» Articles » PMID: 23775532

Prospective, Randomized-controlled Trial Comparing Postoperative Pain After Plug and Patch Open Repair with Totally Extraperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair

Overview
Journal Hernia
Publisher Springer
Date 2013 Jun 19
PMID 23775532
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare postoperative pain between the open tension-free plug and patch (PP) technique and the totally extraperitoneal patch (TEP) hernioplasty.

Methods: One hundred and fifty-four male patients with unilateral inguinal hernia were randomized to undergo PP and TEP from 2005 to 2009. Pain assessment was conducted using the numerical rating scale (NRS) and the McGill Pain Questionnaire preoperatively, 6, 12 and 24 months postoperatively. All patients received the same analgesic regimen and documented pain in a NRS-based 4-week diary.

Results: Of the 154 patients 77 underwent TEP and 77 PP. Median follow-up was 3.8 years. One recurrent hernia was observed in the TEP and two in the PP group (p = 0.56). Median preoperative NRS scores were 2 and 2, 0.3 and 0.4 at 6 months, 0.1 and 0.3 at 12 months, 0.2 and 0.1 at 24 months postoperatively in the PP and TEP groups, respectively (p > 0.05). Data from the 4-week pain diaries revealed significant differences in pain intensity between the two different techniques from the second postoperative week (p < 0.05). Patients in the PP group required more additional analgesics on day four and five postoperatively (p = 0.037 and 0.015, respectively).

Conclusions: Our data favor the TEP technique concerning postoperative pain as primary endpoint between tension-free PP and TEP hernia repair.

Citing Articles

Sexual dysfunction between laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Supsamutchai C, Wattanapreechanon P, Saengsri S, Wilasrusmee C, Poprom N Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023; 408(1):277.

PMID: 37450061 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-03006-z.


Varying convalescence recommendations after inguinal hernia repair: a systematic scoping review.

Harmankaya S, Oberg S, Rosenberg J Hernia. 2022; 26(4):1009-1021.

PMID: 35768670 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-022-02629-3.


Primary inguinal hernia: systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis comparing open, laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal, totally extraperitoneal, and robotic preperitoneal repair.

Aiolfi A, Cavalli M, Micheletto G, Lombardo F, Bonitta G, Morlacchi A Hernia. 2019; 23(3):473-484.

PMID: 31089835 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-019-01964-2.


Mesh versus non-mesh for inguinal and femoral hernia repair.

Lockhart K, Dunn D, Teo S, Ng J, Dhillon M, Teo E Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018; 9:CD011517.

PMID: 30209805 PMC: 6513260. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011517.pub2.


Comparison of Lichtenstein Repair and Mesh Plug Repair Methods in The Treatment of Indirect Inguinal Hernia.

Destek S, Gul V Cureus. 2018; 10(7):e2935.

PMID: 30202667 PMC: 6128592. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.2935.

References
1.
Nienhuijs S, Boelens O, Strobbe L . Pain after anterior mesh hernia repair. J Am Coll Surg. 2005; 200(6):885-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.02.005. View

2.
Muldoon R, Marchant K, Johnson D, Yoder G, Read R, Hauer-Jensen M . Lichtenstein vs anterior preperitoneal prosthetic mesh placement in open inguinal hernia repair: a prospective, randomized trial. Hernia. 2003; 8(2):98-103. DOI: 10.1007/s10029-003-0174-5. View

3.
Nyhus L . Individualization of hernia repair: a new era. Surgery. 1993; 114(1):1-2. View

4.
Singh A, Bansal V, Misra M, Kumar S, Rajeshwari S, Kumar A . Testicular functions, chronic groin pain, and quality of life after laparoscopic and open mesh repair of inguinal hernia: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2011; 26(5):1304-17. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-011-2029-y. View

5.
Kugel R . Minimally invasive, nonlaparoscopic, preperitoneal, and sutureless, inguinal herniorrhaphy. Am J Surg. 1999; 178(4):298-302. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(99)00181-6. View