» Articles » PMID: 23775981

Internal Pressure of Human Meniscal Root Attachments During Loading

Overview
Journal J Orthop Res
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2013 Jun 19
PMID 23775981
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study investigated the internal fluid pressure of human cadaver meniscal root attachments. A pressure micro-sensor was implanted inside each attachment site. Tibiofemoral joints were compressed to 2× body weight at various flexion angles and pressure recorded for 20 min. The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) was then transected and joints retested. Lastly, a longitudinal incision of the lateral posterior (LP) horn was made and the joint retested. Ramp pressure was defined as the pressure when 2× body weight was reached, and equilibrium pressure was recorded at the end of the hold period. The medial posterior (MP) attachment was subjected to greater ramp pressure than the medial anterior (p = 0.002) and greater equilibrium pressure than all other root attachment sites (p < 0.001). Flexion angle had a significant effect on pressure as full extension was greatest at ramp (p = 0.040). Transection of the ACL decreased ramp pressure in the LP attachment (p = 0.025) and increased equilibrium pressure (p = 0.031) in the MP attachment. The results suggest that repair strategies should be developed which reconstruct the MP attachments to be sufficient to withstand large pressures. Furthermore, since meniscal pressure is highest at full extension, this fact should be considered when prescribing rehabilitation following repair of an attachment.

Citing Articles

A review of strategies for development of tissue engineered meniscal implants.

Klarmann G, Gaston J, Ho V Biomater Biosyst. 2023; 4:100026.

PMID: 36824574 PMC: 9934480. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbiosy.2021.100026.


Peripheral Stabilization Suture to Address Meniscal Extrusion in a Revision Meniscal Root Repair: Surgical Technique and Rehabilitation Protocol.

Dean R, DePhillipo N, Monson J, LaPrade R Arthrosc Tech. 2020; 9(8):e1211-e1218.

PMID: 32874903 PMC: 7451443. DOI: 10.1016/j.eats.2020.04.022.


Zonal differences in meniscus MR relaxation times in response to in vivo static loading in knee osteoarthritis.

Calixto N, Kumar D, Subburaj K, Singh J, Schooler J, Nardo L J Orthop Res. 2015; 34(2):249-61.

PMID: 26223430 PMC: 6714045. DOI: 10.1002/jor.23004.


Posterior meniscus root tears: associated pathologies to assist as diagnostic tools.

Matheny L, Ockuly A, Steadman J, LaPrade R Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014; 23(10):3127-31.

PMID: 24866130 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-014-3073-7.

References
1.
Johannsen A, Civitarese D, Padalecki J, Goldsmith M, Wijdicks C, LaPrade R . Qualitative and quantitative anatomic analysis of the posterior root attachments of the medial and lateral menisci. Am J Sports Med. 2012; 40(10):2342-7. DOI: 10.1177/0363546512457642. View

2.
Jones A, Houang M, Low R, Wood D . Medial meniscus posterior root attachment injury and degeneration: MRI findings. Australas Radiol. 2006; 50(4):306-13. DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1673.2006.01586.x. View

3.
DLima D, Patil S, Steklov N, Slamin J, Colwell Jr C . Tibial forces measured in vivo after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2006; 21(2):255-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2005.07.011. View

4.
Ward S, Davis J, Kaufman K, Lieber R . Relationship between muscle stress and intramuscular pressure during dynamic muscle contractions. Muscle Nerve. 2007; 36(3):313-9. PMC: 5716358. DOI: 10.1002/mus.20828. View

5.
Ahmed A, Burke D . In-vitro measurement of static pressure distribution in synovial joints--Part I: Tibial surface of the knee. J Biomech Eng. 1983; 105(3):216-25. DOI: 10.1115/1.3138409. View