Evaluation of a Workplace Intervention to Promote Commuter Cycling: a RE-AIM Analysis

Overview

Journal BMC Public Health

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Public Health

Date 2013 Jun 19

PMID 23773476

Citations 8

Authors

Veerle Dubuy

Katrien De Cocker

Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij

Lea Maes

Jan Seghers

Johan Lefevre

Kristine De Martelaer

Greet Cardon

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Originating from the interdisciplinary collaboration between public health and the transportation field a workplace intervention to promote commuter cycling, 'Bike to Work: cyclists are rewarded', was implemented. The intervention consisted of two cycling contests, an online loyalty program based on earning 'cycling points' and the dissemination of information through folders, newsletters, posters and a website. The study purpose was to evaluate the dissemination efforts of the program and to gain insights in whether free participation could persuade small and middle-sized companies to sign up.

Methods: The RE-AIM framework was used to guide the evaluation. Two months after the start of the intervention a questionnaire was send to 4880 employees. At the end of the intervention each company contact person (n = 12) was interviewed to obtain information on adoption, implementation and maintenance.Comparison analyses between employees aware and unaware of the program were conducted using independent-samples t-tests for quantitative data and chi-square tests for qualitative data. Difference in commuter cycling frequency was assessed using an ANOVA test. Non-parametric tests were used for the comparison analyses between the adopting and non-adopting companies.

Results: In total seven of the twelve participating companies adopted the program and all adopting companies implemented all intervention components. No significant differences were found in the mean number of employees (p = 0.15) or in the type of business sector (p = 0.92) between adopting and non-adopting companies. Five out of seven companies had the intention to continue the program. At the individual level, a project awareness of 65% was found. Employees aware of the program had a significantly more positive attitude towards cycling and reported significantly more commuter cycling than those unaware of the program (both p < 0.001). Participation was mainly because of health and environmental considerations.

Conclusions: The results of the dissemination study are promising. The adoption and implementation rates indicate that the 'Bike to Work: cyclists are rewarded' program seems to be a feasible workplace intervention. At the individual level, a higher score of commuter cycling was found among the employees aware of the program. Nevertheless, more evidence regarding long term effectiveness and sustainability of the intervention is needed.

Citing Articles

Development and optimisation of a multi-component workplace intervention to increase cycling for the Cycle Nation Project.

Connell H, Logan G, Somers C, Baker G, Broadfield S, Bunn C Front Sports Act Living. 2022; 4:857554.

PMID: 36385778 PMC: 9643150. DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2022.857554.

Socio-Ecological Natural Experiment with Randomized Controlled Trial to Promote Active Commuting to Work: Process Evaluation, Behavioral Impacts, and Changes in the Use and Quality of Walking and Cycling Paths.

Aittasalo M, Tiilikainen J, Tokola K, Suni J, Sievanen H, Vaha-Ypya H Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019; 16(9).

PMID: 31086071 PMC: 6540220. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16091661.

Strategies to improve the implementation of workplace-based policies or practices targeting tobacco, alcohol, diet, physical activity and obesity.

Wolfenden L, Goldman S, Stacey F, Grady A, Kingsland M, Williams C Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018; 11:CD012439.

PMID: 30480770 PMC: 6362433. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012439.pub2.

Evaluation of the implementation of a whole-workplace walking programme using the RE-AIM framework.

Adams E, Chalkley A, Esliger D, Sherar L BMC Public Health. 2017; 17(1):466.

PMID: 28521754 PMC: 5437663. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-017-4376-7.

Promoting Active Transport in Older Adolescents Before They Obtain Their Driving Licence: A Matched Control Intervention Study.

Verhoeven H, Simons D, Van Cauwenberg J, Van Dyck D, Vandelanotte C, de Geus B PLoS One. 2016; 11(12):e0168594.

PMID: 28033355 PMC: 5199110. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168594.

