» Articles » PMID: 23762429

Resistance to Oncolytic Myxoma Virus Therapy in Nf1(-/-)/trp53(-/-) Syngeneic Mouse Glioma Models is Independent of Anti-viral Type-I Interferon

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2013 Jun 14
PMID 23762429
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Despite promising preclinical studies, oncolytic viral therapy for malignant gliomas has resulted in variable, but underwhelming results in clinical evaluations. Of concern are the low levels of tumour infection and viral replication within the tumour. This discrepancy between the laboratory and the clinic could result from the disparity of xenograft versus syngeneic models in determining in vivo viral infection, replication and treatment efficacy. Here we describe a panel of primary mouse glioma lines derived from Nf1 (+/-) Trp53 (+/-) mice in the C57Bl/6J background for use in the preclinical testing of the oncolytic virus Myxoma (MYXV). These lines show a range of susceptibility to MYXV replication in vitro, but all succumb to viral-mediated cell death. Two of these lines orthotopically grafted produced aggressive gliomas. Intracranial injection of MYXV failed to result in sustained viral replication or treatment efficacy, with minimal tumour infection that was completely resolved by 7 days post-infection. We hypothesized that the stromal production of Type-I interferons (IFNα/β) could explain the resistance seen in these models; however, we found that neither the cell lines in vitro nor the tumours in vivo produce any IFNα/β in response to MYXV infection. To confirm IFNα/β did not play a role in this resistance, we ablated the ability of tumours to respond to IFNα/β via IRF9 knockdown, and generated identical results. Our studies demonstrate that these syngeneic cell lines are relevant preclinical models for testing experimental glioma treatments, and show that IFNα/β is not responsible for the MYXV treatment resistance seen in syngeneic glioma models.

Citing Articles

The Present and Future of Optic Pathway Glioma Therapy.

Dal Bello S, Martinuzzi D, Tereshko Y, Veritti D, Sarao V, Gigli G Cells. 2023; 12(19).

PMID: 37830595 PMC: 10572241. DOI: 10.3390/cells12192380.


Oncolytic Virotherapy with Myxoma Virus.

Rahman M, McFadden G J Clin Med. 2020; 9(1).

PMID: 31936317 PMC: 7020043. DOI: 10.3390/jcm9010171.


Neurofibromin 1 expression is negatively correlated with malignancy and prognosis of epithelial ovarian cancer.

Qiao G, Jia X, Zhang Y, Chen B Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2020; 12(5):1702-1712.

PMID: 31933988 PMC: 6947127.


Virus-Based Immunotherapy of Glioblastoma.

Martikainen M, Essand M Cancers (Basel). 2019; 11(2).

PMID: 30764570 PMC: 6407011. DOI: 10.3390/cancers11020186.


Tumor Restrictions to Oncolytic Virus.

Vaha-Koskela M, Hinkkanen A Biomedicines. 2017; 2(2):163-194.

PMID: 28548066 PMC: 5423468. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines2020163.


References
1.
McKeever P, Davenport R, Shakui P . Patterns of antigenic expression of human glioma cells. Crit Rev Neurobiol. 1991; 6(2):119-47. View

2.
Paul S, Ricour C, Sommereyns C, Sorgeloos F, Michiels T . Type I interferon response in the central nervous system. Biochimie. 2007; 89(6-7):770-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.biochi.2007.02.009. View

3.
Collins S, Noyce R, Mossman K . Innate cellular response to virus particle entry requires IRF3 but not virus replication. J Virol. 2004; 78(4):1706-17. PMC: 369475. DOI: 10.1128/jvi.78.4.1706-1717.2004. View

4.
Verhaak R, Hoadley K, Purdom E, Wang V, Qi Y, Wilkerson M . Integrated genomic analysis identifies clinically relevant subtypes of glioblastoma characterized by abnormalities in PDGFRA, IDH1, EGFR, and NF1. Cancer Cell. 2010; 17(1):98-110. PMC: 2818769. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2009.12.020. View

5.
Wennier S, Li S, McFadden G . Oncolytic virotherapy for pancreatic cancer. Expert Rev Mol Med. 2011; 13:e18. PMC: 3230120. DOI: 10.1017/S1462399411001876. View