» Articles » PMID: 23781343

Dynamic Stabilisation in the Treatment of Degenerative Disc Disease with Modic Changes

Overview
Journal Adv Orthop
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2013 Jun 20
PMID 23781343
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective. Posterior dynamic stabilization is an effective alternative to fusion in the treatment of chronic instability and degenerative disc disease (DDD) of the lumbar spine. This study was undertaken to investigate the efficacy of dynamic stabilization in chronic degenerative disc disease with Modic types 1 and 2. Modic types 1 and 2 degeneration can be painful. Classic approach in such cases is spine fusion. We operated 88 DDD patients with Modic types 1 and 2 via posterior dynamic stabilization. Good results were obtained after 2 years of followup. Methods. A total of 88 DDD patients with Modic types 1 and 2 were selected for this study. The patients were included in the study between 2004 and 2010. All of them were examined with lumbar anteroposterior (AP) and lateral X-rays. Lordosis of the lumbar spine, segmental lordosis, and ratio of the height of the intervertebral disc spaces (IVSs) were measured preoperatively and at 3, 12, and 24 months after surgery. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) analysis was carried out, and according to the data obtained, the grade of disc degeneration was classified. The quality of life and pain scores were evaluated by visual analog scale (VAS) score and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) preoperatively and at 3, 12, and 24 months after surgery. Appropriate statistical method was chosen. Results. The mean 3- and 12-month postoperative IVS ratio was significantly greater than that of the preoperative group (P < 0.001). However, the mean 1 and 2 postoperative IVS ratio was not significantly different (P > 0.05). Furthermore, the mean preoperative and 1 and 2 postoperative angles of lumbar lordosis and segmental lordosis were not significantly different (P > 0.05). The mean VAS score and ODI, 3, 12, and 24 months after surgery, decreased significantly, when compared with the preoperative scores in the groups (P = 0.000). Conclusion. Dynamic stabilization in chronic degenerative disc disease with Modic types 1 and 2 was effective.

Citing Articles

Clinical and radiological analysis of the effects of three different lumbar transpedicular dynamic stabilization system on disc degeneration and regeneration.

Karadag M, Akgun M, Basak A, Ates O, Tepebasili M, Gunerbuyuk C Front Surg. 2024; 10:1297790.

PMID: 38162089 PMC: 10757836. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1297790.


The relationship between traction spurs, Modic change, vacuum phenomenon, and segmental instability of the lumbar spine.

Tsukamoto M, Morimoto T, Kobayashi T, Muranaka K, Yoshihara T, Maeda K Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):9939.

PMID: 35705718 PMC: 9200777. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-14244-4.


Effect of Preoperative Modic Change in the Outcome of Patients with Low Back Pain Following Posterior Spinal Fusion or Laminectomy.

Shahmohammadi M, Behrouzian S Asian J Neurosurg. 2019; 14(2):432-435.

PMID: 31143258 PMC: 6516000. DOI: 10.4103/ajns.AJNS_41_18.


Transforaminal Epiduroscopic Basivertebral Nerve Laser Ablation for Chronic Low Back Pain Associated with Modic Changes: A Preliminary Open-Label Study.

Kim H, Adsul N, Yudoyono F, Paudel B, Kim K, Choi S Pain Res Manag. 2018; 2018:6857983.

PMID: 30186540 PMC: 6112211. DOI: 10.1155/2018/6857983.


Do Modic changes have an impact on clinical outcome in lumbar spine surgery? A systematic literature review.

Laustsen A, Bech-Azeddine R Eur Spine J. 2016; 25(11):3735-3745.

PMID: 27177469 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-016-4609-y.


References
1.
Sapkas G, Themistocleous G, Mavrogenis A, Benetos I, Metaxas N, Papagelopoulos P . Stabilization of the lumbar spine using the dynamic neutralization system. Orthopedics. 2007; 30(10):859-65. DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20071001-18. View

2.
Vital J, Gille O, Pointillart V, Pedram M, Bacon P, Razanabola F . Course of Modic 1 six months after lumbar posterior osteosynthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003; 28(7):715-20; discussion 721. DOI: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000051924.39568.31. View

3.
Kjaer P, Korsholm L, Bendix T, Sorensen J, Leboeuf-Yde C . Modic changes and their associations with clinical findings. Eur Spine J. 2006; 15(9):1312-9. PMC: 2438570. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-006-0185-x. View

4.
Buttermann G, Heithoff K, Ogilvie J, Transfeldt E, Cohen M . Vertebral body MRI related to lumbar fusion results. Eur Spine J. 1997; 6(2):115-20. PMC: 3454594. DOI: 10.1007/BF01358743. View

5.
Ozer A, Crawford N, Sasani M, Oktenoglu T, Bozkus H, Kaner T . Dynamic lumbar pedicle screw-rod stabilization: two-year follow-up and comparison with fusion. Open Orthop J. 2010; 4:137-41. PMC: 2864427. DOI: 10.2174/1874325001004010137. View