References

Warburton D, Nicol C, Bredin S . Health benefits of physical activity: the evidence. CMAJ. 2006; 174(6):801-9. PMC: 1402378. DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.051351. View

Engbers L, Van Poppel M, Chin A Paw M, van Mechelen W . Worksite health promotion programs with environmental changes: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2005; 29(1):61-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.03.001. View

Harden A, Peersman G, Oliver S, Mauthner M, Oakley A . A systematic review of the effectiveness of health promotion interventions in the workplace. Occup Med (Lond). 2000; 49(8):540-8. DOI: 10.1093/occmed/49.8.540. View

Shain M, Kramer D . Health promotion in the workplace: framing the concept; reviewing the evidence. Occup Environ Med. 2004; 61(7):643-8, 585. PMC: 1740810. DOI: 10.1136/oem.2004.013193. View

Oja P, Vuori I, Paronen O . Daily walking and cycling to work: their utility as health-enhancing physical activity. Patient Educ Couns. 2000; 33(1 Suppl):S87-94. DOI: 10.1016/s0738-3991(98)00013-5. View

Glasgow R, Klesges L, Dzewaltowski D, Bull S, Estabrooks P . The future of health behavior change research: what is needed to improve translation of research into health promotion practice?. Ann Behav Med. 2004; 27(1):3-12. DOI: 10.1207/s15324796abm2701_2. View

Wen L, Orr N, Bindon J, Rissel C . Promoting active transport in a workplace setting: evaluation of a pilot study in Australia. Health Promot Int. 2005; 20(2):123-33. DOI: 10.1093/heapro/dah602. View

Ogilvie D, Egan M, Hamilton V, Petticrew M . Promoting walking and cycling as an alternative to using cars: systematic review. BMJ. 2004; 329(7469):763. PMC: 520994. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.38216.714560.55. View

Dunn A, Andersen R, Jakicic J . Lifestyle physical activity interventions. History, short- and long-term effects, and recommendations. Am J Prev Med. 1998; 15(4):398-412. DOI: 10.1016/s0749-3797(98)00084-1. View

10.

Maes L, Van Cauwenberghe E, Van Lippevelde W, Spittaels H, De Pauw E, Oppert J . Effectiveness of workplace interventions in Europe promoting healthy eating: a systematic review. Eur J Public Health. 2011; 22(5):677-83. DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckr098. View

11.

Van Acker R, De Bourdeaudhuij I, De Cocker K, Klesges L, Cardon G . The impact of disseminating the whole-community project '10,000 Steps': a RE-AIM analysis. BMC Public Health. 2011; 11:3. PMC: 3022698. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-3. View

12.

Hamer M, Chida Y . Active commuting and cardiovascular risk: a meta-analytic review. Prev Med. 2007; 46(1):9-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.03.006. View

13.

Hillsdon M, Foster C, Thorogood M . Interventions for promoting physical activity. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005; (1):CD003180. PMC: 4164373. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003180.pub2. View

14.

Haskell W, Blair S, Hill J . Physical activity: health outcomes and importance for public health policy. Prev Med. 2009; 49(4):280-2. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.05.002. View

15.

Nocon M, Hiemann T, Muller-Riemenschneider F, Thalau F, Roll S, Willich S . Association of physical activity with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2008; 15(3):239-46. DOI: 10.1097/HJR.0b013e3282f55e09. View

16.

Eakin E, Brown W, Marshall A, Mummery K, Larsen E . Physical activity promotion in primary care: bridging the gap between research and practice. Am J Prev Med. 2004; 27(4):297-303. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.07.012. View

17.

Booth M, Bauman A, Owen N, Gore C . Physical activity preferences, preferred sources of assistance, and perceived barriers to increased activity among physically inactive Australians. Prev Med. 1997; 26(1):131-7. DOI: 10.1006/pmed.1996.9982. View

18.

Proper K, Koning M, van der Beek A, Hildebrandt V, Bosscher R, van Mechelen W . The effectiveness of worksite physical activity programs on physical activity, physical fitness, and health. Clin J Sport Med. 2003; 13(2):106-17. DOI: 10.1097/00042752-200303000-00008. View

19.

Dzewaltowski D, Glasgow R, Klesges L, Estabrooks P, Brock E . RE-AIM: evidence-based standards and a Web resource to improve translation of research into practice. Ann Behav Med. 2004; 28(2):75-80. DOI: 10.1207/s15324796abm2802_1. View

20.

Pate R, Pratt M, Blair S, Haskell W, Macera C, Bouchard C . Physical activity and public health. A recommendation from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Sports Medicine. JAMA. 1995; 273(5):402-7. DOI: 10.1001/jama.273.5.402. View