» Articles » PMID: 23750468

The Therapeutic Relationship in Cognitive-behavioral Therapy and Pharmacotherapy for Anxious Youth

Abstract

Objective: We examined the therapeutic relationship with cognitive-behavioral therapists and with pharmacotherapists for youth from the Child/Adolescent Anxiety Multimodal Study (Walkup et al., 2008). The therapeutic relationship was examined in relation to treatment outcomes.

Method: Participants were 488 youth (ages 7-17 years; 50% male) randomized to cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT; Coping Cat), pharmacotherapy (sertraline), their combination, or placebo pill. Participants met criteria for generalized anxiety disorder, social phobia, and/or separation anxiety disorder according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed.; American Psychiatric Association, 1994). The therapeutic relationship was assessed by youth report at Weeks 6 and 12 of treatment using the Child's Perception of Therapeutic Relationship scale (Kendall et al., 1997). Outcome measures (Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale; Research Units on Pediatric Psychopharmacology Anxiety Study Group, 2002; and Clinical Global Impressions Scales; Guy, 1976) were completed by independent evaluators blind to condition.

Results: For youth who received CBT only, a stronger therapeutic relationship predicted positive treatment outcome. In contrast, the therapeutic relationship did not predict outcome for youth receiving sertraline, combined treatment, or placebo.

Conclusion: A therapeutic relationship may be important for anxious youth who receive CBT alone.

Citing Articles

Caregiver Satisfaction with Anxiety Treatment for Autistic Youth: A Mixed Methods Examination.

Norris L, Rabner J, Marklin M, Crane M, Renschler K, Jenkins E J Autism Dev Disord. 2025; .

PMID: 39930281 DOI: 10.1007/s10803-025-06725-y.


Therapeutic Alliance, Attendance, and Outcomes in Youths Receiving CBT or Client-Centered Therapy for Anxiety.

Bose D, Pettit J, Silk J, Ladouceur C, Olino T, Forbes E J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2023; :1-11.

PMID: 37796228 PMC: 10995113. DOI: 10.1080/15374416.2023.2261547.


Adapting CBT for youth anxiety: Flexibility, within fidelity, in different settings.

Kendall P, Ney J, Maxwell C, Lehrbach K, Jakubovic R, McKnight D Front Psychiatry. 2023; 14:1067047.

PMID: 36937729 PMC: 10014836. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1067047.


The Pediatric Accommodation Scale: Psychometric Evaluation of a Therapist-Report Format.

Phillips K, Buinewicz S, Kagan E, Frank H, Dunning E, Benito K Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2022; 55(3):667-679.

PMID: 36149550 DOI: 10.1007/s10578-022-01447-z.


Case Report: A Functional Approach to Deal With Sexual Harassment Within Families.

Meiling L, Hania A, Waqas M Front Psychol. 2022; 13:537599.

PMID: 35712189 PMC: 9197489. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.537599.


References
1.
Liber J, McLeod B, van Widenfelt B, Goedhart A, van der Leeden A, Utens E . Examining the relation between the therapeutic alliance, treatment adherence, and outcome of cognitive behavioral therapy for children with anxiety disorders. Behav Ther. 2010; 41(2):172-86. DOI: 10.1016/j.beth.2009.02.003. View

2.
Langer D, McLeod B, Weisz J . Do treatment manuals undermine youth-therapist alliance in community clinical practice?. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2011; 79(4):427-32. DOI: 10.1037/a0023821. View

3.
Weisz J, Donenberg G, Han S, Weiss B . Bridging the gap between laboratory and clinic in child and adolescent psychotherapy. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1995; 63(5):688-701. DOI: 10.1037//0022-006x.63.5.688. View

4.
Compton S, Walkup J, Albano A, Piacentini J, Birmaher B, Sherrill J . Child/Adolescent Anxiety Multimodal Study (CAMS): rationale, design, and methods. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2010; 4:1. PMC: 2818613. DOI: 10.1186/1753-2000-4-1. View

5.
Marker C, Comer J, Abramova V, Kendall P . The reciprocal relationship between alliance and symptom improvement across the treatment of childhood anxiety. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2012; 42(1):22-33. PMC: 4224949. DOI: 10.1080/15374416.2012.723261. View