» Articles » PMID: 23755287

Assessment of Intratumoral Micromorphology for Patients with Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Using Susceptibility-weighted Imaging

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2013 Jun 12
PMID 23755287
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Multiple treatment options exist for the management of renal cell carcinomas. Preoperative evaluation of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CRCC) grades is important for deciding upon the appropriate method of therapy. We hypothesize that susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI) is sensitive enough to detect intratumoral microvessles and microbleeding in renal cell carcinoma, which can be used to grade CRCC.

Material And Methods: Retrospective reviews of 37 patients with pathologically proven CRCCs were evaluated. All patients underwent SWI examinations. The characteristics of intratumoral susceptibility signal intensity (ITSS) includes the likelihood of the presence of ITSS, morphology of ITSS, dominant structure of ITSS and ratio of ITSS area to tumor area, which were all assessed on SWI. The results were compared using the nonparametric Mann-Whitney test.

Results: ITSS was seen in all patients except 4 patients with low-grade CRCCs. There was no significant difference between low and high-grade CRCCs when looking at the likelihood of the presence of ITSS. There was a significant difference in the mean score of dominant structures between low and high-grade CRCCs. Specifically, more dominant vascular structures and less hemorrhage were seen in low-grade tumors (2.15±1.05) compared to high-grade tumors (1.27±0.47) (P<0.005). The ratio of ITSS area to tumor area was also significantly higher for the high-grade group (1.55±0.52) than that for the low-grade group (0.88±0.43) on SWI (P<0.005).

Conclusion: SWI is useful for grading CRCCs.

Citing Articles

Use of Susceptibility-Weighted Imaging (SWI) in the Detection of Brain Hemorrhagic Metastases from Breast Cancer and Melanoma.

Franceschi A, Moschos S, Anders C, Glaubiger S, Collichio F, Lee C J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2016; 40(5):803-5.

PMID: 27636126 PMC: 5027959. DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000420.


Susceptibility-weighted imaging: current status and future directions.

Liu S, Buch S, Chen Y, Choi H, Dai Y, Habib C NMR Biomed. 2016; 30(4).

PMID: 27192086 PMC: 5116013. DOI: 10.1002/nbm.3552.

References
1.
Thompson R, Kurta J, Kaag M, Tickoo S, Kundu S, Katz D . Tumor size is associated with malignant potential in renal cell carcinoma cases. J Urol. 2009; 181(5):2033-6. PMC: 2734327. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.01.027. View

2.
Pahernik S, Ziegler S, Roos F, Melchior S, Thuroff J . Small renal tumors: correlation of clinical and pathological features with tumor size. J Urol. 2007; 178(2):414-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.129. View

3.
Sung H, Park B, Kim C, Choi H, Lee H . Comparison of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation and open partial nephrectomy for the treatment of size- and location-matched renal masses. Int J Hyperthermia. 2012; 28(3):227-34. DOI: 10.3109/02656736.2012.666319. View

4.
Wu Z, Mittal S, Kish K, Yu Y, Hu J, Haacke E . Identification of calcification with MRI using susceptibility-weighted imaging: a case study. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008; 29(1):177-82. PMC: 2646180. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.21617. View

5.
Xing W, He X, Kassir M, Chen J, Ding J, Sun J . Evaluating hemorrhage in renal cell carcinoma using susceptibility weighted imaging. PLoS One. 2013; 8(2):e57691. PMC: 3581533. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057691. View