» Articles » PMID: 23785444

Levels of State and Trait Anxiety in Patients Referred to Ophthalmology by Primary Care Clinicians: a Cross Sectional Study

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2013 Jun 21
PMID 23785444
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: There is a high level of over-referral from primary eye care leading to significant numbers of people without ocular pathology (false positives) being referred to secondary eye care. The present study used a psychometric instrument to determine whether there is a psychological burden on patients due to referral to secondary eye care, and used Rasch analysis to convert the data from an ordinal to an interval scale.

Design: Cross sectional study.

Participants And Controls: 322 participants and 80 control participants.

Methods: State (i.e. current) and trait (i.e. propensity to) anxiety were measured in a group of patients referred to a hospital eye department in the UK and in a control group who have had a sight test but were not referred. Response category analysis plus infit and outfit Rasch statistics and person separation indices were used to determine the usefulness of individual items and the response categories. Principal components analysis was used to determine dimensionality.

Main Outcome Measure: Levels of state and trait anxiety measured using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory.

Results: State anxiety scores were significantly higher in the patients referred to secondary eye care than the controls (p<0.04), but similar for trait anxiety (p>0.1). Rasch analysis highlighted that the questionnaire results needed to be split into "anxiety-absent" and "anxiety-present" items for both state and trait anxiety, but both subscales showed the same profile of results between patients and controls.

Conclusions: State anxiety was shown to be higher in patients referred to secondary eye care than the controls, and at similar levels to people with moderate to high perceived susceptibility to breast cancer. This suggests that referral from primary to secondary eye care can result in a significant psychological burden on some patients.

Citing Articles

What are the experiences of teleophthalmology in optometric referral pathways? A qualitative interview study with patients and clinicians.

Patel D, Abdi S, Carmichael J, Balaskas K, Blandford A BMJ Open. 2024; 14(5):e078161.

PMID: 38803257 PMC: 11129051. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078161.


Improving equity, efficiency and adherence to referral in Pakistan's eye health programmes: Pre- and post-pandemic onset.

Khan A, Talpur K, Awan Z, Arteaga S, Bolster N, Katibeh M Front Public Health. 2022; 10:873192.

PMID: 35937227 PMC: 9354236. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.873192.


A prospective study on effectiveness of elevated intraocular pressure as a criterion for glaucoma referrals by optometric practitioners in Sweden.

Landgren K, Peters D Acta Ophthalmol. 2021; 99(7):e1098-e1105.

PMID: 33423398 PMC: 8596777. DOI: 10.1111/aos.14764.


Detectability and Bias Indices of Pneumatic Corneal Stimuli Using Signal Detection Theory.

Jayakumar V, Simpson T Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2020; 9(12):17.

PMID: 33240570 PMC: 7671863. DOI: 10.1167/tvst.9.12.17.


A needs assessment for a minor eye condition service within Leeds, Bradford and Airedale, UK.

Swystun A, Davey C BMC Health Serv Res. 2019; 19(1):609.

PMID: 31464616 PMC: 6716842. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-019-4448-8.


References
1.
Marteau T, Kidd J, Cook R, Johnston M, Michie S, Shaw R . Screening for Down's syndrome. BMJ. 1988; 297(6661):1469. PMC: 1835184. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.297.6661.1469-b. View

2.
Henson D, Spencer A, Harper R, Cadman E . Community refinement of glaucoma referrals. Eye (Lond). 2003; 17(1):21-6. DOI: 10.1038/sj.eye.6700261. View

3.
Cleemput I, Kesteloot K, Moons P, Vanrenterghem Y, van Hooff J, Squifflet J . The construct and concurrent validity of the EQ-5D in a renal transplant population. Value Health. 2004; 7(4):499-509. DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2004.74013.x. View

4.
Brewer N, Salz T, Lillie S . Systematic review: the long-term effects of false-positive mammograms. Ann Intern Med. 2007; 146(7):502-10. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-146-7-200704030-00006. View

5.
Stark D, House A . Anxiety in cancer patients. Br J Cancer. 2000; 83(10):1261-7. PMC: 2408796. DOI: 10.1054/bjoc.2000.1405. View