» Articles » PMID: 23772119

Corneal Biomechanics in Iatrogenic Ectasia and Keratoconus: A Review of the Literature

Overview
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2013 Jun 18
PMID 23772119
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) (Reichert Ophthalmic Instruments, Buffalo, NY) allows direct measurement of corneal biomechanical properties. Since its introduction, many studies have sought to elucidate the clinical applications of corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF). More recently, detailed corneal deformation signal waveform analysis (WA) has potentially expanded the diagnostic capabilities of the ORA. In this review, the role of CH, CRF, and WA are examined in keratoconus (KC) and iatrogenic ectasia (IE). The PubMed database was searched electronically for peer-reviewed literature in July 2012 and August 2012 without date restrictions. The search strategy included medical subject heading (MeSH) and natural language terms to retrieve references on corneal biomechanics, CH, CRF, corneal deformation signal WA, IE, and KC. The evidence suggests that while CH and CRF are poor screening tools when used alone, increased sensitivity and specificity of KC and IE screening result when these parameters are combined with tomography and topography. Recent advances in WA are promising, but little is currently understood about its biomechanical and clinical relevance. Future studies should seek to refine the screening protocols for KC and IE as well as define the clinical applicability of WA parameters.

Citing Articles

The Utilization of Brillouin Microscopy in Corneal Diagnostics: A Systematic Review.

Loveless B, Moin K, Hoopes P, Moshirfar M Cureus. 2024; 16(7):e65769.

PMID: 39211657 PMC: 11361473. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.65769.


Corneal biomechanics and diagnostics: a review.

Komninou M, Seiler T, Enzmann V Int Ophthalmol. 2024; 44(1):132.

PMID: 38478103 PMC: 10937779. DOI: 10.1007/s10792-024-03057-1.


In Vivo Evaluation of Corneal Biomechanics Following Cross-Linking Surgeries Using Optical Coherence Elastography in a Rabbit Model of Keratoconus.

Zhao Y, Zhu Y, Yan Y, Yang H, Liu J, Lu Y Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2024; 13(2):15.

PMID: 38376862 PMC: 10883337. DOI: 10.1167/tvst.13.2.15.


Splinter Cataract in Patients with Keratoconus and Frequent Eye Rubbing: A Novel Finding.

Kirat O, Ahad M, AlHilali S, Fairaq R Am J Case Rep. 2023; 24:e939082.

PMID: 37113025 PMC: 10152507. DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.939082.


Co-axial acoustic-based optical coherence vibrometry probe for the quantification of resonance frequency modes in ocular tissue.

McAuley R, Nolan A, Curatolo A, Alexandrov S, Zvietcovich F, Varea Bejar A Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):18834.

PMID: 36336702 PMC: 9637745. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-21978-8.


References
1.
Kara N, Altinkaynak H, Baz O, Goker Y . Biomechanical evaluation of cornea in topographically normal relatives of patients with keratoconus. Cornea. 2012; 32(3):262-6. DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e3182490924. View

2.
Zarei-Ghanavati S, Ramirez-Miranda A, Yu F, Hamilton D . Corneal deformation signal waveform analysis in keratoconic versus post-femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis eyes after statistical correction for potentially confounding factors. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012; 38(4):607-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.11.033. View

3.
Jaycock P, Lobo L, Ibrahim J, Tyrer J, Marshall J . Interferometric technique to measure biomechanical changes in the cornea induced by refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005; 31(1):175-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.10.038. View

4.
Luce D . Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005; 31(1):156-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.10.044. View

5.
Dauwe C, Touboul D, Roberts C, Mahmoud A, Kerautret J, Fournier P . Biomechanical and morphological corneal response to placement of intrastromal corneal ring segments for keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009; 35(10):1761-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.05.033. View