» Articles » PMID: 23773313

Cleavage-stage Biopsy Significantly Impairs Human Embryonic Implantation Potential While Blastocyst Biopsy Does Not: a Randomized and Paired Clinical Trial

Overview
Journal Fertil Steril
Date 2013 Jun 19
PMID 23773313
Citations 161
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To determine if cleavage- or blastocyst-stage embryo biopsy affects reproductive competence.

Design: Paired randomized clinical trial.

Setting: Academic-assisted reproduction program.

Patient(s): Attempting conception through IVF.

Intervention(s): After selecting two embryos for transfer, one was randomized to biopsy and the other to control. Both were transferred within shortly thereafter. The biopsy was submitted for microarray analysis and single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) profiling. Buccal DNA obtained from the neonate after delivery had microarray analysis and SNP profile compared with that of the embryonic DNA. A match confirmed that the biopsied embryo implanted and developed to term, whereas a nonmatch indicated that the control embryo had led to the delivery.

Main Outcome Measure(s): Paired analysis of the delivery rates of the transferred embryos. Either twin delivery or failure to deliver represents equivalent outcomes for the biopsied and control embryos. In contrast, singletons were determined to be from the biopsied or the control embryo.

Result(s): Blastomere biopsy on day 3 of development resulted in a significant reduction in sustained implantation. Only 30% of biopsied embryos had sustained implantation and ultimately developed into live-born infants versus 50% of unbiopsied controls, a relative reduction of 39%. In contrast, sustained implantation rates were equivalent (51% vs. 54%) for biopsied and control blastocysts.

Conclusion(s): Cleavage-stage biopsy markedly reduced embryonic reproductive potential. In contrast, trophectoderm biopsy had no measurable impact and may be used safely when embryo biopsy is indicated.

Clinical Trial Registration Number: NCT01219504.

Citing Articles

Preimplantation genetic testing and disorders of placental implantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Chamani I, Taylor L, Ciomperlik H, Dunn T, Reynolds A, Varman B J Assist Reprod Genet. 2025; .

PMID: 40080275 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-025-03441-5.


Trophectoderm Biopsy: Present State of the Art.

De Vos A, De Munck N Genes (Basel). 2025; 16(2).

PMID: 40004463 PMC: 11854799. DOI: 10.3390/genes16020134.


Unveiling clinic variation in utilization of ICSI, PGT, and blastocyst transfer: a comprehensive study using the SART database (2014-2020).

Claffey A, Ngo A, McIntire D, Doody K, Doody K J Assist Reprod Genet. 2025; .

PMID: 39910000 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-025-03413-9.


Prenatal diagnosis following preimplantation genetic testing (PGT): recommendations of the Italian Society of Human Genetics (SIGU).

Grati F, Capalbo A, Gabbiato I, Battaglia P, Pittalis M, Bizzoco D J Assist Reprod Genet. 2025; .

PMID: 39871067 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-024-03358-5.


PGT-A: what's it for, what's wrong?.

Viville S, Aboulghar M J Assist Reprod Genet. 2025; 42(1):63-69.

PMID: 39847200 PMC: 11806166. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-025-03400-0.