Outcome and Life Satisfaction of Adults with Myelomeningocele

Overview

Journal Disabil Health J

Publisher Elsevier

Specialties Health Services
Public Health
Rehabilitation Medicine

Date 2013 Jun 18

PMID 23769483

Citations 12

Authors

Heidi Cope

Kelly McMahon

Elizabeth Heise

Sonja Eubanks

Melanie Garrett

Simon Gregory

Allison Ashley-Koch

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Myelomeningocele (MMC) commonly causes impairments in body structure and functions as well as cognitive disabilities that can have an adverse effect on adult life. Improved medical care has resulted in increased numbers of individuals with MMC surviving to adulthood, however little is known about the impact of MMC on the lives of adults age 25 years or older.

Objective: To gain a better understanding of outcomes in education, employment, relationships, reproduction and life satisfaction of adults with MMC.

Methods: A primarily quantitative multiple-choice questionnaire designed to capture outcomes in education, employment, relationships and reproduction, along with a previously validated life satisfaction checklist (LiSat-11), was completed by adults with MMC. Relationships between demographic variables, outcomes and life satisfaction were determined using cross tabulation analysis, logistic regression and linear regression.

Results: Ninety adults with MMC, age 25-85 years (median age 32), reported a diverse range of outcomes in education, employment, relationships and reproduction. The most consistent variable associated with difficulty attaining adult milestones was hydrocephalus, the presence of which reduced the likelihood of living independently (p ≤ 0.001), having a partner (p = 0.003) and reproducing (p ≤ 0.001), but did not contribute to reduced life satisfaction.

Conclusions: Adults with MMC, especially those without hydrocephalus, can obtain gainful employment, live independently, form partner relationships and have children, and these achievements contribute to life satisfaction. While MMC does not affect overall reported life satisfaction for adults, attention should be paid to specific domains with less reported satisfaction.

Citing Articles

Psychosocial needs and outcomes of adults with spina bifida: A scoping review, 1974-2023.

Mannino J, Reens H, Smith K, Kysh L, Nelson S, Wang Y Health Care Transit. 2024; 2:100041.

PMID: 39712619 PMC: 11658344. DOI: 10.1016/j.hctj.2024.100041.

The urologist's role in bowel management of adult spina bifida: a narrative review.

Sundell M, Koch G, Kaufman M Transl Androl Urol. 2024; 13(1):116-126.

PMID: 38404547 PMC: 10891392. DOI: 10.21037/tau-23-389.

Absence of a Hernia Sack in Patients Undergoing Prenatal Repair of Spina Bifida Increases the Risk of Developing Shunt-Dependent Hydrocephalus.

Pastuszka A, Koszutski T, Horzelska E, Marciniak S, Zamlynski M, Olejek A Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(3).

PMID: 36766448 PMC: 9914716. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13030343.

Quality of life in a 61-year-old paraplegic patient with myelomeningocele: illustrative case.

Borowsky A, Ruge J J Neurosurg Case Lessons. 2022; 3(12).

PMID: 36273869 PMC: 9379677. DOI: 10.3171/CASE21574.

Neurosurgery guidelines for the care of people with spina bifida.

Blount J, Bowman R, Dias M, Hopson B, Partington M, Rocque B J Pediatr Rehabil Med. 2020; 13(4):467-477.

PMID: 33325414 PMC: 7838965. DOI: 10.3233/PRM-200782.

References

Bowman R, McLone D, Grant J, Tomita T, Ito J . Spina bifida outcome: a 25-year prospective. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2001; 34(3):114-20. DOI: 10.1159/000056005. View

Fugl-Meyer A, Melin R, Fugl-Meyer K . Life satisfaction in 18- to 64-year-old Swedes: in relation to gender, age, partner and immigrant status. J Rehabil Med. 2002; 34(5):239-46. DOI: 10.1080/165019702760279242. View

van Mechelen M, Verhoef M, van Asbeck F, Post M . Work participation among young adults with spina bifida in the Netherlands. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008; 50(10):772-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2008.03020.x. View

Oakeshott P, Hunt G . Long-term outcome in open spina bifida. Br J Gen Pract. 2003; 53(493):632-6. PMC: 1314678. View

Sawin K, Bellin M . Quality of life in individuals with spina bifida: a research update. Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2010; 16(1):47-59. DOI: 10.1002/ddrr.96. View

Sandler A . Children with spina bifida: key clinical issues. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2010; 57(4):879-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.pcl.2010.07.009. View

Rintoul N, Sutton L, Hubbard A, Cohen B, Melchionni J, Pasquariello P . A new look at myelomeningoceles: functional level, vertebral level, shunting, and the implications for fetal intervention. Pediatrics. 2002; 109(3):409-13. DOI: 10.1542/peds.109.3.409. View

Roach J, Short B, Saltzman H . Adult consequences of spina bifida: a cohort study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010; 469(5):1246-52. PMC: 3069297. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-010-1594-z. View

Barf H, Post M, Verhoef M, Jennekens-Schinkel A, Gooskens R, Prevo A . Life satisfaction of young adults with spina bifida. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2007; 49(6):458-63. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2007.00458.x. View

10.

Barf H, Verhoef M, Jennekens-Schinkel A, Post M, Gooskens R, Prevo A . Cognitive status of young adults with spina bifida. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2003; 45(12):813-20. DOI: 10.1017/s0012162203001518. View

11.

Dias M, Partington M . Embryology of myelomeningocele and anencephaly. Neurosurg Focus. 2004; 16(2):E1. DOI: 10.3171/foc.2004.16.2.2. View

12.

Deak K, Siegel D, George T, Gregory S, Ashley-Koch A, Speer M . Further evidence for a maternal genetic effect and a sex-influenced effect contributing to risk for human neural tube defects. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2008; 82(10):662-9. PMC: 2981339. DOI: 10.1002/bdra.20511. View

13.

Klingbeil H, Baer H, Wilson P . Aging with a disability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004; 85(7 Suppl 3):S68-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.03.014. View

14.

Laurence K, Beresford A . Continence, friends, marriage and children in 51 adults with spina bifida. Dev Med Child Neurol Suppl. 1975; (35):123-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1975.tb03591.x. View

15.

Gatti C, Del Rossi C, Ferrari A, Casolari E, Casadio G, Scire G . Predictors of successful sexual partnering of adults with spina bifida. J Urol. 2009; 182(4 Suppl):1911-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.02.065. View

16.

Verhoef M, Barf H, Vroege J, Post M, van Asbeck F, Gooskens R . Sex education, relationships, and sexuality in young adults with spina bifida. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005; 86(5):979-87. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.10.042. View

17.

Barf H, Verhoef M, Post M, Jennekens-Schinkel A, Gooskens R, Mullaart R . Educational career and predictors of type of education in young adults with spina bifida. Int J Rehabil Res. 2004; 27(1):45-52. DOI: 10.1097/00004356-200403000-00006. View

18.

McDonnell G, McCann J . Issues of medical management in adults with spina bifida. Childs Nerv Syst. 2000; 16(4):222-7. DOI: 10.1007/s003810050502. View

19.

Woodhouse C . Myelomeningocele in young adults. BJU Int. 2005; 95(2):223-30. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05374.x. View

20.

Shin M, Besser L, Siffel C, Kucik J, Shaw G, Lu C . Prevalence of spina bifida among children and adolescents in 10 regions in the United States. Pediatrics. 2010; 126(2):274-9. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2009-2084. View