» Articles » PMID: 23768234

Modeling Hospital Infrastructure by Optimizing Quality, Accessibility and Efficiency Via a Mixed Integer Programming Model

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Health Services
Date 2013 Jun 18
PMID 23768234
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The majority of curative health care is organized in hospitals. As in most other countries, the current 94 hospital locations in the Netherlands offer almost all treatments, ranging from rather basic to very complex care. Recent studies show that concentration of care can lead to substantial quality improvements for complex conditions and that dispersion of care for chronic conditions may increase quality of care. In previous studies on allocation of hospital infrastructure, the allocation is usually only based on accessibility and/or efficiency of hospital care. In this paper, we explore the possibilities to include a quality function in the objective function, to give global directions to how the 'optimal' hospital infrastructure would be in the Dutch context.

Methods: To create optimal societal value we have used a mathematical mixed integer programming (MIP) model that balances quality, efficiency and accessibility of care for 30 ICD-9 diagnosis groups. Typical aspects that are taken into account are the volume-outcome relationship, the maximum accepted travel times for diagnosis groups that may need emergency treatment and the minimum use of facilities.

Results: The optimal number of hospital locations per diagnosis group varies from 12-14 locations for diagnosis groups which have a strong volume-outcome relationship, such as neoplasms, to 150 locations for chronic diagnosis groups such as diabetes and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

Conclusions: In conclusion, our study shows a new approach for allocating hospital infrastructure over a country or certain region that includes quality of care in relation to volume per provider that can be used in various countries or regions. In addition, our model shows that within the Dutch context chronic care may be too concentrated and complex and/or acute care may be too dispersed. Our approach can relatively easily be adopted towards other countries or regions and is very suitable to perform a 'what-if' analysis.

Citing Articles

Defining minimum volume thresholds to increase quality of care: a new patient-oriented approach using mixed integer programming.

Vogel J, Barkhausen M, Pross C, Geissler A Eur J Health Econ. 2022; 23(7):1085-1104.

PMID: 35089456 PMC: 9395474. DOI: 10.1007/s10198-021-01406-w.

References
1.
Ho V, Petersen L . Estimating cost savings from regionalizing cardiac procedures using hospital discharge data. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2007; 5:7. PMC: 1919355. DOI: 10.1186/1478-7547-5-7. View

2.
Roohan P, Bickell N, Baptiste M, Therriault G, Ferrara E, Siu A . Hospital volume differences and five-year survival from breast cancer. Am J Public Health. 1998; 88(3):454-7. PMC: 1508346. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.88.3.454. View

3.
Killeen S, OSullivan M, Coffey J, Kirwan W, Redmond H . Provider volume and outcomes for oncological procedures. Br J Surg. 2005; 92(4):389-402. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.4954. View

4.
Ho V, Town R, Heslin M . Regionalization versus competition in complex cancer surgery. Health Econ Policy Law. 2008; 2(Pt 1):51-71. DOI: 10.1017/S1744133106006256. View

5.
Shahian D, Normand S . The volume-outcome relationship: from Luft to Leapfrog. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003; 75(3):1048-58. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(02)04308-4. View