefore, PCa diagnosed at a repeated biopsy is not an additional indication for active surveillance.

Citing Articles

Diagnostic role of prostate resection in the elderly patients who experience significant co-morbidity with a high clinical suspicion of prostate cancer.

Kang H, Yang J, Kwon W, Lee Y, Kim W, Kim Y J Korean Med Sci. 2013; 28(12):1796-800.

PMID: 24339711 PMC: 3857377. DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2013.28.12.1796.

References
1.
Villa L, Capitanio U, Briganti A, Abdollah F, Suardi N, Salonia A . The number of cores taken in patients diagnosed with a single microfocus at initial biopsy is a major predictor of insignificant prostate cancer. J Urol. 2012; 189(3):854-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.09.100. View

2.
Park M, You D, Yoon J, Jeong I, Song C, Hong J . Does repeat biopsy affect the prognosis of patients with prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy? Analysis by the number of cores taken at initial biopsy. BJU Int. 2011; 109(10):1474-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10442.x. View

3.
Epstein J, Walsh P, Akingba G, Carter H . The significance of prior benign needle biopsies in men subsequently diagnosed with prostate cancer. J Urol. 1999; 162(5):1649-52. View

4.
Djavan B, Susani M, Bursa B, Basharkhah A, Simak R, Marberger M . Predictability and significance of multifocal prostate cancer in the radical prostatectomy specimen. Tech Urol. 1999; 5(3):139-42. View

5.
Yanke B, Gonen M, Scardino P, Kattan M . Validation of a nomogram for predicting positive repeat biopsy for prostate cancer. J Urol. 2005; 173(2):421-4. DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000150522.82760.00. View