» Articles » PMID: 23759373

Differentiation of Glioblastomas from Metastatic Brain Tumors by Tryptophan Uptake and Kinetic Analysis: a Positron Emission Tomographic Study with Magnetic Resonance Imaging Comparison

Overview
Journal Mol Imaging
Publisher Sage Publications
Specialty Radiology
Date 2013 Jun 14
PMID 23759373
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Differentiating high-grade gliomas from solitary brain metastases is often difficult by conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); molecular imaging may facilitate such discrimination. We tested the accuracy of α[11C]methyl-l-tryptophan (AMT)-positron emission tomography (PET) to differentiate newly diagnosed glioblastomas from brain metastases. AMT-PET was performed in 36 adults with suspected brain malignancy. Tumoral AMT accumulation was measured by standardized uptake values (SUVs). Tracer kinetic analysis was also performed to separate tumoral net tryptophan transport (by AMT volume of distribution [VD]) from unidirectional uptake rates using dynamic PET and blood input function. Differentiating the accuracy of these PET variables was evaluated and compared to conventional MRI. For glioblastoma/metastasis differentiation, tumoral AMT SUV showed the highest accuracy (74%) and the tumor/cortex VD ratio had the highest positive predictive value (82%). The combined accuracy of MRI (size of contrast-enhancing lesion) and AMT-PET reached up to 93%. For ring-enhancing lesions, tumor/cortex SUV ratios were higher in glioblastomas than in metastatic tumors and could differentiate these two tumor types with > 90% accuracy. These results demonstrate that evaluation of tryptophan accumulation by PET can enhance pretreatment differentiation of glioblastomas and metastatic brain tumors. This approach may be particularly useful in patients with a newly diagnosed solitary ring-enhancing mass.

Citing Articles

Classification of high-grade glioblastoma and single brain metastases using a new SCAT-inception model trained with MRI images.

Lv C, Shu X, Chang H, Qiu J, Peng S, Yu K Front Neurosci. 2024; 18:1349781.

PMID: 38560048 PMC: 10979639. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1349781.


The Role of Molecular Imaging in Patients with Brain Metastases: A Literature Review.

Urso L, Bonatto E, Nieri A, Castello A, Maffione A, Marzola M Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(7).

PMID: 37046845 PMC: 10093739. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15072184.


Artificial intelligence in the radiomic analysis of glioblastomas: A review, taxonomy, and perspective.

Zhu M, Li S, Kuang Y, Hill V, Heimberger A, Zhai L Front Oncol. 2022; 12:924245.

PMID: 35982952 PMC: 9379255. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.924245.


Investigational PET tracers in neuro-oncology-What's on the horizon? A report of the PET/RANO group.

Galldiks N, Langen K, Albert N, Law I, Kim M, Villanueva-Meyer J Neuro Oncol. 2022; 24(11):1815-1826.

PMID: 35674736 PMC: 9629449. DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noac131.


Differentiating solitary brain metastases from glioblastoma by radiomics features derived from MRI and 18F-FDG-PET and the combined application of multiple models.

Cao X, Tan D, Liu Z, Liao M, Kan Y, Yao R Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):5722.

PMID: 35388124 PMC: 8986767. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-09803-8.


References
1.
Alkonyi B, Mittal S, Zitron I, Chugani D, Kupsky W, Muzik O . Increased tryptophan transport in epileptogenic dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumors. J Neurooncol. 2011; 107(2):365-72. PMC: 3296904. DOI: 10.1007/s11060-011-0750-y. View

2.
Lehmann P, Saliou G, de Marco G, Monet P, Souraya S, Bruniau A . Cerebral peritumoral oedema study: does a single dynamic MR sequence assessing perfusion and permeability can help to differentiate glioblastoma from metastasis?. Eur J Radiol. 2011; 81(3):522-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.01.076. View

3.
Mahasittiwat P, Mizoe J, Hasegawa A, Ishikawa H, Yoshikawa K, Mizuno H . l-[METHYL-(11)C] methionine positron emission tomography for target delineation in malignant gliomas: impact on results of carbon ion radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007; 70(2):515-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.06.071. View

4.
Al-Okaili R, Krejza J, Woo J, Wolf R, ORourke D, Judy K . Intraaxial brain masses: MR imaging-based diagnostic strategy--initial experience. Radiology. 2007; 243(2):539-50. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2432060493. View

5.
Pauleit D, Floeth F, Hamacher K, Riemenschneider M, Reifenberger G, Muller H . O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine PET combined with MRI improves the diagnostic assessment of cerebral gliomas. Brain. 2005; 128(Pt 3):678-87. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awh399. View