» Articles » PMID: 23766974

A New Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Fixation Technique (quadrupled Semitendinosus Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Polyetheretherketone Cage Fixation)

Overview
Journal Arthrosc Tech
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2013 Jun 15
PMID 23766974
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Fixation of the graft during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery has been the subject of numerous technical innovations but still remains a challenge. This article describes a novel technique of graft fixation for hamstring tendon reconstruction: the Cage For One system (Sacimex, Aix-en-Provence, France). The technique uses only the semitendinosus tendon, which is looped to create a 4-strand graft. Leaving the gracilis tendon intact probably reduces the loss of knee flexion strength. The graft is indirectly anchored into both tunnels with polyetheretherketone cages by use of polyethylene terephthalate tape strips. Both cages and strips are magnetic resonance imaging compatible and do not create artifacts. The tunnels are drilled by an outside-in method with minimal incisions. This type of fixation creates a 360° bone contact at 1.5 cm in each tunnel and is compatible with double-bundle reconstruction. This easy-to-use novel technique of fixation for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction produces a strong 4-strand graft while harvesting only the semitendinosus tendon and leaving the gracilis tendon intact to reduce flexion strength loss and preserve rotatory stability of the knee. It creates an immediate solid fixation that is independent of graft integration in the early postoperative period, allowing the patient to start immediate rehabilitation without the use of a brace.

Citing Articles

Incidence and Risk Factors for Residual High-Grade Pivot Shift After ACL Reconstruction With or Without a Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis.

Jacquet C, Pioger C, Seil R, Khakha R, Parratte S, Steltzlen C Orthop J Sports Med. 2021; 9(5):23259671211003590.

PMID: 33997078 PMC: 8113945. DOI: 10.1177/23259671211003590.


No Difference between Extraction Drilling and Serial Dilation for Tibial Tunnel Preparation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.

Crum R, Darren de S, Ayeni O, Musahl V J ISAKOS. 2018; 3(3).

PMID: 30505468 PMC: 6262891. DOI: 10.1136/jisakos-2017-000191.


Can tape-screw fixation of a quadrupled semitendinosus graft in a full-length tibial tunnel provide superior fixation compared with a doubled semitendinosus-gracilis held with an interference screw? A matched-pair cadaveric biomechanical comparison.

Vertullo C, Cadman J, Dabirrahmani D, Appleyard R J Orthop Traumatol. 2018; 19(1):11.

PMID: 30128979 PMC: 6102157. DOI: 10.1186/s10195-018-0495-x.


Current Trends in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Review.

Vaishya R, Agarwal A, Ingole S, Vijay V Cureus. 2015; 7(11):e378.

PMID: 26697280 PMC: 4684270. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.378.

References
1.
Pinczewski L, Lyman J, Salmon L, Russell V, Roe J, Linklater J . A 10-year comparison of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with hamstring tendon and patellar tendon autograft: a controlled, prospective trial. Am J Sports Med. 2007; 35(4):564-74. DOI: 10.1177/0363546506296042. View

2.
Collette M, Cassard X . The Tape Locking Screw technique (TLS): A new ACL reconstruction method using a short hamstring graft. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2011; 97(5):555-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2011.03.016. View

3.
Lubowitz J, Konicek J . Anterior cruciate ligament femoral tunnel length: cadaveric analysis comparing anteromedial portal versus outside-in technique. Arthroscopy. 2010; 26(10):1357-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2010.02.014. View

4.
Lubowitz J, Ahmad C, Amhad C, Anderson K . All-inside anterior cruciate ligament graft-link technique: second-generation, no-incision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2011; 27(5):717-27. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.02.008. View

5.
Gobbi A . Single versus double hamstring tendon harvest for ACL reconstruction. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2010; 18(1):15-9. DOI: 10.1097/JSA.0b013e3181cdb4a6. View